FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Garner v Central Innovation Pty Limited [2022] FCA 711
Appeal from: Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner (No 4) [2020] FCA 1796 File number(s): NSD 69 of 2021 Judgment of: HALLEY J Date of judgment: 17 June 2022 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – order for costs on appeal to be fixed – funds paid into Court as security for costs be paid to the respondents Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 122
Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) s 25
Cases cited: Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner (No 4) [2020] FCA 1796
Commercial Banking Corporation of Sydney Limited v Colonial Financiers of Australia Pty Ltd [1972] VR 702
Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance Number of paragraphs: 11 Date of hearing: The orders were determined on the papers. Solicitor for the Appellant: AJH Lawyers Solicitor for the Respondents: SD Commercial Lawyers ORDERS
NSD 69 of 2021 BETWEEN: GARY GARNER
Appellant
AND: CENTRAL INNOVATION PTY LIMITED (ACN 123 240 362)
First Respondent
INTERCAD PTY LTD (ACN 072 666 016)
Second Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
HALLEY J
DATE OF ORDER:
17 JUNE 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The costs of the respondents of the appeal be fixed in the sum of $117,000.00.
2.The appellant’s funds in the aggregate sum of $100,000.00 which are currently held by the Federal Court of Australia and which were paid into the Federal Court of Australia to provide for the first respondent’s and second respondent’s security for costs of this proceeding, be paid to the first respondent and the second respondent by depositing them into their solicitor’s trust account, details of which are as follows:
Bank: Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd
Name: SD Commercial Lawyers’ law practice trust account
BSB: 062 018
Account number: 1049 8710
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
HALLEY J:
On 21 April 2022, the Full Court made an order dismissing the appeal with costs from the decision of the primary judge in Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner (No 4) [2020] FCA 1796 and published its reasons: Garner v Central Innovation Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 64.
The appellant had provided security for costs in the sum of $100,000 for the appeal and that sum had been paid into Court pursuant to orders made by Justice Rares on 24 May 2021 requiring the sum to be paid into Court in three tranches between 7 June 2021 and 2 August 2021.
The respondents now seek an order that their costs of the appeal be fixed in sum of $117,000 and that the funds paid into Court by the appellant should be released to them by a payment into their solicitors’ trust account. The respondents rely on an affidavit of Stephen D’Emilio sworn 7 June 2022.
On 18 May 2022, the appellant became…
Continue reading Garner v Central Innovation Pty Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Garner v Central Innovation Pty Limited [2020] FCA 1796
- Case
- [2022] FCA 711
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide on two main issues. First, it needed to ascertain the appropriate amount of costs to be awarded to the respondents for the appeal. Second, it had to determine whether the appellant's funds, which had been paid into court to secure the respondents' costs, should be transferred to the respondents.
The court found that the total costs for the respondents of the appeal should be fixed at $117,000. Given that the appellant had already paid $100,000 into the court as security for these costs, the court ordered that the remaining $17,000 be paid by the appellant to the respondents. Additionally, the court ruled that the $100,000 already paid into court be deposited into the trust account of the respondents' solicitor.
In summary, the court fixed the respondents' costs at $117,000 and ordered that the $100,000 already paid into court be transferred to the respondents' solicitor, leaving the appellant to pay the remaining $17,000.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The costs of the respondents of the appeal be fixed in the sum of $117,000.00.
2. The appellant’s funds in the aggregate sum of $100,000.00 which are currently held by the Federal Court of Australia and which were paid into the Federal Court of Australia to provide for the first respondent’s and second respondent’s security for costs of this proceeding, be paid to the first respondent and the second respondent by depositing them into their solicitor’s trust account, details of which are as follows:
Bank: Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd
Name: SD Commercial Lawyers’ law practice trust account
BSB: 062 018
Account number: 1049 8710
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.