Gibson v Drumm

Case [2016] NSWCA 206


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWCA 206
Hearing dates:29 July 2016
Decision date: 12 August 2016
Before: Beazley P;
Simpson JA
Decision:

(1)   Extend time for filing the summons for leave to appeal to 8 June 2016.
(2)   Summons for leave to appeal refused.

Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – circumstances where grant of leave appropriate – discretionary determination – relevance of sum in issue
Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc [1981] HCA 39; 148 CLR 170
Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164
BHP Petroleum Pty Ltd v Oil Basins Ltd [1985] VR 756
Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69
Clarke v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 27
Collier v Lancer (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 186
Darrell Lea (Vic) Pty Ltd v Union Assurance Society of Australia Ltd [1969] VR 401
Dunn v Ross Lamb Motors (1978) 1 NSWLR 26
House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499
Jaycar Pty Limited v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284
Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1572; 104 FCR 564
Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274
Minogue v Williams (2000) 60 ALD 366
Niemann v Electronic Industries Ltd [1978] VR 431
Wilson v Tetley [2003] NSWCA 124
Zelden Sewell Henamast Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 56
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Neville James Gibson (Applicant)
Bernard Joseph Drumm (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
In person (Applicant)
D F Elliott (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
Lander & Rogers (Respondent)
File Number(s):CA 2016/176039
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Equity Division
Citation:
Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWSC 570
Date of Decision:
6 May 2016
Before:
Young AJ
File Number(s):
2015/256225

Judgment

  1. THE COURT: The applicant, Mr Gibson, sought leave to appeal from the decision of Young AJ ordering him to pay the respondent’s costs, on an indemnity basis and by way of a gross sum costs order of $10,170, in respect of proceedings which were not ultimately pursued by the applicant against the respondent: Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWSC 570. The applicant required an extension of time within which to file the summons seeking leave to appeal. That was not opposed and accordingly an extension of time should be granted.

  2. The applicant also applied for an adjournment of the hearing of the application for leave to appeal. The bases advanced for seeking the adjournment were, essentially, that the matter had come before the Court quickly, that the date for the hearing had been set to suit the convenience of counsel for the respondent and that the applicant had not had time to fully prepare his documentation and argument.…

Continue reading Gibson v Drumm

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWCA 206
Case
[2016] NSWCA 206
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application for leave to appeal from a decision of the District Court of New South Wales. The applicant, Gibson, sought to appeal against a judgment that had been entered against him. The respondent was Drumm.

The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether leave to appeal should be granted. This involved a consideration of the circumstances in which leave to appeal is appropriate, recognising that the grant of leave is a discretionary determination. The Court also had regard to the relevance of the sum in issue in determining whether to grant leave.

The Court of Appeal considered the application for leave to appeal and the circumstances surrounding it. After weighing the relevant factors, including the sum of money involved, the Court exercised its discretion. The Court determined that leave to appeal should not be granted.

Accordingly, the Court ordered that time for filing the summons for leave to appeal be extended to 8 June 2016, but the summons for leave to appeal itself was refused.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Extend time for filing the summons for leave to appeal to 8 June 2016.

(2) Summons for leave to appeal refused.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.