Gregory v Nominal Defendant

Case [2005] QSC 308


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Gregory v Nominal Defendant & Anor [2005] QSC 308

PARTIES:

PETER LEE GREGORY
(applicant/plaintiff)
v
THE NOMINAL DEFENDANT
(respondent/first defendant)
and
RENALDO MORELAND
(second defendant)

FILE NOS:

5656 of 2005
(Mt Isa Registry No S12 of 1999)

DIVISION:

Trial Division

PROCEEDING:

Application

DELIVERED ON:

11 August 2005

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

22 July 2005

JUDGE:

Wilson J

ORDER:

(a)       That the application for sanction of the compromise be dismissed;

(b)      That there be judgment for the plaintiff for $411,480-00 (inclusive of all statutory refunds, administration charges and other items);

(c)       That the first defendant pay the plaintiff’s costs of and incidental to the proceeding, including the costs of this application and including reserved costs if any, to be assessed on the standard basis;

(d)      That the application for the appointment of the Public Trustee of Queensland as administrator of the settlement fund be transferred to the Guardianship and Administration Tribunal;

(e)       That enforcement of the judgment be stayed pending the Guardianship and Administration Tribunal’s determination of the application for the appointment of an administrator;

(f)       That the opinion of counsel be placed in an envelope to be sealed and marked “Not to be opened without an order of the Court”;

(g)       That there be liberty to apply.

CATCHWORDS:

MENTAL HEALTH – MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF PROPERTY – GENERAL MATTERS – where plaintiff sustained head and other injuries in a motor vehicle accident – where the parties have reached a settlement agreement – where the plaintiff requires assistance in fiscal management – whether plaintiff is “a person with impaired capacity for a matter within the meaning of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000” - whether compromise of proceedings should be sanctioned – whether the Public Trustee should be appointed as the administrator of the settlement fund

Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld), ss10, 12, 245, sch 2 s 1, sch 4
Public Trustee Act1978 (Qld), ss59(1), 59(1A)

Foran v Jalbao Pty Limited [2001] QSC 042, cited
Grevett v McIntyre [2002] QSC 106, cited
Morris v Clair [2004] QSC 127, cited
Welland v Payne [2000] QSC 431, cited

COUNSEL:

KD Dorney QC for the applicant plaintiff

S Read (articled clerk, by leave) for the respondent first defendant

SOLICITORS:

VR Moffatt & Associates for the applicant plaintiff
Gadens Lawyers for the respondent first defendant

  1. WILSON J: This is an application that the compromise of a proceeding be sanctioned and that the Public Trustee of Queensland be appointed as the administrator of the settlement fund pursuant to ss 245 and 12 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000.

  1. The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident outside Doomadgee on 5 December 1992, when he was aged almost 14 years. In June 1999 he commenced this proceeding for damages for personal injuries. It has been compromised on terms that the first defendant pay him $411,480-00 (inclusive of all statutory refunds, administration charges and other items), together with costs to be assessed on…

Continue reading Gregory v Nominal Defendant

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Gregory v Nominal Defendant [2005] QSC 308
Case
[2005] QSC 308
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Gregory v Nominal Defendant involved the plaintiff, who had sustained significant injuries in a motor vehicle accident, and a nominal defendant. The dispute centred around the management of the settlement fund arising from the accident, and whether the plaintiff, who required assistance in fiscal management due to his injuries, qualified as "a person with impaired capacity for a matter within the meaning of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000." The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the compromise of the proceedings should be sanctioned and whether the Public Trustee of Queensland should be appointed as the administrator of the settlement fund. The court had to consider the implications of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 and the circumstances of the plaintiff's capacity to manage his own affairs.

In its reasoning, the court dismissed the application for sanction of the compromise, noting that the settlement amount was fair and reasonable, and that the plaintiff's capacity to manage his own affairs was not in question with respect to the compromise itself. However, the court found that the appointment of the Public Trustee as the administrator of the settlement fund should not be made by the court but rather by the Guardianship and Administration Tribunal. Consequently, the application for the Public Trustee's appointment was transferred to the Tribunal. The court also ordered that enforcement of the judgment be stayed pending the Tribunal's determination. Furthermore, the court ordered that the opinion of counsel regarding the plaintiff's capacity be sealed and that there be liberty to apply for further orders.

The final orders of the court were that the application for sanction of the compromise be dismissed, that judgment be entered for the plaintiff in the amount of $411,480.00, that the nominal defendant pay the plaintiff's costs, that the application for the appointment of the Public Trustee be transferred to the Tribunal, that enforcement of the judgment be stayed, and that the opinion of counsel be sealed. The court also granted liberty to apply for further orders.

Orders

Orders of the court

(a) That the application for sanction of the compromise be dismissed;

(b) That there be judgment for the plaintiff for $411,480-00 (inclusive of all statutory refunds, administration charges and other items);

(c) That the first defendant pay the plaintiff’s costs of and incidental to the proceeding, including the costs of this application and including reserved costs if any, to be assessed on the standard basis;

(d) That the application for the appointment of the Public Trustee of Queensland as administrator of the settlement fund be transferred to the Guardianship and Administration Tribunal;

(e) That enforcement of the judgment be stayed pending the Guardianship and Administration Tribunal’s determination of the application for the appointment of an administrator;

(f) That the opinion of counsel be placed in an envelope to be sealed and marked “Not to be opened without an order of the Court”;

(g) That there be liberty to apply.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.