Reported Decision:
51 NSWLR 606
New South Wales
Court of Appeal
CITATION: GIFFORD V. STRANG PATRICK STEVEDORING PTY. LTD. [2001] NSWCA 175 FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40718/99; 40719/99; 40720/99; 40721/99 HEARING DATE(S): 2 May 2001 JUDGMENT DATE:
14 June 2001PARTIES :
Kristine Gifford - appellant (40718/99)
Darren Gifford - appellant (40721/99)
Kelly Gifford - appellant (40719/99)
Matthew Gifford - appellant (40720/99)
Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty. Ltd. - respondent in all casesJUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Ipp AJA at 76
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT
FILE NUMBER(S) :9638/97; 7309/97; 7419/97; 7323/97 LOWER COURT
JUDICIAL OFFICER :Naughton DCJ
COUNSEL: Mr. B.J. Gross QC with Mr. H.W.H. Bauer for all appellants
Mr. T.F. McKenzie with Mr. M. Wright for respondentSOLICITORS: G.H. Healey & Co. Sydney for all appellants
Gillis Delaney Brown, Sydney for respondentCATCHWORDS: Torts - Negligence - Duty of care - Mental or nervous shock - Man killed in horrific accident - Widow and children told - Claim for damages for mental injury - Whether mental or nervous shock - Whether Workers Compensation Act s.151P gives cause of action - Whether Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act excludes common law liability - Whether children have common law claim. D. LEGISLATION CITED: Workers Compensation Act 1987 ss.151, 151E, 151F, 151P CASES CITED: State of NSW v. Seedsman [2000] NSWCA 119
Scala v. Mammolitti (1965) 114 CLR 153
Mt. Isa Mines Ltd. v. Pusey (1970) 125 CLR 383
Jaensch v. Coffey (1984) 155 CLR 549
Wilks v. Haines (1991) Aust.Torts.Rep.81-078
Chiaverini v. Hockey (1993) Aust.Torts.Reps. 81-223
Coates v. Government Insurance Office (NSW) (1995) 36 NSWLR 1
Quayle v. State of New South Wales (1995) Aust. Torts Rep. 81-367
FAI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Lucre (2000) 50 NSWLR 261
Annetts v. Australian Stations Pty. Lt.d (2000) 23 WAR 35
Swan v. Williams (Demolition) Pty. Ltd. (1987) 9 NSWLR 172
Campbelltown City Council v. McKay (1989) 15 NSWLR 501
Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310
Pham v. Lawson (1997) 68 SASR 124
Petrie v. Dowling [1992] 1 Qd.R. 284DECISION: Appeals dismissed with costs
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40718/99 DC 9638/97
CA 40719/99 DC 7309/97
CA 40720/99 DC 7419/97
CA 40721/99 DC 7323/97
Thursday 14 June 2001
1 HANDLEY JA: I agree with Hodgson JA and for the reasons he has given that this appeal should be dismissed with costs. However I prefer at this stage to express no views on the matters he discusses in paragraphs 67 to 73 of his reasons dealing with some aspects of s.4(1)(a) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1944 which, as he recognises, do not squarely arise for decision in this case.
2 HODGSON JA: On 14th June 1990, the late Barry Gifford was killed in an accident in the course of his employment by the respondent Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty. Limited.…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Gifford v Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2001] NSWCA 175
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the plaintiffs had suffered compensable mental or nervous shock, whether section 151P of the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* (NSW) provided a cause of action for damages for mental injury, and whether the *Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1944* (NSW) excluded common law liability in this context. The court also had to determine whether the children of the deceased worker possessed a common law claim for damages.
The Court of Appeal held that the plaintiffs had established a claim for mental injury. The court reasoned that the employer owed a duty of care to the worker's family to avoid causing them psychiatric injury, and that this duty extended to the circumstances of the notification of the worker's death. The court found that the *Workers Compensation Act* did not preclude common law claims for damages for psychiatric injury, and that the *Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act* did not exclude such common law liability. The court affirmed that the children had a valid common law claim.
The appeals were dismissed with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeals dismissed with costs
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.