FRISWELL & CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR (No.2)

Link copied
Case Copied 5 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

FRISWELL & CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR (No.2) [2016] FCCA 1545

Catchwords:
CHILD SUPPORT – Application to terminate Agreement.

COSTS – Application for costs – where substantive Application was summarily dismissed – where no submission made as to why Applicant should not pay the costs of the Child Support Registrar.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s.117

Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), Sch.1, pt.2, div.1

Cases cited:

Friswell & Child Support Registrar [2016] FCCA 869

Applicant: MS FRISWELL
Respondent: CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
File Number: WOC 521 of 2007
Judgment of: Judge Scarlett
Hearing date: 19 April 2016
Date of Last Submission: 19 April 2016
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 28 June 2016

REPRESENTATION

Applicant: No Appearance
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms Taah
Solicitors for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor

ORDERS

  1. The Applicant is to pay the costs of the Respondent Child Support Registrar fixed in the sum of $5,251.50.

  2. The Applicant is allowed three (3) months to pay.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Friswell & Child Support Registrar (No.2) is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT SYDNEY

WOC 521 of 2007

MS FRISWELL

Applicant

And

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Application for Costs

  1. This is an Application for costs by the Child Support Registrar, arising from the summary dismissal of the Applicant’s Application on 19th April 2016 (Friswell & Child Support Registrar[1]). Order (2) made on that date was:

    (2)Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of these Orders, the Applicant may file and serve a written submission showing cause why an Order should not be made requiring her to pay the Respondent’s costs of these proceedings in accordance with Schedule 1 to the Rules.

  2. No written submission has been filed or served. The Applicant has not given any information to the Court as to why an order for costs should not be made.

Costs in Child Support Proceedings

  1. Costs in proceedings under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) and the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth) are dealt with in the same was as family law proceedings, which means that the Court considers the matters set out in s.117 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

  2. If the Court makes an Order for costs, those costs will be calculated on the basis of the scale of costs set out in Division 1 of Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.

Consideration

  1. The Child Support Registrar, in a written submission dated 17th February 2014 and filed in Court on 18th March 2014, submitted that the substantive Application should be dismissed and costs should be payable in accordance with Schedule 1 to the Rules.

  2. In the decision of 19th April 2016 dismissing the Application, I considered the operation of s.117 of the Family Law Act 1975, and specifically considered…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read FRISWELL & CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR (No.2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] FCCA 1545
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *FRISWELL & CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR (No.2)*, Judge Scarlett of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered an application by the Applicant to terminate an agreement. The Respondent was the Child Support Registrar.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Applicant had established grounds for the termination of the agreement. A secondary issue concerned the costs of the proceedings, particularly in light of the substantive application being summarily dismissed.

Judge Scarlett dismissed the Applicant's application to terminate the agreement. The Court found no basis upon which to grant the relief sought by the Applicant. Consequently, the Court ordered that the Applicant pay the costs of the Respondent Child Support Registrar.

The Applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the Respondent Child Support Registrar in the fixed sum of $5,251.50, with three months allowed for payment.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Applicant is to pay the costs of the Respondent Child Support Registrar fixed in the sum of $5,251.50.

2.

The Applicant is allowed three (3) months to pay.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.