Goodwin and Goodwin

Case [2018] FCCA 385


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GOODWIN & GOODWIN [2018] FCCA 385
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Property proceedings – case concerns farming family – application for adjournment in anticipation of amendment of claim and joinder of parties – proceedings on foot since August 2016 – competing applications fixed for trial on 22 & 23 February 2018 – trial dates allocated in early 2017 – after filing of trial affidavits wife applies to adjourn trial and join husband’s parents as parties – wife further seeks to file amended application alleging existence of constructive trust in respect of farming lands owned by husband’s parents – wife alleges she acted in response to representations made by husband’s parents in respect of transfer of farming land to her and the husband on the retirement of the parents – application for adjournment made fourteen days prior to date scheduled for trial – husband opposes application – balance of prejudice – case management principles – matters to be considered – matters relating to transfer of proceedings to Family Court.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.3(2), 8(3), 39, 45, 50(1)

Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, rr.7.01; 7.03; 8.02; 11.01; 11.03; 11.04

Cases cited:
Rodda & Anor v Ian Rodda Pty Ltd & Anor [2015] SASC 95
Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175
Applicant: MS GOODWIN
Respondent: MR GOODWIN
File Number: ADC 3115 of 2016
Judgment of: Judge Brown
Hearing date: 15 February 2018
Date of Last Submission: 15 February 2018
Delivered at: Adelaide
Delivered on: 19 February 2018

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Richards
Solicitors for the Applicant: Duncan Basheer Hannon
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Dillon
Solicitors for the Respondent: Combes & Co

ORDERS

  1. The trial dates of 22 and 23 February 2018 be vacated.

  2. The husband and Mr and Mrs Goodwin Senior file any response and affidavit in support in respect of the joinder application within 28 days of today’s date.

  3. The proceedings be fixed for further interlocutory hearing regarding the joinder application and whether the proceedings should be transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Adelaide and any other incidental matter on 3 May 2018 at 2:15pm (2 hours allowed).

  4. The husband’s costs of this application and thrown away in respect of the adjourned trial be otherwise reserved.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Goodwin & Goodwin is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT ADELAIDE

ADC 3115 of 2016

MS GOODWIN

Applicant

And

MR GOODWIN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. This is an application for adjournment.  It is opposed.  It is not usual practice to provide extensive reasons in respect of such applications, particularly in this court, which is a high volume first instance court dealing with less complicated matters within Federal jurisdiction, particularly in family law. 

  2. However, this particular adjournment application is finely balanced and the implications of either granting the adjournment or refusing it will…

Continue reading Goodwin and Goodwin

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Goodwin and Goodwin [2018] FCCA 385
Case
[2018] FCCA 385
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Goodwin and Goodwin*, heard before Judge Brown, the dispute concerned an application for joinder of Mr and Mrs Goodwin Senior into existing proceedings. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the original parties, the husband and wife, is not detailed, but the interlocutory application brought by the wife sought to involve the parents of the husband.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether Mr and Mrs Goodwin Senior should be joined as parties to the proceedings, and consequently, whether the proceedings should be transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Adelaide. The court was also required to consider any other incidental matters arising from these applications.

The court ordered that the trial dates previously set for 22 and 23 February 2018 be vacated. It directed that the husband and Mr and Mrs Goodwin Senior file any response and supporting affidavit concerning the joinder application within 28 days. A further interlocutory hearing was scheduled for 3 May 2018 to address the joinder application, the potential transfer of proceedings to the Family Court of Australia at Adelaide, and any other related matters. The costs of this application and the costs incurred due to the adjourned trial were reserved.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The trial dates of 22 and 23 February 2018 be vacated.

2.

The husband and Mr and Mrs Goodwin Senior file any response and affidavit in support in respect of the joinder application within 28 days of today’s date.

3.

The proceedings be fixed for further interlocutory hearing regarding the joinder application and whether the proceedings should be transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Adelaide and any other incidental matter on 3 May 2018 at 2:15pm (2 hours allowed).

4.

The husband’s costs of this application and thrown away in respect of the adjourned trial be otherwise reserved.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.