TRADE MARKS ACT 1995
DECISION OF A DELEGATE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS WITH REASONS
Re:Trade mark application 2290393 (classes 9, 16, 18, 25, 28, 35, 36, 41, 43) – Timbertot – in the name of Geelong Grammar School Limited
Delegate: | Nicholas Barbey |
Representation: | Applicant: Andrew Sykes of counsel instructed by The Lantern Legal Group Pty Ltd trading as Harwood Andrews |
Decision: | 2024 ATMO 108 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – s 33 proceeding – s 44 and reg 4.15A of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth) considered – grounds for rejection established in relation to a subset of goods and services – evidence considered but not sufficient – opportunity to amend – goods and services amended – trade mark application accepted |
Background
This matter concerns an application filed by Geelong Grammar School Limited (‘Applicant’) to register the following trade mark:
Trade mark: Timbertot (‘Trade Mark’)
Number: 2290393 (‘Application’)
Priority date: 1 August 2022
Specification:[1] Class 9: (including) audio visual multimedia and teaching apparatus and instruments in this class; downloadable educational material including webcasts, podcasts, audio visual files, music files, software programs and mobile or web-based software applications; software
[1] An indicative specification is provided. The complete specification is reproduced in Annexure A to this decision.
Class 16: (including) educational materials; printed matter and printed publications; articles of stationery
Class 18: (including) bags, including school bags, book bags and sports bags; luggage; umbrellas
Class 25: (including) apparel (clothing, footwear and head gear), including without limitation, school clothing, school footwear and school head gear for students, children and young people
Class 28: (including) educational toys, playthings and sporting goods in this class; sporting apparatus
Class 35: (including) wholesaling and retailing of goods (by any means); retail services; distribution of goods (not being transport services); career planning services
Class 36: (including) fundraising services; charitable services, namely financial services; leasing of accommodation; preparing reports and other business documents in relation to the above services
Class 41: (including) educational services including schooling; provision of library services; arranging, conducting and making available online training sessions, workshops, seminars, courses, lectures, exhibits and conferences; publication of printed educational materials, statistics, research and information; training in the care of children; online publications (non-downloadable)
Class 43: (including) boarding house accommodation and hospitality services; arranging of accommodation for students; hospitality services (food and drink)
(‘Claimed GS’)
The Application was examined as required by s 31 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (‘Act’) and an examination report issued to the Applicant raising, inter alia, grounds for rejection under s 44 of the Act in respect of the following trade marks (collectively ‘Citations’):
Trade mark: TIMBER TOTS (‘59 Mark’)
Number: 1813159
Priority date: 1 December 2016
Specification:[2] Class 35: charitable services, namely organising and conducting volunteer programmes and community service projects
[2] An indicative specification is provided. The complete specification is reproduced in Annexure B to this decision.
Class 39: (including) arranging of excursions; organisation of…
Continue reading Geelong Grammar School Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Geelong Grammar School Limited [2024] ATMO 208
- Case
- [2024] ATMO 208
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed trade mark "TIMBERTOT" was deceptively similar to the registered trade mark "TIMBERTOP" for the purposes of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth). This required an assessment of the visual, aural, and conceptual similarities between the two marks, as well as consideration of the goods and services for which registration was sought and the likely perception of the relevant public.
In determining deceptive similarity, the court applied the established principles of trade mark law, which involve comparing the marks as a whole and considering the degree of resemblance and the likelihood of confusion. The court noted that while the marks shared the common element "TIMBER," the addition of "TOT" to the applicant's mark created a distinct difference. Considering the overall impression conveyed by each mark and the nature of the goods and services, the court found that the differences were sufficient to avoid a likelihood of deception or confusion in the minds of the relevant consumers.
The court therefore found that the proposed trade mark "TIMBERTOT" was not deceptively similar to the registered trade mark "TIMBERTOP" and ordered that the opposition be dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.