Hansen v Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc (No 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Hansen v Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc (No 2) [2015] FCA 1283

Citation: Hansen v Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc (No 2) [2015] FCA 1283
Parties: JOCELYN HANSEN v MT MARTHA COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTRE INC and KEVIN MURPHY
File number: VID 703 of 2014
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 20 November 2015
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – Contravention of workplace agreement – Small not-for-profit enterprise – Appropriate penalties
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 546
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v BAJV Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 52
Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith (2008) 165 FCR 560
Hansen v Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc [2015] FCA 1099
Kelly v Fitzpatrick [2007] FCA 1080 (2007) 166 IR 14
Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Vista Paper Products Pty Ltd (1994) 127 ALR 673
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 30 October 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: M Willoughby-Thomas
Solicitor for the Applicant: M Willoughby-Thomas, Barrister & Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondents: J R M Tracey
Solicitor for the Respondents: Lander and Rogers

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

FAIR WORK DIVISION

VID 703 of 2014

BETWEEN:

JOCELYN HANSEN
Applicant

AND:

MT MARTHA COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTRE INC
First Respondent

KEVIN MURPHY
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

JESSUP J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 NOVEMBER 2015

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The first respondent pay a penalty of $5000 in respect of its contravention of item 2(2) of Sch 16 to the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) constituted by its contravention of cll 26.8.2 and 26.8.3 of the Neighbourhood Houses and Learning Centres Workplace Agreement 2007.

2.The said penalties be paid to the Commonwealth of Australia within 30 days.

Note:    Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

FAIR WORK DIVISION

VID 703 of 2014

BETWEEN:

JOCELYN HANSEN
Applicant

AND:

MT MARTHA COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTRE INC
First Respondent

KEVIN MURPHY
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

JESSUP J

DATE:

20 NOVEMBER 2015

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. On 15 October 2015, I gave judgment in this proceeding – Hansen v Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc [2015] FCA 1099 – reserving the question of the penalty to be imposed on the first respondent (“the respondent”) for its contravention of cll 26.8.2 and 26.8.3 of the Neighbourhood Houses and Learning Centres Workplace Agreement 2007. I have now received written submissions from the parties on that question.

  2. Rather than lay out the terms of those submissions, I propose to identify what appear to me to be the significant areas of difference exposed by them.

  3. The first matter concerns the stage at which the respondent was on notice that it was obliged to pay annual leave loading…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Hansen v Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc (No 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2015] FCA 1283
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The decision in Hansen v Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc (No 2) involved the Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc, a small not-for-profit enterprise, which was found to have contravened specific clauses of its workplace agreement. The case was heard and determined in the Federal Court of Australia. The matter was brought before the court by a former employee, Hansen, who alleged that the Centre had breached the terms of their employment by failing to comply with certain provisions of the Neighbourhood Houses and Learning Centres Workplace Agreement 2007.

The central legal issues in the case revolved around whether the Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc had indeed contravened clauses 26.8.2 and 26.8.3 of the workplace agreement, and if so, what appropriate penalties should be imposed under the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth). Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the penalties imposed were commensurate with the breach and whether the penalty of $5000 was an appropriate response given the nature and impact of the contravention.

The Federal Court found that the Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc had indeed contravened the specified clauses of the workplace agreement. The court was satisfied that the contraventions were significant enough to warrant the imposition of penalties. In reaching its decision, the court considered the seriousness of the breach, the impact on the employee, and the need to uphold the integrity of workplace agreements. As a result, the court ordered that the Centre pay a penalty of $5000 to the Commonwealth of Australia within 30 days. This penalty was deemed appropriate given the nature of the contraventions and the need to deter future breaches.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The first respondent pay a penalty of $5000 in respect of its contravention of item 2(2) of Sch 16 to the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) constituted by its contravention of cll 26.8.2 and 26.8.3 of the Neighbourhood Houses and Learning Centres Workplace Agreement 2007.

2. The said penalties be paid to the Commonwealth of Australia within 30 days.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.