Forrest v Abbott Builders (Qld) Pty Ltd [No. 2]

Link copied
Case Copied 47 min read

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

Forrest & Anor v Abbott Builders (Qld) Pty Ltd [No. 2]  [2022] QCAT 164

PARTIES:

PHILLIP FORREST

(applicant)

JAN FORREST 

(applicants)

v

ABBOTT BUILDERS (QLD) PTY LTD 

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

BDL280-19

MATTER TYPE:

Building matters

DELIVERED ON:

4 May 2022

HEARING DATES:

14 December 2021
15 December 2021

16 December 2021

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

A/Member Sammon

ORDERS:

1.     The respondent Abbott Builders (Qld) Pty Ltd must pay the applicants the amount of $42,425.50 in respect of their application.

2.     Costs are awarded to the applicants in the amount $6,535.80.of

CATCHWORDS:

CONTRACTS – BUILDING, ENGINEERING AND RELATED CONTRACTS – contract for construction of a house – claim for liquidated damages for delay in completion – claim by owner against builder for items not constructed in accordance with contract

Building Act 1975 (Qld), s 99

Building Regulation 2006 (Qld), s 31, s 32, s 46
Building Regulation 2021 (Qld), s 73
Queensland Building and Construction Act 1991 (Qld), s 67AZN, s 77, schedule 1B
Queensland Building and Construction Regulation 2018 (Qld), s 54
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 100, s 102, s 107

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2019 (Qld), s 8(2)(c)

Lyons v Dreamstarter Pty Ltd [2012] QCATA 071

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

Applicants:

Self represented

Respondent: 

Mr Wayne Abbott (Director) and Mr R Paterson (employee of respondent)

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

  1. The applicants (the Forrests) have filed an application in the Tribunal against the respondent (Abbott) for damages payable under a contract[1] between the parties in which Abbott contracted to build a home for the Forrests.

    [1]Terms defined in the contract (by clause 38 of the General Conditions) are identified in the contract by italicised text. When I refer to a term defined in the contract for the first time, I will do so in italicised text.

  2. In summary, the claim by the Forrests consists of a claim for liquidated damages for delay in completion of the contract, and secondly for alleged failures by Abbott to carry out work as required by the contract.

  3. The contract, dated 5 December 2016 is in evidence before the Tribunal, in exhibit 18, (first statement of Phillip Forrest, dated 26 July 2020, attachment PF1). It is a Housing Industry Association, Queensland Plain Language New Home Construction Contract.[2]

    [2]QC1 (2015).

Summary of issues in the Forrests’ claim

  1. A summary of the claims made by the Forrests, taken from their written submissions, filed on 6 January 2022, adopting the item numbers and alphabetic identifiers used by the Forests is as follows:

    (a)Item A - late completion damages;

    (b)Item 1 - certification fees;

    (c)Item 2 - RW2 (retaining wall 2);

    (d)Item 3 - clerestory window;

    (e)Items 4, 7, 10, 15 and 17;

    (f)Items 5, 6, 14 and 20;

    (g)Item 8 - ensuite shower wall;

    (h)Item 9 - lower-level fridge stud wall;

    (i)Item 11 - void cladding not painted;

    (j)Item 12 - termite protection;

    (k)Item 13 - wardrobe in bedroom 4;

    (l)Item 19…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Forrest v Abbott Builders (Qld) Pty Ltd [No. 2] and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] QCAT 164
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Forrests brought a claim in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal against Abbott Builders (Qld) Pty Ltd, alleging that Abbott had failed to construct their home in accordance with the contract between the parties. The Forrests' claim included a claim for liquidated damages for delay in completion of the contract and a claim for failure to construct certain items as specified in the contract. The Tribunal held that the Forrests were entitled to liquidated damages for delay in completion of the contract in the amount of $12,000, together with interest of $4,185.21. The Tribunal also allowed claims for failure to provide certification, failure to construct a retaining wall to the required length, failure to install a motorised clerestory window, failure to supply and install an external tap, failure to supply and install exhaust fans, and failure to supply and install security bolts. The Tribunal also allowed the Forrests’ claim for costs in the amount of $6,535.80. The formal orders will be that Abbott must pay the Forrests the amount of $42,425.50 for their claim, and $6,535.80 for costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.