Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2011] AATA 453
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No 2010/3211, 5528
| GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION | ) | ||
| Re | JEREMY JAMES HACKETT | ||
Applicant
| And | CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY |
Respondent
DECISION
| Tribunal | Ms G Ettinger, Senior Member Dr M E C Thorpe, Member |
Date29 June 2011
PlaceSydney
| Decision | Pursuant to section 42B of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, the Tribunal dismisses Mr Hackett’s application for review, (matter 2010/3211), of the decision of CASA dated 21 April 2010 which suspended his Class 1 and Class 2 medical certificates. In matter 2010/5528, the Tribunal varies the decision under review dated 22 October 2010 as amended on 13 January 2011 by replacing the conditions imposed on Mr Hackett’s Class 1 and Class 2 medical certificates with the following conditions: A) Mr Hackett must provide to CASA the following 3 monthly blood test results; § MCV § GGT § CDT B) Mr Hackett must provide to CASA a three monthly progress report from the Qantas Medical Officer. C) Mr Hackett must provide a three monthly progress report from his psychiatrist, Dr Phillips. D) Mr Hackett’s Aviation Medical Certificates should be endorsed ‘Renew by CASA Only’. This alerts the DAME that only Aviation Medicine can revalidate the certificate after assessment of the required reports. |
...................[sgd]...........................
Ms G Ettinger
Senior Member
CATCHWORDS
CIVIL AVIATION – Applicant holder of Class 1 and Class 2 medical certificates – incident overseas following alcohol consumption with fellow crew member – whether Applicant’s reported behaviour was a manifestation of excessive alcohol consumption or a psychotic episode or drink spiking – decision under review varied – conditions varied.
Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth), s 9A
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (Cth), regs 67.010, 67.015, 67.150, 67.155, 67.180, 67.195, 67.240
Attorney-General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481
Ford v Child Support Registrar [2009] FCA 328
Re Reddish and Civil Aviation Safety Authority [1999] AATA 721
Re Williams and Australian Electoral Commission and The Greens (Party joined) (1995) 38 ALD 366
REASONS FOR DECISION
| 29 June 2011 | Ms G Ettinger, Senior Member Dr M E C Thorpe, Member |
| SUMMARY |
Mr Jeremy James Hackett is a Second Officer with Qantas, and flies internationally. On the night of 22 March 2010, while on an overnight trip in Buenos Aires, and after he had spent the evening dining with his captain and fellow flight officers, he continued to party with First Officer Simon Redhead. We are satisfied from the evidence that both men had been drinking, talking, and exchanging views. We are mindful also, that based on the subjects raised by Mr Hackett during those late night and early morning conversations, such as adverse environmental impacts on the future of the planet and his children, death and reincarnation, and Mr Hackett’s robust emphasis of his views with gestures such as banging his fist on a table, Mr Redhead became concerned for Mr Hackett’s safety. Mr Redhead, accordingly made contact with the Qantas welfare officer, Captain Steven Anderson of the Australian and International…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read HACKETT and CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] AATA 453
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to decide in this case were whether the decision of CASA to suspend Mr. Hackett’s medical certificates was unreasonable, and whether the conditions imposed on the certificates were appropriate. The court also had to determine whether Mr. Hackett’s behaviour was a manifestation of excessive alcohol consumption or a psychotic episode or drink spiking.
The court found that the decision of CASA to suspend Mr. Hackett’s medical certificates was reasonable and not flawed. The court further found that the conditions imposed on the certificates were appropriate and that Mr. Hackett’s behaviour was a manifestation of excessive alcohol consumption. The court dismissed Mr. Hackett’s application for review and varied the decision under review by replacing the conditions imposed on Mr. Hackett’s Class 1 and Class 2 medical certificates with the following conditions: Mr. Hackett must provide to CASA the following 3 monthly blood test results, a three monthly progress report from the Qantas Medical Officer, a three monthly progress report from his psychiatrist, and his Aviation Medical Certificates should be endorsed ‘Renew by CASA Only’.
Orders
Orders of the court
Pursuant to section 42B of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, the Tribunal dismisses Mr Hackett’s application for review, (matter 2010/3211), of the decision of CASA dated 21 April 2010 which suspended his Class 1 and Class 2 medical certificates.
In matter 2010/5528, the Tribunal varies the decision under review dated 22 October 2010 as amended on 13 January 2011 by replacing the conditions imposed on Mr Hackett’s Class 1 and Class 2 medical certificates with the following conditions:
A) Mr Hackett must provide to CASA the following 3 monthly blood test results;
§ MCV
§ GGT
§ CDT
B) Mr Hackett must provide to CASA a three monthly progress report from the Qantas Medical Officer.
C) Mr Hackett must provide a three monthly progress report from his psychiatrist, Dr Phillips.
D) Mr Hackett’s Aviation Medical Certificates should be endorsed ‘Renew by CASA Only’. This alerts the DAME that only Aviation Medicine can revalidate the certificate after assessment of the required reports.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.