Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gill v Chen [2022] NSWLEC 1748 Hearing dates: 19 June 2023 Date of orders: 26 September 2023 Decision date: 26 September 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The orders of the Court are:
(1) See orders at [34].
Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – rhizomatous bamboo – did roots damage pool pipes – hinderance in corporal hereditaments – orders made for bamboo
Legislation Cited: The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Pt 2; s 7, 8, 9, 10, 12
Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Regulation 2007, s 4
Cases Cited: Black v Johnson (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 513
Carter v MKTK Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 1787
Texts Cited: Safe Work Australia, Guide to Managing Risks of Tree Trimming and Removal Work, July 2016
Department of Primary Industries, “Rhizomatous bamboo (Phyllostachys species)”
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Russell Gill (Applicant)
Xuekui Chen (Respondent)Representation: R Gill (Self-represented) (Applicant)
Solicitors:
M Jaukovic (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Monte Legal (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/101881 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: Xuekui Chen, the respondent, owns a large property in Cremorne Point which is located on a slope that runs down to Shell Cove. Ms Chen’s property, which she purchased in February 2022 and leases to tenants, is bordered on both sides and at the rear by dense bamboo, about 6 m tall.
-
The applicant, Russell Gill, owns an adjacent neighbouring property and the parties share a rear boundary which extends from north, north-west to south, south-east. The properties are accessed from different streets and the applicant’s land is at a higher level than the respondent’s property, the rear of which had been excavated long ago to provide level ground for the dwelling.
-
The applicant purchased his property in 2015, completed dwelling renovations 6 years ago, and rear yard landscaping 5 years ago. Mr Gill’s property includes an inground swimming pool that was installed across the back yard around 2006, beyond which at a lower level is a triangle shaped garden between the pool and the rear boundary. The triangle shaped garden is about 3.5 m wide at the northern end and it narrows almost to a tip at the far southern end.
-
In late 2022, the applicant observed a drop in the pool water level, and upon investigating at the rear of the pool, he exposed a ruptured 50 – 75 mm PVC pipe, from which water surged. Aaron Torino, a plumber who repaired the pipe, reported bamboo roots in the pipe, which he considered had caused the pipe damage. Mr Gill said bamboo stems, which he claimed had encroached from the respondent’s property, had grown rapidly at the rear of his pool, and had also damaged a wooden staircase. Landscape gardeners removed all accessible bamboo stems and roots from the applicant’s rear garden and this required removal of almost all plants installed…
Continue reading Gill v Chen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Gill v Chen [2022] NSWLEC 1748
- Case
- [2022] NSWLEC 1748
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence presented to determine the existence and terms of the contract. It assessed the correspondence between the parties, the nature of the transaction, and the circumstances surrounding the agreement. The court concluded that a binding contract existed, outlining specific obligations for both parties. Regarding the alleged breach, the court found that Chen had failed to meet certain contractual obligations, resulting in a breach. The court then considered the extent of the breach and the financial loss incurred by Gill.
In its reasoning, the court emphasised the importance of clear contractual terms and the need for both parties to fulfill their obligations. The court held that Chen was liable for the breach and ordered compensation for the financial loss suffered by Gill. The court's decision was based on the clear evidence of the contractual obligations and the failure to meet those obligations. The court ordered Chen to pay damages to Gill, as detailed in the final orders section of the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
The orders of the Court are:
(1) See orders at [34].
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.