GVW v NSWTAG

Link copied
Case Copied 31 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: GVW v NSWTAG [2025] NSWCATAD 134
Hearing dates: 8 May 2025
Date of orders: 12 June 2025
Decision date: 12 June 2025
Jurisdiction:Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division
Before: R Bailey, Senior Member
Decision:

The decision of the NSW Trustee and Guardian, dated 4 November 2024, declining the request to distribute a gift to the private managers from the proceeds of the sale of the protected person’s property is affirmed.

Catchwords:

Administrative Law

Merits Review – private managers appointed – NSW Trustee and Guardian refused a gift to the financial manager from protected person’s estate– private manager seeks review – whether gift is seasonal in nature – whether gift is for a special occasion- whether gift is a donation of the nature made by protected person when they had capacity- paramount consideration is the welfare and interests of the person subject to the financial management order – correct and preferable decision

Legislation Cited:

Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW)

NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW)

Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW)

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)

Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Holt v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31NSWLR 227

GPQ v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2025] NSWCATAD 26 (22 January 2025)

GCR v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2024] NSWCATAD 130 (20 May 2024)

Woodward v Woodward [2015] NSWSC 1793 (3 December 2015)

Texts Cited:

Powers of Attorney Second Edition 2014 Professor Gino Dal Bont

NSW Trustee and Guardian Bill 2009

Category:Principal judgment
Parties:

GVW (First Applicant)
GZK (Second Applicant)

NSW Trustee and Guardian (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Strik (Applicant)

Solicitor:
R Stormont (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2025/00030950
Publication restriction: The publication of the name of the applicants or any other person mentioned in these Reasons for Decision is prohibited pursuant to Section 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2014 (NSW).

REASONS FOR DECISION

Background

  1. This hearing concerns a request to review a decision of the NSW Trustee and Guardian (the respondent), which refused a request to distribute a gift from the estate of a protected person, who has been given the acronym GZL, to his appointed financial managers, during his lifetime.

  2. GZL is a protected person, because he is the subject of a financial management order, made by the Guardianship Division of the Tribunal, on 9 August 2021, pursuant to Section 25E of the Guardianship Act 1987 NSW (Guardianship Act).

  3. He is a 75-year-old man, who lives in an aged care facility. Until 2021, he lived in his home in Earlwood (the Earlwood property). It is not in dispute that the protected person now lives with a diagnosis of Lewy Body dementia and cognitive impairment.

  4. GZL has two adult children: a daughter, who has the acronym GVW, and a son, who has the acronym GZK. The Guardianship Division of the Tribunal has appointed GVW and GZK, on a joint and several basis, to manage their father’s affairs.

  5. This application was initially submitted only by GVW…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read GVW v NSWTAG and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2025] NSWCATAD 134
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

GVW, a private financial manager, challenged a decision by the NSW Trustee and Guardian (NSWTAG) to decline a request to distribute a gift to the private managers from the estate of a protected person. The protected person had previously made a gift to the private managers, and the dispute centred on whether this gift was to be considered customary or exceptional. The case was heard in the Administrative Division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the gift in question was seasonal in nature, a donation for a special occasion, or a donation that aligned with the protected person's usual charitable contributions when they were of sound mind. The court was required to determine the circumstances under which a gift could be made from the estate of a protected person to a private manager, considering the paramount welfare and interests of the person subject to the financial management order.

In examining the matter, the court considered the nature of the gift and the circumstances surrounding it. The court held that the gift was not a regular or seasonal occurrence, nor was it given for a special occasion. Instead, the court found that the gift was consistent with the protected person's usual charitable contributions when they had the capacity to make such decisions. However, the court held that the decision of the NSWTAG was correct and preferable, given their consideration of the welfare and interests of the protected person. The court affirmed the decision of the NSWTAG, declining the request to distribute the gift to the private managers.

No further orders were made by the court. The decision of the NSWTAG, dated 4 November 2024, declining the request to distribute a gift to the private managers from the proceeds of the sale of the protected person's property was affirmed.

Orders

Orders of the court

The decision of the NSW Trustee and Guardian, dated 4 November 2024, declining the request to distribute a gift to the private managers from the proceeds of the sale of the protected person’s property is affirmed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.