Gallagher v AAG Labour Services Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 16 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Gallagher v AAG Labour Services Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1753

File number: WAD 144 of 2020
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 4 December 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - interlocutory application for further and better particulars of statement of claim - statement of claim alleges that applicant was not paid for certain hours worked - schedule to statement of claim calculated hours said to have been worked - unclear how figures were calculated - applicant ordered to provide further and better particulars     
Legislation:

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 45, 323, 535, 536, 557C, 550

Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) rr 3.33, 3.46

Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 22
Date of hearing: 4 December 2020
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms LJ Mengler
Solicitor for the Applicant: Grondal Bruining
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr PB Dobson
Solicitor for the Respondents: Hotchkin Hanly Lawyers
Counsel for the Cross‑Claimant: Mr PB Dobson
Solicitor for the Cross‑Claimant: Hotchkin Hanly Lawyers
Counsel for the Cross‑Respondent: Mr MJ Keating
Solicitor for the Cross‑Respondent: Williams & Hughes

ORDERS

WAD 144 of 2020
BETWEEN:

BETH GALLAGHER

Applicant

AND:

AAG LABOUR SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 126 217 294)

First Respondent

MARCUS ROMAN ELGIN-STUCZYNSKI

Second Respondent

AND BETWEEN:

AAG LABOUR SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 126 217 294)

Cross-Claimant

AND:

HAYDEN RUSSELL

Cross-Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

JACKSON J

DATE OF ORDER:

4 DECEMBER 2020

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

Claim

1.On or before 1 February 2021, the applicant must:

(a)to the extent that is reasonably practicable for her to do so within that time, provide particulars, insofar as they are within her knowledge, of:

(i)any days on which she did work on the farms known as L2 and/or L3 during the Term;

(ii)any days on which she did not work on the farms known as L2 and/or L3 during the Term;

(iii)the hours she worked on any day specified pursuant to (i) above; and

(b)provide particulars of every fact, matter, circumstance or thing on which she relies in order to calculate the 'Total hours worked' alleged in each row of Schedule B to the statement of claim.

2.The respondents' interlocutory application dated 16 October 2020 is otherwise dismissed.

3.Costs are reserved.

Cross-Claim

4.Pursuant to r 16.51 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the cross-respondent has leave to file a re-amended defence to the cross-claim, in terms of the re-amended defence annexed to the minute of consent submitted by the parties to the cross-claim on 3 December 2020, by no later than 4.00 pm on 4 December 2020.

5.The time for compliance with paragraph 3 of the orders made on 3 November 2020 is extended to 23 December 2020.

6.Costs, if any, are reserved.

Mediation

7.The claim and the cross-claim are referred to mediation before a Registrar of the court pursuant to r 28.02 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), to take place not before March 2021.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Gallagher v AAG Labour Services Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] FCA 1753
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Gallagher brought an action against AAG Labour Services Pty Ltd alleging that she was not paid for certain hours worked. The statement of claim contained a schedule that calculated the hours Gallagher claimed she had worked, but the figures were unclear. The respondents sought further and better particulars of the statement of claim, and the court was required to decide whether the claim was sufficiently particularised. The court found that the claim was not sufficiently particularised and ordered Gallagher to provide further and better particulars within a specified timeframe. The court also referred the claim and cross-claim to mediation and extended the time for compliance with a previous order. The court reserved costs.

The court found that the claim was not sufficiently particularised because the calculation of hours worked was unclear, and the respondents were entitled to further and better particulars to enable them to properly respond to the claim. The court noted that the particulars should be provided to the extent that it is reasonably practicable for Gallagher to do so within the specified timeframe. The court also found that the respondents were entitled to particulars of every fact, matter, circumstance or thing on which Gallagher relies in order to calculate the 'Total hours worked' alleged in each row of Schedule B to the statement of claim. The court ordered Gallagher to provide these particulars within the specified timeframe.

The court found that the respondents were entitled to further and better particulars of the statement of claim, and the claim was not sufficiently particularised. The court ordered Gallagher to provide further and better particulars within a specified timeframe and referred the claim and cross-claim to mediation. The court also extended the time for compliance with a previous order and reserved costs. The court dismissed the respondents' interlocutory application with respect to all other matters.

Orders

Orders of the court

Claim

1. On or before 1 February 2021, the applicant must:

(a) to the extent that is reasonably practicable for her to do so within that time, provide particulars, insofar as they are within her knowledge, of:

(i) any days on which she did work on the farms known as L2 and/or L3 during the Term;

(ii) any days on which she did not work on the farms known as L2 and/or L3 during the Term;

(iii) the hours she worked on any day specified pursuant to (i) above; and

(b) provide particulars of every fact, matter, circumstance or thing on which she relies in order to calculate the 'Total hours worked' alleged in each row of Schedule B to the statement of claim.

2. The respondents' interlocutory application dated 16 October 2020 is otherwise dismissed.

3. Costs are reserved.

Cross-Claim

4. Pursuant to r 16.51 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the cross-respondent has leave to file a re-amended defence to the cross-claim, in terms of the re-amended defence annexed to the minute of consent submitted by the parties to the cross-claim on 3 December 2020, by no later than 4.00 pm on 4 December 2020.

5. The time for compliance with paragraph 3 of the orders made on 3 November 2020 is extended to 23 December 2020.

6. Costs, if any, are reserved.

Mediation

7. The claim and the cross-claim are referred to mediation before a Registrar of the court pursuant to r 28.02 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), to take place not before March 2021.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.