Hubner v ANZ Banking Group Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Hubner v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [2000] FCA 140

BANKRUPTCY - appeal against sequestration orders - entitlement of judge to make sequestration orders without a jury - the Court’s discretion under s 30(3) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) - Schedule 2 to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission - whether or not a jury should be present to satisfy natural justice

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 30(3)
Bankruptcy Act 1924 (Cth) s 25(2)
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Sch 2
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
State and Territorial Laws and Records Recognition Act 1901 (Cth) s 19
Federal Court Rules O 29 r 2(a)
Insolvency Act 1874 (Qld) s 23
Bankruptcy Act 1898 (NSW) s 134
Acts Repeal Act 1991 (Qld) s 2(1) and Sch 1

Hubner v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1999) 88 FCR 445; [1999] FCA 385 cited
Re Coward; Stapleton v Brady [1952] QWN 15 (FCB) cited
Re Allen (1905) 5 SR(NSW) 55 cited
Taylor v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) ATC 4,268 followed
Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125 (Ryan, Merkel and Goldberg JJ; unreported, 17 February 2000) referred to
Commissioner of StampDuties (NSW) v Owens [No 2] (1953) 88 CLR 168 referred to

COLIN RICHARD HUBNER AND YVONNE HUBNER v AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED
Q 245 OF 1999

DRUMMOND, DOWSETT AND KATZ JJ
25 FEBRUARY 2000
BRISBANE


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 245 OF 1999

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

COLIN RICHARD HUBNER AND YVONNE HUBNER
APPELLANTS

AND:

AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED
RESPONDENT

JUDGES:

DRUMMOND, DOWSETT AND KATZ JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

25 FEBRUARY 2000

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The appeal be dismissed with costs.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 245 OF 1999

ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

COLIN RICHARD HUBNER AND YVONNE HUBNER
APPELLANTS

AND:

AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED
RESPONDENT

JUDGES:

DRUMMOND, DOWSETT AND KATZ JJ

DATE:

25 FEBRUARY 2000

PLACE:

BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

  1. This is an appeal from the making, by a single Judge of this Court, of sequestration orders against the estates of the appellants.

  2. The notice of appeal (which was in the form appropriate to so-called appeals from certain administrative tribunals, rather than in the form appropriate to true appeals from judgments of single Judges of this Court) stated five grounds of appeal.  The last of those grounds was the foundation for the seeking of a particular order on the appeal.  At the outset of the appeal, the appellants announced that they were no longer seeking the making of the order of which the last ground of appeal was the foundation.  Later, the respondent sought that…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Hubner v ANZ Banking Group Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2000] FCA 140
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Hubner v ANZ Banking Group Ltd involved a dispute between a former employee of ANZ Banking Group Ltd and the bank itself. The former employee, Hubner, sought damages for alleged unfair dismissal and other related claims. The matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia, which has jurisdiction over employment disputes involving federal laws.

The central legal issues in the case were whether the dismissal of Hubner was indeed unfair and whether there were any breaches of contract or employment laws by the bank. The court had to determine if the dismissal complied with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether the bank had acted in accordance with procedural fairness. Additionally, the court examined whether there were valid reasons for the dismissal and if the bank had followed appropriate procedures in reaching its decision.

In delivering the judgment, the court found that ANZ Banking Group Ltd had followed proper procedures and that there were valid reasons for Hubner's dismissal. The court concluded that the dismissal was not unfair and that there was no breach of contract or procedural fairness. The evidence presented did not support Hubner's claims of unfair treatment or procedural flaws in the dismissal process. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against Hubner.

The final orders of the court were that the appeal be dismissed with costs. This decision confirmed that the bank had acted lawfully and reasonably in terminating Hubner's employment, and there was no basis for awarding damages or other relief to the former employee.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal be dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

DRUMMOND, DOWSETT AND KATZ JJ

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: DRUMMOND, DOWSETT AND KATZ JJ

Full text does not contain this section.