SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Case Title: | Ezekiel-Hart v Reis |
Citation: | [2018] ACTSC 264 |
Hearing Dates: | 13 February, 15 May 2018 |
DecisionDate: | 19 September 2018 |
Before: | McWilliam AsJ |
Decision: | See [119] – [120] |
Catchwords: | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment – whether reasonable cause of action disclosed – application seeking a declaration that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigant – where arguable causes of action found and plaintiff demonstrates some insight into legal consequences – applications dismissed |
Legislation Cited: | Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) s 118 |
Cases Cited: | Attorney-General v Chan [2011] NSWSC 1315 Pascoe v Liprini [2011] NSWSC 1484 |
Parties: | Emmanuel Tam Ezekiel-Hart (Plaintiff in SC 433 of 2017, Appellant in SCA 75 of 2017) Robert Anthony Reis (First Defendant in SC 433 of 2017, First Respondent in SCA 75 of 2017) Council of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory (Second Defendant in SC 433 of 2017, Second Respondent in SCA 75 of 2017) Australian Capital Territory (Third Defendant in SC 433 of 2017) |
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Ezekiel-Hart v Reis and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2018] ACTSC 264
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues for the court to resolve were whether the plaintiff's claims met the threshold for a reasonable cause of action and whether the plaintiff's conduct warranted a declaration of vexatious litigiousness. In assessing the plaintiff's application for summary judgment, the court had to consider whether the defendant had a bona fide defence to the plaintiff's claims and whether there were any arguable facts that could be relied upon. In considering the defendant's application for a declaration of vexatious litigiousness, the court had to determine whether the plaintiff had engaged in conduct that demonstrated a pattern of frivolous or oppressive litigation.
The court dismissed both applications. In dismissing the plaintiff's application for summary judgment, the court found that there were arguable facts and causes of action, and that the plaintiff had demonstrated some insight into the legal consequences of the proceedings. The court found that the plaintiff had not acted vexatiously in bringing the application for summary judgment, and that the defendant had not demonstrated that the application should be dismissed on the basis of the plaintiff's history of litigation. In dismissing the defendant's application for a declaration of vexatious litigiousness, the court found that the plaintiff's conduct did not amount to vexatious litigation, as the plaintiff had demonstrated some insight into the legal consequences of the proceedings and had not engaged in a pattern of frivolous or oppressive litigation.
The court dismissed both the plaintiff's application for summary judgment and the defendant's application for a declaration that the plaintiff was a vexatious litigant. The court found that the plaintiff's application for summary judgment disclosed a reasonable cause of action and that the defendant had not demonstrated that the application should be dismissed on the basis of the plaintiff's history of litigation. The court also found that the plaintiff's conduct did not amount to vexatious litigation, as the plaintiff had demonstrated some insight into the legal consequences of the proceedings and had not engaged in a pattern of frivolous or oppressive litigation.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [119] – [120]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.