FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gladstone (Trustee) v Digrigoli [2016] FCA 1136
File number: QUD 541 of 2016 Judge: RANGIAH J Date of judgment: 8 September 2016 Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – foreign proceedings recognised under the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency – recognition of United States proceeding as foreign proceeding – identification of centre of main interest – recognition of foreign main proceeding Legislation: Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) ss 6, 10 and 13
Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth) rr 14.07 and 14.08
UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency Arts 2, 4, 6, 15, 16 and 17
Cases cited: Gainsford v Tannenbaum (2012) 216 FCR 543
Date of hearing: 8 September 2016 Registry: Queensland Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 22 Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr S Butler with Ms J Humphreys of McCullough Robertson Lawyers Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear ORDERS
QUD 541 of 2016 BETWEEN: LESLIE THERESE GLADSTONE IN HER CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR THE ESTATE OF SILVANA DIGRIGOLI APPOINTED UNDER CHAPTER 7 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE (US)
Applicant
AND: SILVANA DIGRIGOLI
Respondent
JUDGE:
RANGIAH J
DATE OF ORDER:
8 SEPTEMBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 6 of the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) (“the Act”) and paragraph 1 of Art 17 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (“the Model Law”), the proceeding of the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California, case no. 11-00806-LA7, Re Silvana Digrigoli (“the foreign proceeding”), be recognised as a foreign proceeding.
2.Pursuant to s 6 of the Act and paragraph 2(a) of Art 17 of the Model Law, the foreign proceeding be recognised as a foreign main proceeding.
3.The following documents be served in accordance with order 5 of these orders:
(a)a notice in accordance with Form B21 of the Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth);
(b)a copy of these orders; and
(c)a copy of the interim application filed on 15 July 2016.
4.The documents referred to in order 3 of these orders are to be served by 28 September 2016:
(a)on the respondent by prepaid post to 3925 Trace Road, Spring Valley, California, 91978, USA;
(b)on Santo Digrigoli by prepaid post to 295 East Main Street, El Cajon, California, 92020, USA;
(c)on the Public Trustee of Queensland by delivery to 444 Queen Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000; and
(d)by prepaid post on the persons and entities listed in Annexure B to the amended application filed 27 July 2016 to their addresses listed in that document.
5.A notice in accordance with Form B21 of the Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules be published in “The Daily Transcript” circulating in San Diego by 28 September 2016.
6.The interim application be listed for hearing on 7 October 2016 at 10.15 am.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules
Continue reading Gladstone (Trustee) v Digrigoli
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Gladstone (Trustee) v Digrigoli [2016] FCA 1136
- Case
- [2016] FCA 1136
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the identification of the centre of main interest (COMI) of Silvana Digrigoli. This determination was crucial as it would establish whether the foreign proceeding should be recognised as a main proceeding, thereby allowing the Australian court to grant relief that would be effective in the jurisdiction of the foreign court. The court needed to assess the evidence provided to determine the location of Digrigoli's COMI at the commencement of the foreign proceeding, which would dictate whether the foreign proceeding was a main proceeding.
The court found that the United States proceeding was indeed a foreign proceeding under the Act and the Model Law. In making this determination, the court considered the evidence regarding Digrigoli's place of residence and business operations, and concluded that her COMI was located in the United States. Consequently, the court recognised the foreign proceeding as a foreign main proceeding. The court also ordered the service of various documents to relevant parties and publication of a notice in a local newspaper in San Diego. The interim application was listed for a hearing.
The court made orders recognising the foreign proceeding as a foreign main proceeding, directing the service of specified documents to the relevant parties, and ordering the publication of a notice in a local newspaper in San Diego. The interim application was listed for a hearing on 7 October 2016.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 6 of the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) (“the Act”) and paragraph 1 of Art 17 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (“the Model Law”), the proceeding of the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California, case no. 11-00806-LA7, Re Silvana Digrigoli (“the foreign proceeding”), be recognised as a foreign proceeding.
2. Pursuant to s 6 of the Act and paragraph 2(a) of Art 17 of the Model Law, the foreign proceeding be recognised as a foreign main proceeding.
3. The following documents be served in accordance with order 5 of these orders:
(a) a notice in accordance with Form B21 of the Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth);
(b) a copy of these orders; and
(c) a copy of the interim application filed on 15 July 2016.
4. The documents referred to in order 3 of these orders are to be served by 28 September 2016:
(a) on the respondent by prepaid post to 3925 Trace Road, Spring Valley, California, 91978, USA;
(b) on Santo Digrigoli by prepaid post to 295 East Main Street, El Cajon, California, 92020, USA;
(c) on the Public Trustee of Queensland by delivery to 444 Queen Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000; and
(d) by prepaid post on the persons and entities listed in Annexure B to the amended application filed 27 July 2016 to their addresses listed in that document.
5. A notice in accordance with Form B21 of the Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules be published in “The Daily Transcript” circulating in San Diego by 28 September 2016.
6. The interim application be listed for hearing on 7 October 2016 at 10.15 am.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.