FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Findex Australia Pty Limited v McKay [2019] FCA 335
File number: VID 1026 of 2016 Judge: STEWART J Date of judgment: 11 March 2019 Date of publication of reasons:
14 March 2019 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – Order sought for leave under
s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to proceed with a claim against company in voluntary liquidation – Whether leave should be granted to bring claim.Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 500(2) Cases cited: Eopply New Energy Technology Co Ltd v EP Solar Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 356
Re DSHE Holdings Limited (recs and mgrs appointed) (in liq) [2018] NSWSC 82
Date of hearing: 11 March 2019 Registry: Australian Capital Territory Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 16 Counsel for the Applicants: I Neil SC with N Furlan Solicitor for the Applicants: Harmers Workplace Lawyers Counsel for the Respondents: M A Karam with T C Arnold Solicitor for the Respondents: Just Dispute Resolution ORDERS
VID 1026 of 2016 BETWEEN: FINDEX AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 128 588 714)
First Applicant
CIVIC FINANCIAL PLANNING LIMITED (ACN 143 253 767)
Second Applicant
FINDEX SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 128 588 705)
Third Applicant
FINANCIAL INDEX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 094 287 037)
Fourth ApplicantAND: DAVID KEITH MCKAY
First Respondent
VANDAMAN PTY LTD (ACN 103 917 773)
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
STEWART J
DATE OF ORDER:
11 MARCH 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), that on the condition that the applicants not seek to enforce any judgment which they may obtain against Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773) without leave of the Court, the applicants be granted leave to proceed with this proceeding against Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773).
2.The leave ordered in order 1 operate and be effective from 19 February 2019.
3.The applicants’ costs of and incidental to this application be costs in the proceeding as between the applicants and Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773).
4.Time for service of the application be abridged until 11 March 2019.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)STEWART J:
The applicants assert claims against the two respondents arising from alleged breaches of restraints of trade and misuse of confidential information by the first respondent, a natural person. The first respondent is the former principal and sole director of the second respondent, a corporation.
The claims against the second respondent are asserted on the basis that, in collusion with the first respondent, and by the conduct of the first respondent, it breached the relevant restraint. In the alternative, it is asserted that the second respondent is by the first respondent’s alleged conduct in breach of a contractual undertaking that the first respondent will not breach the restraint.
Following customary pre-trial processes including subpoenas for documents,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Findex Australia Pty Limited v McKay and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] FCA 335
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the provisions of section 500(2) of the Corporations Act, which allows for leave to be granted in cases involving companies in liquidation. The court emphasised the need to balance the interests of the applicants, the liquidator, and other creditors in the liquidation process. The applicants needed to demonstrate that their claim was legitimate and that there were exceptional circumstances warranting the granting of leave. The court also took into account the potential impact of enforcing a judgment against the company on the distribution of assets among creditors.
After reviewing the evidence and submissions, the court concluded that the applicants had demonstrated a sufficient basis for their claim and that there were exceptional circumstances justifying the granting of leave. The court found that the applicants' claim was not precluded by the company's liquidation and that the interests of justice warranted allowing the proceeding to continue. Consequently, the court granted the applicants leave to proceed with the claim, subject to the condition that they not enforce any judgment without further leave of the court.
The court also ordered that the leave granted would be effective from a specified date and that the applicants' costs associated with the application would be costs in the proceeding. Additionally, the court abridged the time for service of the application, allowing the applicants to expedite the proceedings. These orders ensured that the applicants could pursue their claim while considering the broader implications of the company's liquidation.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), that on the condition that the applicants not seek to enforce any judgment which they may obtain against Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773) without leave of the Court, the applicants be granted leave to proceed with this proceeding against Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773).
2. The leave ordered in order 1 operate and be effective from 19 February 2019.
3. The applicants’ costs of and incidental to this application be costs in the proceeding as between the applicants and Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773).
4. Time for service of the application be abridged until 11 March 2019.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.