Hatch and Vining

Case [2019] FCCA 1705


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

HATCH & VINING [2019] FCCA 1705
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Contravention application – breaches of final parenting orders – admissibility of evidence – ten counts alleged – mother admits all ten counts but argues reasonable excuse – reasonable excuse established on all counts.

Legislation:

Evidence Act 1995, ss.69, 135, 136, 140

Family Law Act 1975, ss.65DA, 70NAA, 70NAC, 70NAD, 70NAE, 70NBA, 70NCA, 70NCB
Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.25B.04

Fooks v Clark (2004) 32 Fam LR 149
In the Marriage of O’Brien (1992) 16 Fam LR 723; [1993] FLC 92-397
In the Marriage of Stevenson and Hughes (1993) 16 Fam LR 443
McClintock & Levier [2009] FamCAFC 62; (2009) FLC 93-401; 41 Fam LR 245; 233 FLR 179
Stamp & Stamp [2014] FCCA 1269
TVT & TLM [2006] FMCAfam 20
Applicant: MR HATCH
Respondent: MS VINING
File Number: SYC 1825 of 2014
Judgment of: Judge Monahan
Hearing date: 14 February 2019
Date of Last Submission: 14 February 2019
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 21 June 2019

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Campton SC
Solicitors for the Applicant: Pryor Tzannes & Wallis
Solicitors for the Respondent: Mr Frost of Horizons Family Law Centre

ORDERS

THE COURT FINDS THAT:

  1. In relation to the Application – Contravention filed by the Applicant Father on 4 December 2018,  the Respondent Mother has established a reasonable excuse for contravening the following paragraphs of the final orders dated 18 August 2014 on the following dates:

    i.Paragraph 3.2 on 22 September 2018 at 9:00am;

    ii.Paragraph 3.2 on 20 October 2018 at 9:00am;

    iii.Paragraph 3.2 on 3 November 2018 at 9:00am;

    iv.Paragraph 3.2 on 17 November 2018 at 9:00am;

    v.Paragraph 3.2 on 1 December 2018 at 9:00am;

    vi.Paragraph 4.2 on 6 October 2018 at 9:00am;

    vii.Paragraph 5 on 6 October 2018 at 9:00am;

    viii.Paragraph 8 on 19 September 2018 at 6:00pm;

    ix.Paragraph 8 on 20 September 2018 at 6:00pm; and

    x.Paragraph 8 on 21 September 2018 at 6:00pm.

AND THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The Application – Contravention filed 4 December 2018 be adjourned to a date and time to be fixed for further hearing (“the hearing”). 

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A.The purpose of the hearing is to consider further submissions relevant to the outcome of this decision.

B.The substantive parenting proceedings are listed before the Court in the duty list on 26 June 2019 at 9:30am.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Hatch & Vining is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT SYDNEY

SYC 1825 of 2014

MR HATCH

Applicant

And

MS VINING

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. This decision arises from the filing of an Application – Contravention by MR HATCH (“the father”) against MS VINING (“the mother”).  The Application – Contravention was filed on 4 December 2018 (“the application”) and came before the Court for the first time in a duty list on 13 February 2019.

  2. The relevant child of…

Continue reading Hatch and Vining

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Hatch and Vining [2019] FCCA 1705
Case
[2019] FCCA 1705
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Hatch and Vining*, heard by Judge Monahan, the dispute concerned an application by the Father alleging contravention of final parenting orders by the Mother.

The court was required to determine whether the Mother had established a reasonable excuse for contravening specific paragraphs of the final orders made on 18 August 2014, on various dates between September and December 2018.

Judge Monahan found that the Respondent Mother had indeed established a reasonable excuse for the contraventions alleged by the Applicant Father. Consequently, the court ordered that the Father's Application – Contravention filed on 4 December 2018 be adjourned for further hearing, with the purpose of considering further submissions relevant to the outcome of this decision. The substantive parenting proceedings were listed for a separate hearing on 26 June 2019.

Orders

Orders of the court

THE COURT FINDS THAT:

1.

In relation to the Application – Contravention filed by the Applicant Father on 4 December 2018, the Respondent Mother has established a reasonable excuse for contravening the following paragraphs of the final orders dated 18 August 2014 on the following dates:

i. Paragraph 3.2 on 22 September 2018 at 9:00am;

ii. Paragraph 3.2 on 20 October 2018 at 9:00am;

iii. Paragraph 3.2 on 3 November 2018 at 9:00am;

iv. Paragraph 3.2 on 17 November 2018 at 9:00am;

v. Paragraph 3.2 on 1 December 2018 at 9:00am;

vi. Paragraph 4.2 on 6 October 2018 at 9:00am;

vii. Paragraph 5 on 6 October 2018 at 9:00am;

viii. Paragraph 8 on 19 September 2018 at 6:00pm;

ix. Paragraph 8 on 20 September 2018 at 6:00pm; and

x. Paragraph 8 on 21 September 2018 at 6:00pm.

AND THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.

The Application – Contravention filed 4 December 2018 be adjourned to a date and time to be fixed for further hearing (“the hearing”).

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A. The purpose of the hearing is to consider further submissions relevant to the outcome of this decision.

B. The substantive parenting proceedings are listed before the Court in the duty list on 26 June 2019 at 9:30am.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.