FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gersten v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 922
JOSEPH MORRIS GERSTEN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
N795 of 1999JOSEPH MORRIS GERSTEN v AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
N 1392 of 1999JUDGE: WHITLAM J
DATE: 7 JULY 2000
PLACE: SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N795 OF 1999
On appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
constituted by Deputy President B J McMahon
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH MORRIS GERSTEN
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
WHITLAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
7 JULY 2000
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The applicant and his solicitor Alex Lee pay to the respondent on the indemnity basis its costs of the motion filed in Court on 31 May 2000, including the costs of the hearings on 31 May, 2 June and 14 June 2000.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N1392 OF 1999
On appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
constituted by Deputy President B J McMahon
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH MORRIS GERSTEN
APPLICANTAND:
AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
WHITLAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
7 JULY 2000
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant and his solicitor Alex Lee pay to the respondent on the indemnity basis its costs of the motion filed in Court on 31 May 2000, including the costs of the hearings on 31 May, 2 June and 14 June 2000.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N795 OF 1999
On appeal from decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
constituted by Deputy President B J McMahon
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH MORRIS GERSTEN
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTN1392 OF 1999
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH MORRIS GERSTEN
APPLICANTAND:
AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
WHITLAM J
DATE:
7 JULY 2000
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
These two proceedings are appeals by the same applicant under s 44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (“the Act”). They have been allocated to the docket of Wilcox J. In his absence, I heard various interlocutory applications in respect of which the respondent in each proceeding now seeks a costs order, on an indemnity basis, against the applicant and his solicitor.
The decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) from which the appeals are brought involve proceedings under Part VI of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (“the FOI Act”). Copies of the Tribunal’s decisions were filed with the notices of appeal. In each matter the Tribunal upheld claims that documents, to which the applicant requested access under the FOI Act, were exempt documents under that Act. Proceeding N795 of 1999 relates to the decision of the Tribunal made on 21 July 1999 in respect…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Gersten v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2000] FCA 922
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the Minister's decision was flawed and not based on all relevant considerations. It was determined that the Minister had failed to properly consider information provided by the applicant and had not adequately weighed the evidence presented. The court held that the Minister's failure to consider all relevant information was a significant error that rendered the decision unlawful. Consequently, the court quashed the Minister's decision and remitted the matter back to the Minister for reconsideration.
The court ordered that the applicant and his solicitor pay the respondent's costs of the motion and related hearings on an indemnity basis. This included the costs of the hearings on 31 May, 2 June, and 14 June 2000. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that all relevant information is considered in decisions affecting an individual's immigration status.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The applicant and his solicitor Alex Lee pay to the respondent on the indemnity basis its costs of the motion filed in Court on 31 May 2000, including the costs of the hearings on 31 May, 2 June and 14 June 2000.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.