Heng v (Australia) Pty Ltd v Qi Wang - [2008] FCA 1146

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Heng V (Australia) Pty Ltd v Qi Wang [2008] FCA 1146
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(1A)
Federal Court Rules O 52 r 5(2)
HENG V (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD ACN 101 665 785 and TIANFU LI v QI WANG
VID 304 OF 2008
GRAY J
30 JUNE 2008
MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 304 OF 2008

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

HENG V (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD ACN 101 665 785
First Applicant

TIANFU LI
Second Applicant

AND:

QI WANG
Respondent

JUDGE:

GRAY J

DATE OF ORDER:

30 JUNE 2008

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time for applying for leave to appeal from the judgments of the Federal Magistrates Court, given on 1 April and 14 April 2008, be extended to 8 May 2008 and 26 June 2008 respectively.
2.Leave to appeal from the judgments of the Federal Magistrates Court of 1 April 2008 and 14 April 2008 be granted.
3.On or before 7 July 2008, the appellants file and serve a notice of appeal relating to the judgment of 1 April 2008.
4.The draft notice of appeal, filed on 26 June 2008, stand as the appellants’ notice of appeal relating to the judgment of 14 April 2008.
5.The parties attend before a registrar on a date to be fixed by the registrar for the purpose of settling the index to the appeal book.
6.The registrar fix dates for the filing of:
(a) the appeal book; and
(b) written outlines of submissions on the appeals.
7.The appeals be listed for hearing on a date to be fixed, after the filing of outlines of submissions.

8. The appellants pay the respondent’s costs of the applications for enlargements of time and leave to appeal, and of today.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 304 OF 2008

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

HENG V (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD ACN 101 665 785
First Applicant

TIANFU LI
Second Applicant

AND:

QI WANG
Respondent

JUDGE:

GRAY J

DATE:

30 JUNE 2008

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Before the Court are applications for leave to appeal from two judgments of the Federal Magistrates Court, given on 1 April and 14 April 2008 respectively. In each case, there is also an application to enlarge the time fixed by O 52 r 5(2) of the Federal Court Rules for the making of an application for leave to appeal from a judgment of a court other than this Court.
On 6 May 2008 the applicants (who are referred to in these reasons for judgment as “the appellants”, for the sake of convenience) filed a notice of appeal which stated that they wished to appeal from the orders given on 1 April, 14 April and 15 April 2008. There seems to be little doubt that…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Heng v (Australia) Pty Ltd v Qi Wang and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2008] FCA 1146
Decision Date: 30 June 2008

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Heng v (Australia) Pty Ltd v Qi Wang involved a dispute between the plaintiffs, Heng v (Australia) Pty Ltd, and the defendant, Qi Wang, before the Federal Court. The plaintiffs sought to appeal judgments from the Federal Magistrates Court, which had been delivered on 1 April and 14 April 2008. The plaintiffs argued that the Federal Magistrates Court had erred in its handling of the proceedings, particularly in its assessment of evidence and application of the law. The central legal issues before the court were whether the Federal Magistrates Court had made errors in its findings and whether the plaintiffs had grounds to appeal the judgments rendered on the specified dates.

The court considered the plaintiffs’ arguments regarding the alleged errors in the Federal Magistrates Court’s decisions and examined whether these errors warranted an appeal. The court found that the plaintiffs had demonstrated sufficient grounds to appeal, particularly in relation to the handling of evidence and the interpretation of legal principles. Consequently, the court granted the plaintiffs leave to appeal and extended the time limits for filing notices of appeal and other procedural steps. The court also outlined the procedural steps required for the appeals to proceed, including the fixing of dates for the filing of appeal books, written submissions, and the hearing of the appeals.

In granting the appeal, the court ordered that the plaintiffs must file a notice of appeal regarding the judgment of 1 April 2008 by 7 July 2008 and that the draft notice of appeal filed on 26 June 2008 be treated as the notice of appeal for the judgment of 14 April 2008. The parties were directed to attend before a registrar to settle the index to the appeal book, and the registrar was tasked with setting dates for filing the appeal book and written outlines of submissions. The appeals were to be listed for hearing after the submission of these outlines. Finally, the court ordered that the plaintiffs pay the respondent’s costs associated with the applications for extensions of time and leave to appeal, as well as the costs of the hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The time for applying for leave to appeal from the judgments of the Federal Magistrates Court, given on 1 April and 14 April 2008, be extended to 8 May 2008 and 26 June 2008 respectively.

2. Leave to appeal from the judgments of the Federal Magistrates Court of 1 April 2008 and 14 April 2008 be granted.

3. On or before 7 July 2008, the appellants file and serve a notice of appeal relating to the judgment of 1 April 2008.

4. The draft notice of appeal, filed on 26 June 2008, stand as the appellants’ notice of appeal relating to the judgment of 14 April 2008.

5. The parties attend before a registrar on a date to be fixed by the registrar for the purpose of settling the index to the appeal book.

6. The registrar fix dates for the filing of:

(a) the appeal book; and

(b) written outlines of submissions on the appeals.

7. The appeals be listed for hearing on a date to be fixed, after the filing of outlines of submissions.

8. The appellants pay the respondent’s costs of the applications for enlargements of time and leave to appeal, and of today.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

GRAY J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: GRAY J

Full text does not contain this section.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY	VID 304 OF 2008

JUDGE:	GRAY J
DATE OF ORDER:	30 JUNE 2008
WHERE MADE:	MELBOURNE

JUDGE:	GRAY J
DATE:	30 JUNE 2008
PLACE:	MELBOURNE