Hemiro and Ramos and Ors
Case
•
[2018] FCCA 1425
•17 October 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hemiro and Ramos and Ors [2018] FCCA 1425
[2018] FCCA 1425
17 October 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties to this proceeding were Hemiro (the applicant) and Ramos and Ors (the respondents). The dispute concerned an application for an apprehended domestic violence order (ADVO) made by the applicant against the respondents. The matter was heard in the Local Court of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had established, on the balance of probabilities, that the respondents had engaged in conduct that constituted a domestic violence situation as defined by the relevant legislation. This involved assessing the nature of the relationship between the parties and the alleged acts of violence or intimidation.
Judge McGuire found that the applicant had not discharged the onus of proof required to establish the grounds for an ADVO. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and concluded that the applicant had failed to demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that the respondents had engaged in conduct that placed the applicant in reasonable fear for their safety or that constituted intimidation. Consequently, the application for the ADVO was dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had established, on the balance of probabilities, that the respondents had engaged in conduct that constituted a domestic violence situation as defined by the relevant legislation. This involved assessing the nature of the relationship between the parties and the alleged acts of violence or intimidation.
Judge McGuire found that the applicant had not discharged the onus of proof required to establish the grounds for an ADVO. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and concluded that the applicant had failed to demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that the respondents had engaged in conduct that placed the applicant in reasonable fear for their safety or that constituted intimidation. Consequently, the application for the ADVO was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
-
Natural Justice
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
3
Re F: Litigants in person guidelines
[2001] FamCA 348
Calverley v Green
[1984] HCA 81