FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gebadi v Woosup (No 2) [2017] FCA 1467
File number(s): QUD 244 of 2016 Judge(s): GREENWOOD J Date of judgment: 7 December 2017 Catchwords: EQUITY – consideration of whether the respondents as persons constituting an applicant for the purposes of bringing a native title determination application under s 61 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) owe fiduciary duties to the holders of the common or group rights and interests comprising the particular native title claimed – consideration of that question in the context of the Ankamuthi native title determination application QUD 6158 of 1998
EQUITY – consideration of the scope of the duties owed by the respondents to the holders of the common or group rights and interests the subject of the Ankamuthi native title determination application – consideration of whether the respondents breached the duties owed to the holders of the common or group rights or interests the subject of the Ankamuthi native title determination application – consideration of the remedies to be granted in respect of such breaches
NATIVE TITLE – consideration of the relationship between the statutory arrangements under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and the circumstances in which persons constituting an applicant for the purposes of a native title determination application under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) are taken to have assumed, agreed or undertaken to act in the best interests of, and for and on behalf of, the holders of the common or group rights and interests the subject of a native title determination application
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), ss 3(a), 3(b), 4(3), 13, 24IC, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 30A, 31, 32, 33, 50(2), 56(2)(a), 57(1), 61, 66B, 223, 233 and 253 Cases cited: Breen v Williams (1996) 186 CLR 71
Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch. 1
Gebadi v Woosup [2017] FCA 347
Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101
Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) (2012) 200 FCR 196
Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41
John Alexander’s Clubs v White City (2010) 241 CLR 1
Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583
Oliver Hume South East Queensland Pty Ltd v Investa Residential Group Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 141
Re Wadi Wadi Peoples (1995) 124 FLR 110
Tate v Williamson (1866) 2 Ch. App. 55 (L.C.)
Weribone on behalf of the Mandandanji People v State of Queensland [2013] FCA 255
Weribone v Queensland (No 2) (2013) 217 FCR 189
Woosup on behalf of the Ankamuthi People #1 v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 831
Constructive Trusts, R.P. Austin in Essays in Equity, Edited by the Hon P.D. Finn, Law Book Company Limited, 1985
Contract and The Fiduciary Principle, the Hon Dr P.D. Finn, UNSW Law Journal, 1989, Vol 12, p 76
Deconstructing constructive trusts in Australia, the Hon Keith Mason (2010) 4 Journal of Equity 98
Fiduciaries: Who Are They? the late the Hon Justice B.H. McPherson CBE, April 1998,…
Continue reading Gebadi v Woosup (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Gebadi v Woosup (No 2) [2017] FCA 1467
- Case
- [2017] FCA 1467
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues centred around the nature and scope of fiduciary duties owed by the respondents to the native title claim group, particularly in the context of financial transactions and management of the group’s interests. The court had to determine whether the respondents had assumed, agreed, or undertaken to act in the best interests of the native title holders, and whether there were any breaches of those duties. Additionally, the court needed to consider appropriate remedies for any established breaches, including financial compensation and restrictions on the respondents' future actions.
Justice Gilmour concluded that the respondents did owe fiduciary duties to the native title claim group, and these duties were breached. The court held that Larry Woosup derived financial benefits from his position that should have been accounted for to the claim group. As a result, he was ordered to compensate the group for the financial benefits obtained and to pay an additional sum of $370,000 by a specified date. Furthermore, Larry Woosup was restrained from exercising any authority over accounts held by the Seven Rivers Aboriginal Corporation on behalf of the native title holders. Beverley Tamwoy was also ordered to contribute to the costs of the proceedings. The case was adjourned to a date after the specified payment deadline to allow for the implementation of these orders.
The final orders included a requirement for Larry Woosup to account for and compensate the native title claim group for financial benefits obtained through his position, a payment of $370,000, and a restriction on his ability to manage the group’s accounts. Both respondents were also ordered to pay the applicants’ costs. These orders reflect the court’s determination that fiduciary duties were breached and the need for specific remedies to address those breaches.
Orders
Orders of the court
4. Larry Woosup account to the native title claim group for the Ankamuthi claim being a native title claim group as described at [4] of the reasons published today, for the financial benefits derived by him or under his control identified in Declaration 2 and the schedule to Declaration 2.
5. Larry Woosup pay to and for the benefit of the native title claim group being the native title claim group as described at [4] of the reasons published today, an amount of $370,000 by paying that sum to Seven Rivers Aboriginal Corporation (ICN 8522) as trustee for and on behalf of the native title holders as described at [4] to the reasons published today, by 6 February 2018.
6. Larry Woosup pay the monies required to be paid by Order 4 by paying the monies into Court in these proceedings by 6 February 2018.
7. Larry Woosup and Beverley Tamwoy pay the costs of the applicants of and incidental to these proceedings including reserved costs.
8. The proceeding is adjourned to a date after 6 February 2018 to be nominated by the Federal Court.
9. Having regard to the declarations and orders made in this proceeding and the findings of fact which have given rise to those declarations and orders and having regard to the considerations described at [172] and [173] of the reasons for judgment published today, Mr Woosup is restrained from exercising any power or authority or purporting to exercise any power or authority to effect transactions of any kind on any account held by Seven Rivers Aboriginal Corporation (ICN 8522) with or at any bank or financial institution as trustee for the native title holders being the Ankamuthi People as described at [4] of the reasons for judgment published today to which any monies are or may be deposited by reason of payments made by Gulf Alumina Limited or any other party for and on behalf of the native title holders.
10. In relation to Order 9, Mr Woosup has liberty to apply on seven days’ notice to the applicants.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.