FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ERICSSON & ERICSSON (No.2) | [2015] FCCA 3146 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Parenting – shared parental responsibility – change in circumstances. FAMILY LAW – Parenting – summary dismissal – best interests of children. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss.11F, 60B, 60CA, 60CC Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), r.13.10 |
| Rice & Asplund (1979) FLC 90-725 SPS & PLS [2008] FamCAFC 16 Marsden & Winch [2009] FamCAFC 152 |
| Applicant: | MR ERICSSON |
| Respondent: | MS ERICSSON |
| File Number: | DGC 1317 of 2013 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Phipps |
| Hearing date: | 22 September 2015 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 22 September 2015 |
| Delivered at: | Dandenong |
| Delivered on: | 27 November 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Dr O’Brien |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Elisa Rothschild Lawyer |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Ms Jenkins |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Rockman & Rockman |
ORDERS
The Initiating Application filed 14 August 2015 is dismissed.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Ericsson & Ericsson (No.2) is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT DANDENONG |
DGC 1317 of 2013
| MR ERICSSON |
Applicant
And
| MS ERICSSON |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Background
The applicant father, Mr Ericsson, and the respondent mother, Ms Ericsson, have three children X born (omitted) 2003, Y born (omitted) 2006 and Z born (omitted) 2008. After a contested hearing I made final orders on 18 December 2014. The children’s orders are as follows:
That the wife have sole parental responsibility for the children of the marriage X born (omitted) 2003, Y born (omitted) 2006 and Z born (omitted) 2008 (“the children”), in regard to the children’s education (both current and future) and health save that the mother shall, prior to making the sole ultimate decision about any such issue:
(a)Use her best endeavours to advise the father in writing of the decision intended to be made;
(b)Seek the father’s written response in relation thereto;
(c)Consider, by reference to the best interests of the children, any such response prior to making any such decision;
(d)Advise the father in writing as soon as reasonably practicable of her ultimate decision.
That other than in paragraph (1) the parties have equal shared responsibility for the children.
That the children live with the wife.
That the children spend time and communicate with the husband during the school term as follows:
(a)Each alternate weekend from after school or like time on Friday to 5.00pm Sunday;
(b)Each alternate Thursday from after school or like time to 7.00pm;
(c)As otherwise agreed in writing between the parties.
That the children spend time and communicate with the husband during (religion omitted) festivals as follows:
(a)In each even numbered year for the first 2 days of (omitted), the 2 days of (omitted), the 1 day of (omitted) and the last 2 days of (omitted) which are otherwise known as (omitted) and (omitted); and
(b)In each odd numbered year for the last 2 days of (omitted), the 2 days of (omitted) and the first 2 days…
Continue reading ERICSSON & ERICSSON (No.2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Ericsson and Ericsson (No.2) [2015] FCCA 3146
- Case
- [2015] FCCA 3146
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of the Initiating Application filed by Ericsson & Ericsson (No.2). The court was required to consider the merits of this application and decide whether it should be upheld or dismissed.
Judge Phipps dismissed the Initiating Application. No further reasoning or legal principles applied are provided in the excerpt.
The court ordered that the Initiating Application filed 14 August 2015 is dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Initiating Application filed 14 August 2015 is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.