QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
Forrest & Anor v Abbott Builders (Qld) Pty Ltd [No. 2] [2022] QCAT 164
PARTIES:
PHILLIP FORREST (applicant)
JAN FORREST (applicants)
v
ABBOTT BUILDERS (QLD) PTY LTD (respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S:
BDL280-19
MATTER TYPE:
Building matters
DELIVERED ON:
4 May 2022
HEARING DATES:
14 December 2021
15 December 202116 December 2021
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
A/Member Sammon
ORDERS:
1. The respondent Abbott Builders (Qld) Pty Ltd must pay the applicants the amount of $42,425.50 in respect of their application.
2. Costs are awarded to the applicants in the amount $6,535.80.of
CATCHWORDS:
CONTRACTS – BUILDING, ENGINEERING AND RELATED CONTRACTS – contract for construction of a house – claim for liquidated damages for delay in completion – claim by owner against builder for items not constructed in accordance with contract
Building Act 1975 (Qld), s 99
Building Regulation 2006 (Qld), s 31, s 32, s 46
Building Regulation 2021 (Qld), s 73
Queensland Building and Construction Act 1991 (Qld), s 67AZN, s 77, schedule 1B
Queensland Building and Construction Regulation 2018 (Qld), s 54
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 100, s 102, s 107Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2019 (Qld), s 8(2)(c)
APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
Applicants:
Self represented
Respondent:
Mr Wayne Abbott (Director) and Mr R Paterson (employee of respondent)
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
The applicants (the Forrests) have filed an application in the Tribunal against the respondent (Abbott) for damages payable under a contract[1] between the parties in which Abbott contracted to build a home for the Forrests.
[1]Terms defined in the contract (by clause 38 of the General Conditions) are identified in the contract by italicised text. When I refer to a term defined in the contract for the first time, I will do so in italicised text.
In summary, the claim by the Forrests consists of a claim for liquidated damages for delay in completion of the contract, and secondly for alleged failures by Abbott to carry out work as required by the contract.
The contract, dated 5 December 2016 is in evidence before the Tribunal, in exhibit 18, (first statement of Phillip Forrest, dated 26 July 2020, attachment PF1). It is a Housing Industry Association, Queensland Plain Language New Home Construction Contract.[2]
[2]QC1 (2015).
Summary of issues in the Forrests’ claim
A summary of the claims made by the Forrests, taken from their written submissions, filed on 6 January 2022, adopting the item numbers and alphabetic identifiers used by the Forests is as follows:
(a)Item A - late completion damages;
(b)Item 1 - certification fees;
(c)Item 2 - RW2 (retaining wall 2);
(d)Item 3 - clerestory window;
(e)Items 4, 7, 10, 15 and 17;
(f)Items 5, 6, 14 and 20;
(g)Item 8 - ensuite shower wall;
(h)Item 9 - lower-level fridge stud wall;
(i)Item 11 - void cladding not painted;
(j)Item 12 - termite protection;
(k)Item 13 - wardrobe in bedroom 4;
(l)Item 19…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Forrest v Abbott Builders (Qld) Pty Ltd [No. 2] and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] QCAT 164
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.