FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harrold v Exactech Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1058
File number(s): NSD 1224 of 2024 Judgment of: JACKMAN J Date of judgment: 29 August 2025 Catchwords: COSTS – third party application for costs incurred in complying with subpoena – consideration of scope and application of r 24.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – principles for assessing loss or expense incurred – where costs applicant already discounted the amount charged to costs respondent – where costs respondent submits that documents received were not required by subpoena and challenges reasonableness of hours spent answering subpoena – application for legal costs of interlocutory application – costs granted Legislation: Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth)
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Health Insurance Regulations 2018 (Cth)
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Boral Limited [2007] FCA 14
Foyster v Foyster Holdings Pty Limited (in liq) [2003] NSWSC 881
Fuelxpress Limited v L M Ericsson Pty Limited (1987) 75 ALR 284
J Aron Corp v Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Limited [2004] NSWSC 996
Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection Number of paragraphs: 22 Date of hearing: 29 August 2025 Counsel for Costs Applicant: Mr S Powrie Solicitors for Costs Applicant: HWL Ebsworth Counsel for Costs Respondent: Mr M Robinson and Mr L Judd (written submissions) Solicitors for Costs Respondent: Gerard Malouf and Partners
ORDERS
NSD 1224 of 2024 BETWEEN: SIMON HARROLD
Applicant
AND: EXACTECH AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 146 150 754
First Respondent
EXACTECH INCORPORATED
Second Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JACKMAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
29 AUGUST 2025
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to r 24.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the Costs Respondent is to pay the Costs Applicant's reasonable loss and expense in complying with the subpoena to produce documents issued on 20 November 2024 in the sum of $112,262.84.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Delivered ex tempore, revised from transcriptJACKMAN J:
The Australian Orthopaedic Association (Costs Applicant) seeks orders pursuant to r 24.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) that the applicant in the substantive proceedings, Mr Simon Harrold (the Costs Respondent), pay the amount of the Costs Applicant's loss or expense incurred in complying with a subpoena to produce documents issued on 20 November 2024. Rule 24.22(1) provides as follows:
The Court may order the issuing party to pay the amount of any reasonable loss or expense incurred in complying with the subpoena.
It is common ground that I should fix the amount on a lump sum basis under subrule (2).
The subpoena required production of documents that record or evidence…
Continue reading Harrold v Exactech Australia Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Harrold v Exactech Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1058
- Case
- [2025] FCA 1058
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine the appropriate amount of costs under rule 24.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). This involved considering the principles for assessing loss or expense incurred. The court acknowledged that the applicant had already discounted the amount charged to the respondent, but the respondent argued that the documents received were not required by the subpoena and questioned the reasonableness of the hours spent in answering the subpoena. The court also considered the application for legal costs of an interlocutory application. After reviewing the submissions and evidence, the court found that the applicant was entitled to the claimed amount for the reasonable loss and expense incurred in complying with the subpoena.
The court granted the application for costs, ordering that the respondent was to pay the applicant's reasonable loss and expense in complying with the subpoena in the sum of $112,262.84. This decision was made under rule 24.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). The court's order was clear and precise, ensuring that the respondent fulfilled its financial obligations related to the subpoena.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to r 24.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the Costs Respondent is to pay the Costs Applicant's reasonable loss and expense in complying with the subpoena to produce documents issued on 20 November 2024 in the sum of $112,262.84.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.