Findex Australia Pty Limited v McKay

Link copied
Case Copied 8 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Findex Australia Pty Limited v McKay [2019] FCA 335

File number: VID 1026 of 2016
Judge: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 11 March 2019

Date of publication of reasons:

14 March 2019
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – Order sought for leave under
s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to proceed with a claim against company in voluntary liquidation – Whether leave should be granted to bring claim.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 500(2)
Cases cited:

Eopply New Energy Technology Co Ltd v EP Solar Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 356

Re DSHE Holdings Limited (recs and mgrs appointed) (in liq) [2018] NSWSC 82

Date of hearing: 11 March 2019
Registry: Australian Capital Territory
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicants: I Neil SC with N Furlan
Solicitor for the Applicants: Harmers Workplace Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: M A Karam with T C Arnold
Solicitor for the Respondents: Just Dispute Resolution

ORDERS

VID 1026 of 2016
BETWEEN:

FINDEX AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 128 588 714)

First Applicant

CIVIC FINANCIAL PLANNING LIMITED (ACN 143 253 767)

Second Applicant

FINDEX SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 128 588 705)

Third Applicant

FINANCIAL INDEX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 094 287 037)
Fourth Applicant

AND:

DAVID KEITH MCKAY

First Respondent

VANDAMAN PTY LTD (ACN 103 917 773)

Second Respondent

JUDGE:

STEWART J

DATE OF ORDER:

11 MARCH 2019

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Pursuant to s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), that on the condition that the applicants not seek to enforce any judgment which they may obtain against Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773) without leave of the Court, the applicants be granted leave to proceed with this proceeding against Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773).

2.The leave ordered in order 1 operate and be effective from 19 February 2019.

3.The applicants’ costs of and incidental to this application be costs in the proceeding as between the applicants and Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773).

4.Time for service of the application be abridged until 11 March 2019.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)

STEWART J:

  1. The applicants assert claims against the two respondents arising from alleged breaches of restraints of trade and misuse of confidential information by the first respondent, a natural person.  The first respondent is the former principal and sole director of the second respondent, a corporation.

  2. The claims against the second respondent are asserted on the basis that, in collusion with the first respondent, and by the conduct of the first respondent, it breached the relevant restraint.  In the alternative, it is asserted that the second respondent is by the first respondent’s alleged conduct in breach of a contractual undertaking that the first respondent will not breach the restraint.

  3. Following customary pre-trial processes including subpoenas for documents,…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Findex Australia Pty Limited v McKay and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] FCA 335
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Findex Australia Pty Limited sought leave to proceed with a claim against Vandaman Pty Ltd, a company in voluntary liquidation, under section 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The Federal Court was tasked with determining whether leave should be granted to the applicants to bring the claim against the liquidated company. The primary issue before the court was whether the applicants had a sufficient basis to seek leave to enforce any potential judgment against the company, which was in the process of liquidation. The applicants argued that the leave was necessary to address a specific dispute that arose prior to the liquidation.

The court considered the provisions of section 500(2) of the Corporations Act, which allows for leave to be granted in cases involving companies in liquidation. The court emphasised the need to balance the interests of the applicants, the liquidator, and other creditors in the liquidation process. The applicants needed to demonstrate that their claim was legitimate and that there were exceptional circumstances warranting the granting of leave. The court also took into account the potential impact of enforcing a judgment against the company on the distribution of assets among creditors.

After reviewing the evidence and submissions, the court concluded that the applicants had demonstrated a sufficient basis for their claim and that there were exceptional circumstances justifying the granting of leave. The court found that the applicants' claim was not precluded by the company's liquidation and that the interests of justice warranted allowing the proceeding to continue. Consequently, the court granted the applicants leave to proceed with the claim, subject to the condition that they not enforce any judgment without further leave of the court.

The court also ordered that the leave granted would be effective from a specified date and that the applicants' costs associated with the application would be costs in the proceeding. Additionally, the court abridged the time for service of the application, allowing the applicants to expedite the proceedings. These orders ensured that the applicants could pursue their claim while considering the broader implications of the company's liquidation.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), that on the condition that the applicants not seek to enforce any judgment which they may obtain against Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773) without leave of the Court, the applicants be granted leave to proceed with this proceeding against Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773).

2. The leave ordered in order 1 operate and be effective from 19 February 2019.

3. The applicants’ costs of and incidental to this application be costs in the proceeding as between the applicants and Vandaman Pty Ltd (ACN 103 917 773).

4. Time for service of the application be abridged until 11 March 2019.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.