Holden v Van Houten

Case [2012] FCA 4


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Holden v Van Houten [2012] FCA 4

Citation: Holden v Van Houten [2012] FCA 4
Parties: TIMOTHY MARK SHUTTLEWORTH HOLDEN (AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF HALINA VAN HOUTEN) v HALINA VAN HOUTEN
File number: VID 1128 of 2011
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 13 January 2012
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – Bankruptcy annulled – Trustee’s entitlement to costs, expenses and remuneration.
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 153B, 154
Cases cited: Kyriackou v Shield Mercantile Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2004] FCA 1338
Date of hearing: 20 December 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms C Gobbo
Solicitor for the Applicant: Piper Alderman
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent appeared in person

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

VID 1128 of 2011

BETWEEN:

TIMOTHY MARK SHUTTLEWORTH HOLDEN (AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF HALINA VAN HOUTEN)
Applicant

AND:

HALINA VAN HOUTEN
Respondent

JUDGE:

JESSUP J

DATE OF ORDER:

13 JANUARY 2012

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT DECLARES THAT:

1. Pursuant to section 154 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), the applicant may apply the property of the respondent still vested in the applicant (“the respondent’s property”) in payment of the costs, charges and expenses of the administration of the bankruptcy of the respondent, including the remuneration and expenses of the applicant (“the applicant’s costs and remuneration”).

2.   The applicant’s costs and remuneration include –

(a)with respect to the period down to, and including the date of, the annulment of the bankruptcy of the respondent, the sum of $17,176.74 plus goods and services tax;

(b)with respect to the subsequent period, the costs, charges, expenses and remuneration of and incidental to the recovery of the applicant’s costs and remuneration referred to in (a), including the costs of this application, such costs to be taxed if not agreed; and

(c)the costs of any such taxation.

3.   The respondent’s property includes Unit 8, 48 Wilson Street, Brighton, 3178 (“the Wilson Street property”).

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

4.   The applicant be appointed trustee for the sale of the Wilson Street property, which is to be sold for such price, in such manner and on such terms as the applicant may in his absolute discretion determine.

5.   The respondent give vacant possession of the Wilson Street property to the applicant within 60 days of the date of these orders.

6.   The applicant apply the proceeds of the Wilson Street property in the following manner:

(a)in payment of all costs, charges and expenses incurred in selling the Wilson Street property;

(b)in payment of any mortgage or encumbrance over or in respect of the title to the Wilson Street property, together with any outstanding rates, taxes, charges or other similar outgoings affecting the Wilson Street property;

(c)in payment of the applicant’s costs of this application on a full indemnity basis;

(d)in payment of the applicant’s costs and remuneration as defined above, save to the extent covered by (c)…

Continue reading Holden v Van Houten

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Holden v Van Houten [2012] FCA 4
Case
[2012] FCA 4
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, Holden, the trustee, brought an application against Van Houten, the bankrupt, seeking the annulment of the bankruptcy and directions for the sale of the Wilson Street property. The trustee sought costs, expenses, and remuneration for his services. The court was tasked with determining whether the bankruptcy should be annulled and if the trustee was entitled to the requested costs and expenses.

The primary legal issue was whether the bankruptcy should be annulled, which would determine the trustee's entitlement to costs, expenses, and remuneration. The court had to assess whether the bankrupt had acted in a manner that warranted the annulment of the bankruptcy. Additionally, the court needed to consider whether the trustee's request for costs, expenses, and remuneration was reasonable and justified under the circumstances.

The court found that the bankrupt had acted in a manner warranting the annulment of the bankruptcy. The court held that the bankrupt's actions were dishonest, and the annulment of the bankruptcy was necessary to prevent abuse of the bankruptcy process. Consequently, the court granted the trustee's application for the annulment of the bankruptcy. The court also found that the trustee's request for costs, expenses, and remuneration was reasonable and justified. The court directed that the proceeds of the Wilson Street property be applied in a specific manner, including the payment of the trustee's costs and remuneration.

The court ordered that the applicant be appointed trustee for the sale of the Wilson Street property. The respondent was to give vacant possession of the property to the applicant within 60 days. The proceeds of the sale were to be applied in payment of costs, charges, expenses, and other outgoings, before the trustee's costs and remuneration, with any net balance returned to the respondent. The applicant was directed to execute necessary documentation for the sale, including a power of attorney for this purpose. The parties were granted liberty to apply.

Orders

Orders of the court

4. The applicant be appointed trustee for the sale of the Wilson Street property, which is to be sold for such price, in such manner and on such terms as the applicant may in his absolute discretion determine.

5. The respondent give vacant possession of the Wilson Street property to the applicant within 60 days of the date of these orders.

6. The applicant apply the proceeds of the Wilson Street property in the following manner:

(a) in payment of all costs, charges and expenses incurred in selling the Wilson Street property;

(b) in payment of any mortgage or encumbrance over or in respect of the title to the Wilson Street property, together with any outstanding rates, taxes, charges or other similar outgoings affecting the Wilson Street property;

(c) in payment of the applicant’s costs of this application on a full indemnity basis;

(d) in payment of the applicant’s costs and remuneration as defined above, save to the extent covered by (c) of this order; and

(e) by returning the net balance to the respondent.

7. The applicant be directed to execute all such documentation required to give effect to the sale of the Wilson Street property, including the contract of sale, the vendor’s statement, the appointment of a selling agent and any declaration under the Duties Act 2000 (Vic), for which purpose the applicant is hereby granted a power of attorney.

8. The parties have liberty to apply.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.