DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Heron v Baker [2011] QDC 299
PARTIES:
ROBYN MYRA HERON
(Applicant)v
KIM BAKER
(Respondent)FILE NO:
23/2010
DIVISION:
Civil
PROCEEDING:
Application for Criminal Compensation
ORIGINATING COURT:
Beenleigh
DELIVERED ON:
23 November 2011
DELIVERED AT:
Beenleigh
HEARING DATE:
28 October 2011
JUDGE:
Dearden DCJ
ORDER:
That the respondent Kim Baker pay the applicant Robyn Myra Heron the sum of $23,250.
CATCHWORDS:
Application – criminal compensation – assault occasioning bodily harm – bruising/laceration – mental or nervous shock
LEGISLATION:
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) ss. 21, 25(7) & 40(1)
Victims of Crime Assistance Act 2009 (Qld) ss. 154 & 155
CASES:
COUNSEL:
Ms F Muirhead (solicitor) for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
Introduction
The respondent, Kim Baker, pleaded guilty in the District Court, Beenleigh on 19 August 2009 to one count of assault occasioning bodily harm on the applicant, Robyn Heron, as well as other counts of attempted arson, dangerous operation of a motor vehicle, wilful damage (two charges) and serious assault (on a police officer).
In respect of count 1 (the only count relevant to the “person”[1] of the applicant) the respondent was sentenced to nine months imprisonment, concurrent, wholly suspended with an operational period of three years, on 18 November 2009.[2]
[1] COVA s.21.
[2] Exhibit A (Certificate of Indictment), Affidavit of Melissa Lo, affirmed 13 May 2011.
Facts
The applicant and respondent had been in a relationship for approximately ten years, although at the time of the relevant incident (12 March 2008) the applicant and respondent were no longer in that relationship. The schedule of facts states as follows:-
“At approximately 2.15 pm on 12 March 2008 the [applicant] received text messages from the [respondent]. In the messages, the [respondent] requested that the [applicant] return property. After receiving the messages, the [applicant] collected the [respondent’s] belongings and put them in a plastic bag. The [applicant] sent a text message to the [respondent] advising that the property was ready for collection and requesting some property that the [respondent] had.
The [respondent] then attended the [applicant’s] house. As the [respondent] was walking up the driveway, the [applicant] asked “where is my stuff?” The [respondent] replied that she had not had time to gather the [applicant’s] property. The [respondent] then reached and grabbed the plastic bag that the [applicant] was holding. The [applicant] gripped on to the plastic bag. The [respondent] held the [applicant] with her right arm and hit the [applicant] with her left arm. The [applicant] grabbed the [respondent] at the back of her hair with her right hand and forced the [respondent’s] face down on to the car bonnet to prevent the [respondent] from hitting her. The [respondent] then left in her car.[3]”
[3] Exhibit C (Schedule of Facts), Affidavit of Melissa Lo affirmed 13 May 2011.
Injuries
The applicant suffered…
Continue reading Heron v Baker
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Heron v Baker [2011] QDC 299
- Case
- [2011] QDC 299
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
That the respondent Kim Baker pay the applicant Robyn Myra Heron the sum of $23,250.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.