Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2003] AATA 1252
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No Q2001/242
VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION )
Re FRANK FUNNELL Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Dr E K Christie, Member Date12 December 2003
PlaceBrisbane
Decision The decision under review is set aside and in substitution therefor, the Tribunal decides that Mr Funnell is entitled to pension payable at the Special Rate with effect from 22 April 2002.
(Sgd) EK Christie
Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS’ AFFAIRS – benefits and entitlements - disability pension – rate of pension payable - whether applicant entitled to special rate – capacity to undertake remunerative work – applicant not prevented from continuing remunerative work by reason of war-caused incapacity alone – ameliorating provisions - accepted service-related conditions are the ‘substantial cause’ of inability to engage in remunerative work – applicant genuinely seeking to engage in remunerative work – decision set aside
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, s 24 and s 120
Forbes v Repatriation Commission (2000) 101 FCR 50
Flentjar v Repatriation Commission (1997) 48 ALD 1
Re Starcevich and Repatriation Commission (1986) 10 ALN 202
Re Doyle and Repatriation Commission (1986) 47 ALD 187
Jackman v Repatriation Commission [1997] FCA 564
Re Hornery and Repatriation Commission [1998] AATA 602
Cavell v Repatriation Commission (1988) 9 AAR 534
Fox v Repatriation Commission (1997) 45 ALD 317
Byrne v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 1134
Hendy v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 602
Hall v Repatriation Commission (1994) 33 ALD 454
Starcevich v Repatriation Commission (1987) 18 FCR 221
Repatriation Commission v Braund (1991) 23 ALD 591REASONS FOR DECISION
12 December 2003 Dr E K Christie, Member 1. This is an application by Frank Funnell for a review of a decision by the Veterans’ Review Board (the “VRB”) made on 23 January 2001 that Mr Funnell’s “pension be assessed fifty percent (50%) of the General Rate [payable under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986]”.
2. At the hearing, Mr D O’Gorman of Counsel represented Mr Funnell. The respondent was represented by Mr M Smith, a Departmental Advocate.
3. The Tribunal had before it documents lodged pursuant to section 37 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (the “T” documents) and the various documents tendered by the parties.
4. Oral evidence was given by the applicant and Patricia Funnell, the wife of the applicant. The respondent called no witnesses.
Facts
5.Mr Funnell was born on 8 October 1936.
6. Mr Funnell served in the Australian Army with the following periods of operational and eligible service:
(a)Malaya from 17 February 1956 to 2 March 1957;
(b)Brunei/Sabah/Sarawak from 3 September 1964 to 18 January 1965;
(c)Brunei/Sabah/Sarawak from 28 January 1965 to 2 June 1965;
(d)Brunei/Sabah/Sarawak from 7 June 1965 to 19 July 1965;
(e)Vietnam from 19 February 1968 to 4 March 1969; and
(f)rendering eligible defence service from 7 December 1972 to 26 September 1975.
7.Mr Funnell has the following conditions accepted as service related:
(a)Diabetes mellitus (date of decision 7 May 1997);
Continue reading Funnell and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Funnell and Repatriation Commission [2003] AATA 1252
- Case
- [2003] AATA 1252
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues revolved around the interpretation of the statutory provisions that determine eligibility for the special rate of disability pension. Specifically, the court had to decide whether the applicant was genuinely prevented from engaging in remunerative work solely due to his war-caused incapacity and whether his service-related conditions were the substantial cause of his inability to work. This interpretation required consideration of previous case law and the legislative framework governing veterans' entitlements.
The court held that the applicant was indeed entitled to the special rate of pension. It was determined that the applicant's war-caused incapacity, coupled with his acceptance of service-related conditions, sufficiently demonstrated that he was genuinely unable to engage in remunerative work. The court further found that the applicant was actively seeking employment and that his conditions were the substantial cause of his inability to work. Consequently, the decision under review was set aside, and in its place, the Tribunal decided that the applicant was entitled to the special rate of pension with retrospective effect from 22 April 2002.
The final orders of the court mandated that the previous decision be set aside and replaced with a ruling that the applicant, Mr Funnell, was entitled to receive a disability pension at the special rate, effective from 22 April 2002. This ruling ensures that Mr Funnell receives the appropriate pension benefits reflecting his war-caused incapacity and his ongoing efforts to engage in remunerative work.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision under review is set aside and in substitution therefor, the Tribunal decides that Mr Funnell is entitled to pension payable at the Special Rate with effect from 22 April 2002.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.