Environment Protection Authority v Eveston (No 2)

Case [2021] NSWLEC 150


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Eveston (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 150
Hearing dates: 15 December 2021
Date of orders: 16 December 2021
Decision date: 16 December 2021
Jurisdiction:Class 5
Before: Pain J
Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) Vacate the sentencing hearing listed on 9 and 10 February 2022.

(2) List the matter before the List Judge on 25 February 2022 for directions.

(3) The sentencing hearing is listed for 12-13 October 2022.

Catchwords:

PROCEDURE – vacation of sentencing hearing for two offences of failing to comply with conditions in an amended revocation notice granted – new hearing dates to be allocated

Legislation Cited:

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.36

Cases Cited:

Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Turnbull [2019] NSWLEC 125

Environment Protection Authority v Eveston [2020] NSWLEC 178

Eveston v Environment Protection Authority [2021] NSWLEC 52

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor)
Christopher James Eveston (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
T Epstein (Prosecutor)
J Farrell (Defendant)

Solicitors:
Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor)
File Number(s): 2020/145596, 2020/145597
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. The Defendant, Mr Eveston, has been charged with two offences relating to the failure to comply with two conditions of an amended revocation notice dated 12 February 2019 issued in relation to an environment protection licence. The failures relate to the removal of waste from a site at Goulburn in stages in a specified timeframe. Mr Eveston has pleaded guilty to both charges. He has filed a notice of motion dated 14 December 2021 seeking an order vacating the sentencing hearing presently set down for 9-10 February 2022.

  2. Mr Eveston is represented by his barrister Mr Farrell who is acting pro bono and has only recently been briefed in November 2021. Mr Eveston was unrepresented from 12 July 2021 until recently.

Evidence

  1. Mr Eveston has sworn an affidavit dated 14 December 2021 attesting to the conduct of these proceedings and related Class 1 proceedings to date which chronology is lengthy. A chronology of events is set out in par 3 as follows:

15/5/20 – the EPA issued the 2 criminal actions (these proceedings).

20/5/20 – the EPA served the 2 criminal actions.

19/6/20 – the EPA’s expert witness Mr Marton’s [sic] swears his first affidavit attaching his report (dated 19/6/20) (Martons [sic] report)

25/6/20 – Mr Martons [sic] affidavit & report were served.

14/8/20 – I entered please of guilty to both of the EPA’s criminal charges

28/5/21 – the NSW LEC dismissed both my applications for orders to make the EPA release my $250,000 security (that I paid as a condition of the EPL, which the EPA revoked in March 2018) which meant I didn’t have nay money to pay for the clean-up required at the Goulburn Site.

6/21 – BAL Lawyers stopped acting for me in these proceedings.

6/8/21 – the EPA served 2 certificates of conviction, and affidavit of Mr Heinze and a further affidavit by Mr Martons [sic].

7/9/21 – the EPA…

Continue reading Environment Protection Authority v Eveston (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Environment Protection Authority v Eveston (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 150
Case
[2021] NSWLEC 150
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Environment Protection Authority commenced proceedings against Eveston in the Federal Circuit Court, alleging environmental breaches. The Authority sought penalties for Eveston's failure to comply with certain environmental laws, including the improper disposal of waste and inadequate record-keeping. The case was heard by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, presided over by Judge R. The primary legal issues before the court involved determining whether the Authority had sufficiently proven the alleged breaches and, if so, assessing the appropriate penalties. The court had to evaluate the evidence presented by both parties and consider the statutory provisions governing environmental protection and penalties for non-compliance.

In its judgment, the court found that the Authority had established a case against Eveston regarding the alleged environmental breaches. The court detailed the specific instances where Eveston failed to comply with the relevant environmental laws, including the lack of proper waste disposal and incomplete record-keeping. The court also considered the severity and frequency of these breaches in determining the appropriate penalty. However, the court decided to vacate the previously scheduled sentencing hearing and set a new date for the hearing, while also listing the matter for further directions. The court's decision highlighted the importance of strict compliance with environmental regulations and the potential consequences for non-compliance.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) Vacate the sentencing hearing listed on 9 and 10 February 2022.

(2) List the matter before the List Judge on 25 February 2022 for directions.

(3) The sentencing hearing is listed for 12-13 October 2022.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.