HANSEN -v- HANSEN [2013] WASC 268
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2013] WASC 268 | |
| 22/07/2013 | |||
| Case No: | CIV:2036/2010 | 1 JULY 2013 | |
| Coram: | EM HEENAN J | 1/07/13 | |
| 14 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Leave to discontinue action for probate of alleged lost will Grant of letters of administration in solemn form of law to first defendant | ||
| B | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | MICHAEL PAUL HANSEN DARRYL GRANT HANSEN MATTHEW JAMES HANSEN |
Catchwords: | Probate Contentious proceedings Action for proof of alleged lost last will Defence that lost will had been destroyed with intention of revocation Counterclaim for letters of administration on intestacy Lost will naming only two adult children of the deceased as beneficiaries Widower and two adult children only persons entitled upon distribution in intestacy Family Court proceedings pending between deceased and husband at time of death seeking dissolution of marriage and property settlement Large estate in which unresolved claim for matrimonial property settlement constituted a significant asset Compromise of proceedings leading to agreement to discontinue claim to prove alleged lost will and for counterclaim for letters of administration on an intestacy to proceed Suitability of widower for appointment as administrator in view of Family Court proceedings Settlement of Family Court proceedings Principles relating to compromise of contested probate proceedings |
Legislation: | Administration Act 1904 (WA) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
Case References: | Andrews v Hogan (1952) 86 CLR 223 Darrington v Caldbeck (1980) 20 NSWLR 212 Executor Trustee Australia Ltd v Henderson [2006] SASC 82 Fisher v Fisher [1986] HCA 6; (1986) 161 CLR 438 Powell v Dinwoodie [2012] WASC 139 Re Barraclough (dec); Barraclough v Young [1967] P 1 Re Cameron; Cameron v Public Trustee [1982] WAR 55 Re Langton; Langton v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1964] P 163 Ryan v Davies Bros Ltd (1921) 29 CLR 527 Stamford v Stamford [2012] HCA 52; 87 ALJR 74 Sykes v Sykes [2010] SASC 356 Tsagouris v Bellairs [2010] SASC 147 Vandeleur v Franich [1991] 1 Qd R 481 Wheatley v Edgar [2003] WASC 118; (2003) 4 ASTLR 1 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- IN CIVIL
- Plaintiff
AND
DARRYL GRANT HANSEN
First Defendant
MATTHEW JAMES HANSEN
Fourth Defendant
Catchwords:
Probate - Contentious proceedings - Action for proof of alleged lost last will - Defence that lost will had been destroyed with intention of revocation - Counterclaim for letters of administration on intestacy - Lost will naming only two adult children of the deceased as beneficiaries - Widower and two adult children only persons entitled upon distribution in intestacy - Family Court proceedings pending between deceased and husband at time of death seeking dissolution of marriage and property settlement - Large estate in which unresolved claim for matrimonial property settlement…
Continue reading Hansen v Hansen
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- HANSEN -v- HANSEN [2013] WASC 268
- Case
- [2013] WASC 268
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Hansen v Hansen involved the estate of a deceased individual, with the widow, children, and other potential beneficiaries engaged in contentious proceedings. The widow sought to prove an alleged lost will, while the widower, who was the first defendant, counter-claimed for letters of administration on the basis of the deceased's intestacy. The deceased's will named only two adult children as beneficiaries, and in the event of intestacy, the widower and two adult children would be the only persons entitled to the distribution of the estate. The proceedings occurred against a backdrop of pending Family Court proceedings between the deceased and the widower, which included a claim for dissolution of marriage and a property settlement. The deceased's estate was substantial, and the unresolved claim for matrimonial property settlement represented a significant asset.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the widow could successfully prove the existence and content of the alleged lost will and, if not, whether the widower was suitable to be appointed as the administrator of the estate. The court had to consider the principles relating to the compromise of contested probate proceedings and the implications of the ongoing Family Court proceedings on the widower's suitability for appointment as administrator. The court also needed to determine whether the compromise reached between the parties, which led to the agreement to discontinue the claim to prove the alleged lost will and proceed with the counterclaim for letters of administration on the basis of intestacy, was appropriate and in the best interests of the estate and its beneficiaries.
The court found that the widow's claim to prove the lost will was unlikely to succeed, given the circumstances and evidence presented. The court also determined that the widower was suitable to be appointed as the administrator of the estate despite the ongoing Family Court proceedings. The court reasoned that the compromise reached between the parties was appropriate, as it avoided unnecessary costs and delays in resolving the estate and allowed the parties to focus on the Family Court proceedings. The court granted leave to discontinue the action for probate of the alleged lost will and issued letters of administration in solemn form of law to the widower. The court's decision provided clarity and direction for the resolution of the estate and allowed the parties to proceed with their respective claims in the Family Court.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the widow could successfully prove the existence and content of the alleged lost will and, if not, whether the widower was suitable to be appointed as the administrator of the estate. The court had to consider the principles relating to the compromise of contested probate proceedings and the implications of the ongoing Family Court proceedings on the widower's suitability for appointment as administrator. The court also needed to determine whether the compromise reached between the parties, which led to the agreement to discontinue the claim to prove the alleged lost will and proceed with the counterclaim for letters of administration on the basis of intestacy, was appropriate and in the best interests of the estate and its beneficiaries.
The court found that the widow's claim to prove the lost will was unlikely to succeed, given the circumstances and evidence presented. The court also determined that the widower was suitable to be appointed as the administrator of the estate despite the ongoing Family Court proceedings. The court reasoned that the compromise reached between the parties was appropriate, as it avoided unnecessary costs and delays in resolving the estate and allowed the parties to focus on the Family Court proceedings. The court granted leave to discontinue the action for probate of the alleged lost will and issued letters of administration in solemn form of law to the widower. The court's decision provided clarity and direction for the resolution of the estate and allowed the parties to proceed with their respective claims in the Family Court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Leave to discontinue action for probate of alleged lost will
Grant of letters of administration in solemn form of law to first defendant
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.