Fitzgerald v Struber

Case [2016] QLC 48


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Fitzgerald v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 48
PARTIES: Cheryl May Fitzgerald
(applicant)

v

Stephen Roy Struber & Dianne Rose Wilson-Struber

(respondents)

FILE NO: MRA080-16
DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for grant of a mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 17 August 2016
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD ON: Submissions closed 4 May 2016
HEARD AT: Heard on the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: GJ Smith
ORDERS:

1.    In respect of ML 100034 compensation is determined in the total sum of $550 for the initial grant period of 10 years.

2.    The miner pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amount set out in order 1 within three months from notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

CATCHWORDS:

MINING LEASE – grant – referral – determination of   compensation – absence of expert or valuation evidence – use of Court judgments for determination purposes.

Mineral Resources Act 1989 s 281(1)

Public Trustee Act 1978

Eacham Abrasive Blasting Pty Ltd v Gundersen & Anor [2014] QLC 38
Re Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76

Unimin Australia Limited v Freeman [2007] QLC 76
Wallace & Ors v Bottomer & Ors [2015] QLC 23
Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297

APPEARANCES: Not applicable
  1. This proceeding concerns a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 281(1) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the grant of Mining Lease 100034. The referral documents list the address for the respondents as:

    ANDREW RUSHTON
              PRINCIPAL PUBLIC TRUST OFFICER
              PUBLIC TRUST OFFICE
              PO BOX 656

    CAIRNS QLD 4870

Background

  1. The applicant, Cheryl May Fitzgerald (the miner) seeks the grant of a mining lease located on land described as Lot 14 on SP 250040.  The Mining Lease Area comprises of 4.6 ha within Palmerville Station which is owned by the respondents Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber (the landowners). 

  2. The property is located in the Cook Shire Local Government area and is used for grazing purposes. 

  3. The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows: 

Court Reference Tenure ID Area Term Lease Purpose
MRA080-16 ML 100034 4.6 ha 10 years Gold – Tin
  1. On 15 December 2015 a Certificate of Application for Mining Lease 100034 was issued by the Mining Registrar at Mareeba.

Relevant Legislation

  1. Section 279 of the MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court.  In this matter, no agreement has been lodged with DNRM and the matter has been referred to the Land Court for determination.

  1. Section 281 of the MRA identifies the matters which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation.…

Continue reading Fitzgerald v Struber

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Fitzgerald v Struber [2016] QLC 48
Case
[2016] QLC 48
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Fitzgerald v Struber, the primary focus was on the determination of compensation for the grant of a mining lease, specifically ML 100034, from the Minister for Natural Resources. The dispute involved the landowners who contested the adequacy of the compensation offered by the miner, Struber. The case was adjudicated in the Queensland Land Court, presided over by Judge Brown.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the compensation offered for the initial grant period of 10 years was fair and reasonable. The absence of expert or valuation evidence presented a challenge in determining the compensation amount. The court was required to rely on previous court judgments to ascertain a just and equitable compensation figure.

Judge Brown examined the relevant provisions of the Mining Act and assessed the compensation offered in light of the precedents set by previous court decisions. Considering the lack of expert evidence, the court found that the compensation offered was insufficient. The court determined that the compensation should be set at $550 for the initial 10-year period. The judgment mandated that the miner pay the determined compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners within three months of the mining lease's issuance notification by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 100034 compensation is determined in the total sum of $550 for the initial grant period of 10 years.

2. The miner pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amount set out in order 1 within three months from notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.