Edgar Case (a pseudonym) v The King

Case [2023] HCASL 128


EDGAR CASE (A PSEUDONYM)

v

THE KING

[2023] HCASL 128
M35/2023

  1. The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from part of a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria (Emerton P, McLeish and Taylor JJA) by which it dismissed the applicant's appeal against conviction.

  2. The proposed ground of appeal does not identify any reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. An appeal to this Court would have insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought. Accordingly, the application should be dismissed.

  3. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

J.J. Edelman S.H.P. Steward
7 September 2023

Continue reading Edgar Case (a pseudonym) v The King

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Edgar Case (a pseudonym) v The King [2023] HCASL 128
Case
[2023] HCASL 128
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves Edgar Case, who is using a pseudonym, appealing against a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The Court of Appeal had dismissed an appeal by Case against his conviction. The High Court was asked to consider whether Case should be granted an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal part of the Court of Appeal's decision.

The main legal issue before the High Court was whether the proposed ground of appeal provided sufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. Another issue was whether an appeal to the High Court had sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The Court needed to determine whether granting an extension of time for Case to seek special leave to appeal would be futile.

The High Court found that the proposed ground of appeal did not provide any reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. An appeal to the High Court would have insufficient prospects of success, making it futile to grant the extension of time sought by Case. The Court concluded that the application should be dismissed and ordered that the Registrar draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision was made by Edelman and Steward on 7 September 2023.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.