District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Heesom v ASP Ship Management Pty Ltd [2020] NSWDC 653 Hearing dates: 21, 22, 23 October 2020 Date of orders: 2 November 2020 Decision date: 02 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $2,152,091.
(2) Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs.
(3) Grant leave to the parties to approach my Associate within 7 days to re-list the matter if any different costs order is sought.
Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE — worker fell down a stairway on a ship — stairway obstructed by stored hoses — whether the risk of a crew member tripping on the hoses was foreseeable — whether a reasonable person would have barricaded the port midships stairway when hoses were blocking the stairway — whether a reasonable person would have directed crew not to use stairway when hoses blocked entrance — whether or not a reasonable person would have found an alternative hose storage location
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE — comparison of degree of departure from the standard of care of the reasonable man and of the relative importance of the acts of the parties in causing the damage — alternative walkway and stairway available — need for care in negotiating an obvious hazard
QUANTUM OF DAMAGES — future economic loss – whether there was a prospect of worker getting back to work
Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 3B(1)(f)
District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 44(1)(d1)
Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 151, 151E, 151F, 151G, 151H, 151I,
151 IA, 151G, 151L
Cases Cited: Liftronic Pty Ltd v Unver [2001] HCA 24; 75 ALJR 867
March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12; 171 CLR 506
Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; 59 ALJR 492
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Terry Owen Heesom (Plaintiff)
ASP Ship Management Pty Ltd (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
B McManamey (Plaintiff)
D Kelly (Defendant)
Turner Freeman (Plaintiff)
Hicksons Lawyers (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2020/88914
Judgment
Introduction
-
On 18 September 2013 the plaintiff was employed by the defendant as the second engineer on board the “Whitnavigator”, a fuel tanker which operated in Sydney Harbour and Botany Bay. The plaintiff fell down a stairway and suffered significant injuries to his back, neck and right shoulder.
-
By a Statement of Claim filed on 20 March 2020 the plaintiff seeks damages for injuries which he alleged were sustained as a result of the negligence of the defendant employer.
-
The Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) does not apply to this claim: s 3B(1)(f). There is no monetary limit on the damages which may be awarded by this court on a claim of this nature – s 44(1)(d1) District Court Act 1973 (NSW).
-
The claim is governed by Part 5 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) (the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Heesom v ASP Ship Management Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] NSWDC 653
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the risk of a crew member tripping on the hoses was foreseeable and that a reasonable person would have barricaded the stairway when hoses were blocking it, directed crew members not to use the stairway when it was blocked, and found an alternative hose storage location. The court also found that the plaintiff was partially responsible for his injuries due to his failure to exercise reasonable care in navigating the obvious hazard. The court considered the degree of departure from the standard of care of the reasonable man and the relative importance of the acts of the parties in causing the damage. The court found that the defendant was liable for 75% of the damages and the plaintiff was liable for 25% of the damages. The court awarded the plaintiff damages of $2,152,091, reduced by 25% to reflect the plaintiff's contributory negligence. The court also ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs and granted leave to the parties to approach the Associate within 7 days to re-list the matter if any different costs order is sought.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $2,152,091.
(2) Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs.
(3) Grant leave to the parties to approach my Associate within 7 days to re-list the matter if any different costs order is sought.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.