Gaynor v Burns

Case [2016] NSWCA 44


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Gaynor v Burns [2016] NSWCA 44
Hearing dates:24 February 2016
Date of orders: 16 March 2016
Decision date: 16 March 2016
Before: McColl JA, Emmett AJA
Decision:

(1)   Grant leave to appeal.

 

(2)   Applicant to file the draft notice of appeal appearing in the White Book, but excising paragraphs 8-10, within 7 days of the date of this judgment.

 

(3) Dispense with the requirement to prepare the appeal books referred to in UCPR 51.27 - 51.30.

 

(4)   Refer the appeal to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal to make directions concerning the filing of written submissions addressing the construction point and to determine what, if any, additional materials need to be included in the White Book.

 (5)   Costs of the leave application to be costs in the appeal.
Catchwords:

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Statutory appeals from administrative bodies – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – Appeal Panel – Appeals from – Where Appeal Panel included Acting District Court judge – Appeal to Court of Appeal – Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 83 – Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 48 – District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 18

PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – costs – Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 60
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
District Court Act 1973 (NSW)
Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015
Cases Cited: B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWCA 187; (2008) 74 NSWLR 481
Daykin v SAS Trustee Corporation [2001] NSWSC 58; (2001) 51 NSWLR 328
House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499
Macquarie Bank Ltd v Fociri Pty Ltd (1992) 27 NSWLR 203
Puglisi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales Appeal Panel [2001] NSWCA 298; (2001) 52 NSWLR 350
Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission [2016] NSWCA 10
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Bernard Gaynor (Applicant)
Garry Burns (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
P King (Applicant)
K Nomchong SC and D Chitty (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
Robert Balzola and Associates (Applicant)
K&L Gates (Respondent)
File Number(s):2015/251109
Publication restriction:Nil
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Jurisdiction:
Appeal Panel
Citation:
[2015] NSWCATAP
Date of Decision:
23 July 2015
Before:
Boland J, ADCJ, Deputy President,Emeritus Professor M Chesterman, Principal Member and L Robberds QC, Senior Member
File Number(s):
AP15/05125

Judgment

  1. THE COURT: By Summons seeking leave to appeal filed on 16 September 2015 (Summons), the applicant, Bernard Gaynor, sought leave to appeal pursuant to s 83(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) (CAT Act) from a decision of the Appeal Panel of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales (Boland J, ADCJ, Deputy President, Emeritus Professor M Chesterman, Principal Member and L Robberds QC, Senior Member). In that decision,…

Continue reading Gaynor v Burns

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Gaynor v Burns [2016] NSWCA 44
Case
[2016] NSWCA 44
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an appeal to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales from a decision of the Appeal Panel of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT). The applicant, Mr. Gaynor, sought leave to appeal against the Appeal Panel's decision.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the Appeal Panel, which included an Acting District Court judge, had the power to make certain orders, specifically concerning the construction of a statutory provision. This question arose in the context of an application for leave to appeal and the associated procedural requirements for filing an appeal in the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal, indicating that there was a sufficient question of law to be considered. The Court then made directions regarding the filing of the notice of appeal, dispensing with certain requirements for appeal books and referring the matter to the Registrar for further directions on written submissions and the contents of the appeal record. The costs of the leave application were reserved to be determined as part of the costs of the substantive appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Grant leave to appeal.

(2) Applicant to file the draft notice of appeal appearing in the White Book, but excising paragraphs 8-10, within 7 days of the date of this judgment.

(3) Dispense with the requirement to prepare the appeal books referred to in UCPR 51.27 - 51.30.

(4) Refer the appeal to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal to make directions concerning the filing of written submissions addressing the construction point and to determine what, if any, additional materials need to be included in the White Book.

(5) Costs of the leave application to be costs in the appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.