El Assaad v Al Haje (No 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 34 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: El Assaad v Al Haje (No 2) [2025] NSWCA 17
Hearing dates: On the papers
Date of orders: 20 February 2025
Decision date: 20 February 2025
Before: Ward P; Ball JA; Price AJA
Decision:

1.   Vary order (2) made by this Court on 20 December 2024 and in lieu thereof order that order (1) made by Elkaim AJ on 6 June 2024 be set aside and judgment be entered for Mr Al Haje in the sum of $299,340.95, such judgment to take effect from 6 June 2024.

2.   Order Mr Al Haje to pay 50% of Mr El Assaad’s costs of the appeal.

Catchwords:

COSTS – Indemnity costs – Calderbank offer – where offer made between primary judgment and appeal hearing – whether rejection of offer unreasonable – whether to include post-judgment interest in determining whether offer is less favourable – whether post-judgment interest accrues from date of primary or appeal judgment

Legislation Cited:

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3, 98, 101

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.4, 42.16, 51.49

Cases Cited:

Al Haje v El Assaad [2024] NSWSC 13

Al Haje v Elassaad (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 794

Al Haje v Elassaad (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 1191

Al Haje v Elassaad [2024] NSWSC 689

Bathurst Regional Council as Trustee for the Bathurst City Council Crown Reserves Reserve Trust v Thompson (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 420

Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333

Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed (No 2) (2011) 80 NSWLR 210; [2011] NSWCA 6

Commissioner of State Revenue v Challenger Listed Investments Ltd (atf Challenger Diversified Property Trust 1) (No 2) [2011] VSCA 398

El Assaad v Al Haje [2024] NSWCA 306

Evans Shire Council v Richardson [2006] NSWCA 61

Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435; [2005] VSCA 298

Hunter v Roberts (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 235

Kabic v AAI Limited t/as GIO (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 311

Lambourne v Baker (No 5) [2024] NSWCA 241

Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341

Maitland Hospital v Fisher (No 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 721

Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344

Regency Media Pty Ltd v AAV Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 368

University of Wollongong v Metwally (1985) 60 ALR 68; [1985] HCA 28

Category:Costs
Parties: Mohammad El Assaad (Appellant)
Wisam Al Haje (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
R Perla with DF King (Appellant)
J Sheller SC with MD Algie (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Elias Gates & Associates (Appellant)
Greg Walsh & Co (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/242448
Publication restriction: Nil
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Common Law
Citation:

[2024] NSWSC 689

Date of Decision:
6 June 2024
Before:
Elkaim AJ
File Number(s):
2021/219805

JUDGMENT

  1. THE COURT: On 20 December 2024, this Court allowed in part an appeal by the appellant (Mr El Assaad) from orders…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read El Assaad v Al Haje (No 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2025] NSWCA 17
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The dispute in *El Assaad v Al Haje (No 2)* concerned an application for indemnity costs following an appeal. The Court of Appeal of New South Wales was required to determine whether a *Calderbank* offer made by the respondent, Mr Al Haje, was unreasonably rejected by the appellant, Mr El Assaad. A key aspect of this determination involved whether post-judgment interest should be included when assessing whether the offer was less favourable than the ultimate judgment.

The legal issues before the Court were whether the *Calderbank* offer, made between the primary judgment and the appeal hearing, was unreasonably rejected, and consequently, whether indemnity costs should be awarded. Specifically, the court had to consider the proper approach to calculating the value of the offer for the purpose of comparison with the judgment, particularly in relation to the accrual of post-judgment interest. The court needed to decide whether post-judgment interest should be calculated from the date of the primary judgment or the appeal judgment when evaluating the offer.

The Court of Appeal varied its previous order and set aside the primary judgment, entering judgment for Mr Al Haje in the sum of $299,340.95, effective from the date of the primary judgment. In relation to costs, the court ordered that Mr Al Haje pay 50% of Mr El Assaad’s costs of the appeal, indicating that the *Calderbank* offer, while relevant, did not warrant a full award of indemnity costs in favour of Mr Al Haje.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Vary order (2) made by this Court on 20 December 2024 and in lieu thereof order that order (1) made by Elkaim AJ on 6 June 2024 be set aside and judgment be entered for Mr Al Haje in the sum of $299,340.95, such judgment to take effect from 6 June 2024.

2. Order Mr Al Haje to pay 50% of Mr El Assaad’s costs of the appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.