Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWCA 206 Hearing dates: 29 July 2016 Decision date: 12 August 2016 Before: Beazley P;
Simpson JADecision: (1) Extend time for filing the summons for leave to appeal to 8 June 2016.
(2) Summons for leave to appeal refused.Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – circumstances where grant of leave appropriate – discretionary determination – relevance of sum in issue Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)Cases Cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc [1981] HCA 39; 148 CLR 170
Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164
BHP Petroleum Pty Ltd v Oil Basins Ltd [1985] VR 756
Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69
Clarke v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 27
Collier v Lancer (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 186
Darrell Lea (Vic) Pty Ltd v Union Assurance Society of Australia Ltd [1969] VR 401
Dunn v Ross Lamb Motors (1978) 1 NSWLR 26
House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499
Jaycar Pty Limited v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284
Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1572; 104 FCR 564
Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274
Minogue v Williams (2000) 60 ALD 366
Niemann v Electronic Industries Ltd [1978] VR 431
Wilson v Tetley [2003] NSWCA 124
Zelden Sewell Henamast Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 56Category: Principal judgment Parties: Neville James Gibson (Applicant)
Bernard Joseph Drumm (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
In person (Applicant)
D F Elliott (Respondent)
Lander & Rogers (Respondent)
File Number(s): CA 2016/176039 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction:
- Equity Division
- Citation:
- Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWSC 570
- Date of Decision:
- 6 May 2016
- Before:
- Young AJ
- File Number(s):
- 2015/256225
Judgment
-
THE COURT: The applicant, Mr Gibson, sought leave to appeal from the decision of Young AJ ordering him to pay the respondent’s costs, on an indemnity basis and by way of a gross sum costs order of $10,170, in respect of proceedings which were not ultimately pursued by the applicant against the respondent: Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWSC 570. The applicant required an extension of time within which to file the summons seeking leave to appeal. That was not opposed and accordingly an extension of time should be granted.
-
The applicant also applied for an adjournment of the hearing of the application for leave to appeal. The bases advanced for seeking the adjournment were, essentially, that the matter had come before the Court quickly, that the date for the hearing had been set to suit the convenience of counsel for the respondent and that the applicant had not had time to fully prepare his documentation and argument.…
Continue reading Gibson v Drumm
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWCA 206
- Case
- [2016] NSWCA 206
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether leave to appeal should be granted. This involved a consideration of the circumstances in which leave to appeal is appropriate, recognising that the grant of leave is a discretionary determination. The Court also had regard to the relevance of the sum in issue in determining whether to grant leave.
The Court of Appeal considered the application for leave to appeal and the circumstances surrounding it. After weighing the relevant factors, including the sum of money involved, the Court exercised its discretion. The Court determined that leave to appeal should not be granted.
Accordingly, the Court ordered that time for filing the summons for leave to appeal be extended to 8 June 2016, but the summons for leave to appeal itself was refused.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Extend time for filing the summons for leave to appeal to 8 June 2016.
(2) Summons for leave to appeal refused.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.