Goodwin v Morgan

Case [2021] NSWCATCD 4


Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Goodwin v Morgan [2021] NSWCATCD 4
Hearing dates: 23 February 2021
Date of orders: 7 May 2021
Decision date: 07 May 2021
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: S Hanstein, Member
Decision:

The landlord is to pay the tenant the sum of $2,371.45 within 14 days of the date of this decision.

Catchwords:

RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES – Landlord’s obligation – Reasonable state of repair - Breach – Compensation

Legislation Cited:

Residential Tenancies Act 2010

Cases Cited:

Murphy v Pitt [2017] NSWCATCD 44

Texts Cited:

None

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Sharon Goodwin (applicant)
Mary Morgan (respondent)
Representation: Applicant in person, Ms Ekert for the respondent
File Number(s): RT 20/45819
Publication restriction: Nil

reasons for decision

  1. The applicant and the respondent were, respectively, the tenant and the landlord under a residential tenancy agreement. The first tenancy agreement between the parties commenced in March 2018. Most recently, a new tenancy agreement was entered into between the parties commencing on 2 April 2020, with a fixed term to 31 March 2021. The rental was $480 per week.

  2. The tenant lodged this application with the Tribunal on 2 November 2020, claiming compensation for the landlord’s failure to maintain the premises in a reasonable state of repair and a rent reduction or partial rent abatement because the premises were partly uninhabitable following a storm event on 26 October 2020.

  3. The tenancy terminated on 9 November 2020, when the tenant vacated the premises. No break fee was claimed by the landlord.

Legislation and legal principles

  1. Relevant sections of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (“Act”) are as follows.

  2. Section 43(2) of the Act provides:

(2) Premises unusable The rent payable under a residential tenancy agreement abates if residential premises under a residential tenancy agreement are—

(a) otherwise than as a result of a breach of an agreement, destroyed or become wholly or partly uninhabitable, or

(b) cease to be lawfully usable as a residence, or

(c) appropriated or acquired by any authority by compulsory process.

  1. Section 63(1) of the Act provides:

63 Landlord’s general obligation

(1) A landlord must provide and maintain the residential premises in a reasonable state of repair, having regard to the age of, rent payable for and prospective life of the premises.

  1. The Tribunal must not determine that a landlord has breached this obligation unless it is satisfied that the landlord had notice of the need for the repair or ought reasonably to have known of the need for the repair, and the landlord failed to act with reasonable diligence to have the repair carried out.

  2. In Murphy v Pitt [2017] NSWCATCD 44, the Tribunal noted, at [28]:

In determining damages to the tenants, the Tribunal must apply the guiding principle of putting the party in the same position it would have been, as far as money can, as if the contract had been performed, and not in a better or worse position (Commonwealth v Amman Aviation Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 54,

Continue reading Goodwin v Morgan

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Goodwin v Morgan [2021] NSWCATCD 4
Case
[2021] NSWCATCD 4
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Goodwin v Morgan involved a dispute between a tenant, Goodwin, and a landlord, Morgan, regarding the condition of a residential property. The matter was heard in the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales. The tenant alleged that the landlord had failed to maintain the property in a reasonable state of repair, causing harm to the tenant's health and wellbeing, and sought compensation for the breach of the landlord's obligations.

The legal issues before the tribunal included whether the landlord had breached their duty to maintain the property in a reasonable state of repair and, if so, whether the tenant was entitled to compensation. The tribunal considered evidence from both parties regarding the state of the property at the time of the tenancy, the landlord's efforts to maintain the property, and the impact of the condition of the property on the tenant's health and wellbeing.

The tribunal found that the landlord had breached their obligation to maintain the property in a reasonable state of repair, as the evidence showed that the property was in a poor condition at the start of the tenancy and that the landlord had failed to address significant issues such as leaks, mould, and structural damage. The tribunal also found that the tenant had suffered harm as a result of the condition of the property, including respiratory problems and stress. Accordingly, the tribunal ordered the landlord to pay the tenant compensation in the amount of $2,371.45, to be paid within 14 days of the decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

The landlord is to pay the tenant the sum of $2,371.45 within 14 days of the date of this decision.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.