EXIBIT Exhibitions and Publishing Pty Ltd v Webb

Link copied
Case Copied 23 min read

EXIBIT EXHIBITIONS & PUBLISHING PTY LTD -v- WEBB [2005] WASC 129



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2005] WASC 129
Case No:CIV:1145/20059 JUNE 2005
Coram:MASTER NEWNES17/06/05
17Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Statement of claim struck out
B
PDF Version
Parties:EXIBIT EXHIBITIONS & PUBLISHING PTY LTD (ACN 089 992 110)
JOHN RAYMOND WEBB

Catchwords:

Defamation
Application to strike out statement of claim
Adequacy of plea of knowledge of extrinsic facts going to identification
Whether imputations capable of being conveyed
Whether embarrassing
Turns on own facts

Legislation:

Nil

Case References:

Beran v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 107
Consolidated Trust Co Ltd v Browne (1948) 49 SR(NSW) 86
Drummoyne Municipal Council v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1990) 21 NSWLR 135
Gordon v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd & Anor (1980) 2 NSWLR 410
Gumina v Williams (No 1) (1990) 3 WAR 342
Jones v Skelton [1963] 1 WLR 1362
Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234
Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Harrison (1982) 149 CLR 293
Monte v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR 663
Ron Hodgson (Trading) Pty Ltd v Belvedere Motors (Hurstville) Pty Ltd & Ors (1971) 1 NSWLR 472
Taylor v Jecks (1993) 10 WAR 309
Tsvangirai v The Special Broadcasting Service [2002] NSWSC 532

Askew v Morris [2005] WASCA 59
Boral Besser Masonry Ltd v ACCC (2003) 215 CLR 374
Bristile Ltd v Buddhist Society of Western Australia Inc (2000) Aust Torts Reprots 81­548
Chapman v Australian Broadcasting Commission (2000) 77 SASR 181
Cock v Hughes [2001] WASC 24
Day v William Hill (Park Lane) Ltd ]1949] 1 KB 632
Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575
Hall Chadwick Corp Finance (WA) Ltd v Axion Properties Ltd [2002] WASC 179
Heytesbury Holdings Pty Ltd v City of Subiaco (1998) 19 WAR 440
John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin (2003) 201 ALR 77
Stokes v Cowan [2005] WASC 39
Wookey v Western Australian Newspapers Ltd [2004] WASC 96

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    IN CHAMBERS
CITATION : EXIBIT EXHIBITIONS & PUBLISHING PTY LTD -v- WEBB [2005] WASC 129 CORAM : MASTER NEWNES HEARD : 9 JUNE 2005 DELIVERED : 17 JUNE 2005 FILE NO/S : CIV 1145 of 2005 BETWEEN : EXIBIT EXHIBITIONS & PUBLISHING PTY LTD (ACN 089 992 110)
    Plaintiff

    AND

    JOHN RAYMOND WEBB
    Defendant



Catchwords:

Defamation - Application to strike out statement of claim - Adequacy of plea of knowledge of extrinsic facts going to identification - Whether imputations capable of being conveyed - Whether embarrassing - Turns on own facts




Legislation:

Nil




Result:

Statement of claim struck out



(Page 2)

Category: B

Representation:


Counsel:


    Plaintiff : Mr C Ko
    Defendant : Mr J C Giles


Solicitors:

    Plaintiff : Brickhills
    Defendant : Solomon Brothers



Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Beran v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 107
Consolidated Trust Co Ltd v Browne (1948) 49 SR(NSW) 86
Drummoyne Municipal Council v…
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read EXIBIT Exhibitions and Publishing Pty Ltd v Webb and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2005] WASC 129
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Exhibit Exhibitions and Publishing Pty Ltd brought an action against John Raymond Webb for defamation. Webb applied to strike out the amended statement of claim on the ground that it disclosed no reasonable cause of action or, alternatively, was embarrassing. The plaintiff's amended statement of claim contained allegations of defamatory imputations conveyed by a letter sent by the defendant to creditors of a company of which the defendant was the sole director. The court found that certain paragraphs of the statement of claim should be pleaded as particulars of extrinsic facts relied upon for identification, not material facts. The court also found that some of the pleaded imputations were incapable of being conveyed by the words complained of and others were too general. Accordingly, the court ordered the amended statement of claim be struck out, with leave to the plaintiff to replead.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.