Administrative Decisions Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: FX v NSW Trustee and Guardian and anor [2012] NSWADT 184 Hearing dates: 30 March 2012, 31 July 2012 and 14 August 2012 Decision date: 05 September 2012 Jurisdiction: General Division Before: P H Molony, Judicial Member Decision: The decisions under review are affirmed.
Catchwords: Guardianship -access to protected person
NSW Trustee and Guardian - sale of homeLegislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Guardianship Act 1987
NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009Cases Cited: Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409
FW and FX v Protective Commissioner [2009] NSWADT 36
FX v NSW Trustee and Guardian (GD) [2009] NSWADTAP 61
FX v NSW Trustee and Guardian (External) [2011] NSWADTAP 5
FX v NSW Trustee and Guardian (External) [2011] NSWADTAP 31
K v K [2000] NSWSC 1052Category: Principal judgment Parties: FX (Applicant)
NSW Trustee and Guardian (Respondent in 123022)
The Public Guardian (Respondent in 123121)Representation: FX (Applicant, in person)
D French (Respondent)
File Number(s): 123022 and 123121 Publication restriction: Section 126 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
FW is an 83 old woman who has been a high care, permanent resident of a nursing home in a country NSW since February 2011. She is reported to have moderate to severe dementia, to be doubly incontinent, and to be reliant on others for her care. She suffers from heart disease, stress and anxiety. She is recovering from colorectal cancer. According to her son, FX, FW was first diagnosed with dementia in 1994.
FX cared for FW for some years prior to her admissions to care in August 2010. FW also has a daughter, OS. FX and his sister are estranged. According to FX, FW is also estranged from her daughter. There has been Supreme Court litigation involving all three of them concerning the estate of FW's late husband and the provisions made for her.
On 1 August 2001 the Guardianship Tribunal made an interim financial management order for FW, and committed the management of her estate to the Protective Commissioner (now the NSW Trustee and Guardian). A final financial management order appointing the Protective Commissioner was made on 17 April 2002.
Since 2010 there have been a series of proceedings in the Guardianship Tribunal, this Tribunal, and the Court of Appeal concerning FW's welfare and estate.
On 21 May 2010 the Guardianship Tribunal dismissed FX's application to review the financial management order relating to his mother, and confirmed to appointment of the NSW Trustee and Guardian as her financial manager.
On 16 November 2012 the Guardianship Tribunal made a temporary guardianship order appointing the Public Guardian as FW's guardian for one month with the functions of accommodation (including coercive powers), health care, medical and dental consents and services. OS made that application. The temporary order was made following FX removing his mother from a respite facility, in circumstances where he had previously said he had no intention of doing so, without…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read FX v NSW Trustee and Guardian and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2012] NSWADT 184
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court needed to address were whether the NSW Trustee and Guardian had acted within their statutory powers and whether they had appropriately balanced the interests of FX with the necessity of managing her estate. The court had to determine if the decisions made were lawful, reasonable, and in the best interests of the protected person. This involved examining the statutory framework governing guardianship and the specific provisions regarding the sale of property belonging to a protected person.
The court found that the NSW Trustee and Guardian had acted within their statutory powers and had appropriately balanced the interests of FX with the practicalities of estate management. The Trustee and Guardian had conducted a thorough review of the property, considered multiple offers, and made a decision that was deemed to be in the best interest of FX. The court emphasised the importance of the statutory duty to act in the best interests of the protected person, and found that the decisions under review were both lawful and reasonable. Consequently, the court affirmed the decisions made by the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decisions under review are affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.