G.T.K. Trading Pty Ltd v Export Development Grants Board

[1982] FCA 68

E v z t , De:lne 2nd E l l i c o t t JJ.

-.

S l n c e	t h e n	t h e	P c W l l n i s t r a t l v e	Appeals	Tr lbuna l	2	F
-

h a s ,

o n

t h e

b a s l s

o f

t h e

P n r v r r s

Fe

E w e ,

s e t

: > s i d e

t h e

..

--

-

c

-

d e c i s i o n of t h e r e s p o n d e n t ~ ; h ~ c h \:as j n q u e z t l o n I n t h e

S
..

r e f e r e n c e .	, .-	-..
..
..- . ^
- -
W
.I
-

The z p p l i c a n t h 2 s no:. :sought pn o rde r f rom

u s t h s t t h e r e sponden t p	~	the	y	apD1icFn t ' s	c o s t s	of	t h e	i-
."i
p r o c e e d i n p s	i n	t h i s	C o u r t .	T h e	responr 'en t	opposes	t h e	L
c
t
h

m&ing	o f	t h a t	o r d e r .	By r r r m p n e n t 1:lI.h	t h e	C o u r t ,	W
1;
*-

each	p a r t y	h?s f l l - ed	I	r l t t e n s u b m i s s i o n s s u p p o r t i n g t h e	c
F-

there 1s no r e z s o n I+y t h e Kenerr1 rule z s xo C O C ~ S

should n o t p r e w i l a d t k a t , t h e ~ p p l l c z n t h E v i n g

advice and i t s D o z i t i o n b e f o r e t h e T r l b u n F I and t h i s

C m r t ~ 3 s more n e u t r a l t h a n a d v e r s a r y . It mpre!y a r p s d

a po ~ n t	o f l n t e r p r e t n t j o n t o a s s i s t t h e T r i b u n a l	;.nd	the
Cour t	t o come	to E c o r r e c t	d e c i s i o n .

q u e s t i o n s o f	l a w	by t he Taxa t ion BoPrds o f	Rcv?rv' e	.	~	,	.
--	S u t t o n v.	Comniesioner	of	Tarr l t ion	(1959)	100	C . L . R .

L

- - _