District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fields v Berrigan & Anor (No. 1) [2022] NSWDC 567 Hearing dates: 15-16 September 2022 Date of orders: 16 September 2022 Decision date: 16 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Matter number 2022/00180644 is dismissed.
Catchwords: WORK INJURY DAMAGES – PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – NOTICE OF MOTION – Application to dismiss proceedings – Failure to comply with procedural requirements for Work Injury Damages claim – Attempt to remedy procedural deficiencies.
Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)Workers Compensation Act 1926 (NSW)
Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW)
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Attileah v State Rail Authority [2005] 62 NSWLR 439
Dickinsonv Chapman [2022] NSWCA 2
Goode v Angland [2016] NSWSC 1016
Texts Cited: Nil.
Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Plaintiff - Todd Matthew Fields
First Defendant – Paul Berrigan
Second Defendant – Tamworth Jockey ClubRepresentation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Plaintiff – Mr Best, M.
First Defendant – Mr Morris, P. SC
Second Defendant – Mr Stanton, D.
Plaintiff – Everingham Solomons
First Defendant – McCabe Curwood
Second Defendant – Bartier Perry Lawyers
File Number(s): 2016/85305; 2022/180644 Publication restriction: Nil.
Judgment
Background
-
HIS HONOUR: Currently before me are two sets of proceedings and a number of motions on notice. One set of proceedings is matter number 2016/85305. The other set of proceedings is matter 2022/180644. The proceedings before me can be politely described as a dog’s breakfast. They all arise out of an accident which befell Todd Matthew Fields, the Plaintiff, on 20 March 2013, some nine and a half years ago.
Plaintiff makes a workers compensation claim
-
In a claim for workers compensation, the Plaintiff described himself as a trackwork rider. The brief description of injury in the same document is this:
“Horse bucked & trampled me.”
On 26 March 2013, Mr Paul Berrigan, the First Defendant, completed an “Employer’s Injury Claim Form” using stationery provided to him by Racing NSW. Under the heading “Employer details”, the First Defendant inserted his own name. Under the heading “Employee details” he inserted the name “Todd Fields”. He confirmed that Mr Fields was a “Track work rider”. Under the heading “Current Duties,” Mr Berrigan said this:
“Just started
Riding 4 days.”
-
In answer to a question as to whether he was aware if the worker had other employment, Mr Berrigan ticked a box saying “Yes”, and went on to state that the Plaintiff had been riding for other trainers. He confirmed that the accident occurred when a horse bucked and that the incident occurred at a racecourse. It is common ground that the racecourse was, in fact, the Tamworth Racecourse, which is controlled, managed, and perhaps even owned, by the Tamworth Jockey Club. In his report of injury, Mr Berrigan said that the incident was reported on the day that it occurred, and that he was aware that the…
Continue reading Fields v Berrigan (No. 1)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Fields v Berrigan (No. 1) [2022] NSWDC 567
- Case
- [2022] NSWDC 567
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the procedural deficiencies were so significant that they rendered the claim invalid. It was necessary to assess whether the deficiencies could be cured through an amendment or if the failure to comply with the procedural requirements was fatal to the claim. The court noted that while the plaintiff had attempted to remedy the deficiencies, the amendments did not fully address the required procedural steps. Given that the statutory requirements for work injury claims are strict, the court found that the deficiencies could not be rectified.
Consequently, the court dismissed the proceedings due to the failure to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements. The dismissal was based on the court's finding that the deficiencies were not amenable to an amendment that would cure them. As a result, the matter was dismissed without proceeding to a substantive determination on the merits of the claim.
ORDERS:
Matter number 2022/00180644 is dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Matter number 2022/00180644 is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.