Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Eveston (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 150 Hearing dates: 15 December 2021 Date of orders: 16 December 2021 Decision date: 16 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Pain J Decision: The Court orders:
(1) Vacate the sentencing hearing listed on 9 and 10 February 2022.
(2) List the matter before the List Judge on 25 February 2022 for directions.
(3) The sentencing hearing is listed for 12-13 October 2022.
Catchwords: PROCEDURE – vacation of sentencing hearing for two offences of failing to comply with conditions in an amended revocation notice granted – new hearing dates to be allocated
Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.36
Cases Cited: Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Turnbull [2019] NSWLEC 125
Environment Protection Authority v Eveston [2020] NSWLEC 178
Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor)
Christopher James Eveston (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
T Epstein (Prosecutor)
J Farrell (Defendant)
Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor)
File Number(s): 2020/145596, 2020/145597 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
The Defendant, Mr Eveston, has been charged with two offences relating to the failure to comply with two conditions of an amended revocation notice dated 12 February 2019 issued in relation to an environment protection licence. The failures relate to the removal of waste from a site at Goulburn in stages in a specified timeframe. Mr Eveston has pleaded guilty to both charges. He has filed a notice of motion dated 14 December 2021 seeking an order vacating the sentencing hearing presently set down for 9-10 February 2022.
-
Mr Eveston is represented by his barrister Mr Farrell who is acting pro bono and has only recently been briefed in November 2021. Mr Eveston was unrepresented from 12 July 2021 until recently.
Evidence
-
Mr Eveston has sworn an affidavit dated 14 December 2021 attesting to the conduct of these proceedings and related Class 1 proceedings to date which chronology is lengthy. A chronology of events is set out in par 3 as follows:
15/5/20 – the EPA issued the 2 criminal actions (these proceedings).
20/5/20 – the EPA served the 2 criminal actions.
19/6/20 – the EPA’s expert witness Mr Marton’s [sic] swears his first affidavit attaching his report (dated 19/6/20) (Martons [sic] report)
25/6/20 – Mr Martons [sic] affidavit & report were served.
14/8/20 – I entered please of guilty to both of the EPA’s criminal charges
28/5/21 – the NSW LEC dismissed both my applications for orders to make the EPA release my $250,000 security (that I paid as a condition of the EPL, which the EPA revoked in March 2018) which meant I didn’t have nay money to pay for the clean-up required at the Goulburn Site.
6/21 – BAL Lawyers stopped acting for me in these proceedings.
6/8/21 – the EPA served 2 certificates of conviction, and affidavit of Mr Heinze and a further affidavit by Mr Martons [sic].
7/9/21 – the EPA…
Continue reading Environment Protection Authority v Eveston (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Environment Protection Authority v Eveston (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 150
- Case
- [2021] NSWLEC 150
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In its judgment, the court found that the Authority had established a case against Eveston regarding the alleged environmental breaches. The court detailed the specific instances where Eveston failed to comply with the relevant environmental laws, including the lack of proper waste disposal and incomplete record-keeping. The court also considered the severity and frequency of these breaches in determining the appropriate penalty. However, the court decided to vacate the previously scheduled sentencing hearing and set a new date for the hearing, while also listing the matter for further directions. The court's decision highlighted the importance of strict compliance with environmental regulations and the potential consequences for non-compliance.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) Vacate the sentencing hearing listed on 9 and 10 February 2022.
(2) List the matter before the List Judge on 25 February 2022 for directions.
(3) The sentencing hearing is listed for 12-13 October 2022.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.