| [2019] FWC 8162 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.251—Single interest employer authorisation
Early Learning Association of Australia Inc T/A Early Learning Association of Australia
(B2019/1225)
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 2 DECEMBER 2019 |
Application for a variation of a single interest employer authorisation – no change in circumstances of employers – obvious error, defect or irregularity – correction made.
[1] On 16 July 2019, I issued a single interest employer authorisation 1 under section 249 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Authorisation covers 412 employers in relation to bargaining for an enterprise agreement to replace the Victorian Early Childhood Teachers and Educators Agreement 2016.
[2] On 22 October 2019, the Early Learning Association of Australia applied under section 251 to vary the Authorisation to remove the following six entities, and for the following reasons:
Entity | Reason |
Bellevue Kindergarten Association Inc | Parent Advisory Group with no employees |
Kallista Kindergarten Association Inc | Part of Try Australia Children’s Services already listed in Authorisation |
Ringwood North Primary School | Does not operate pre-school program |
St Alipius Parish Church | Part of Eureka Community Kindergarten Inc. already listed in Authorisation |
Wimble Street Child Care Co-Operative Limited | Integrated service |
Yarragon Primary School | Separate enterprise agreement applies |
[3] Section 251 of the Act allows single interest employer authorisations to be varied to remove an employer – but only if the Commission is satisfied it is no longer appropriate that the employer be specified in the authorisation because of a change in the employer’s circumstances.
[4] As is apparent from the table above, the reason for the variation in each case is not that there has been a change in employer circumstances but that there was an error in compiling the list of employers to be covered by the Authorisation. None of the entities should have been on the list because they either were not employers, or will not be covered by the enterprise agreement or are already on the list under the umbrella of another entity. I am not persuaded that I can vary the Authorisation to remove any of the six entities under section 251.
[5] The error is one that is amenable to correction under section 602 because it is obvious that the six entities should not be, and should not have been, included on the list in relation to which the Authorisation was made.
[6] A correction order will issue separately and will operate from today.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR714777>
- AGLC
- Early Learning Association of Australia Inc T/A Early Learning Association of Australia [2019] FWC 8162
- Case
- [2019] FWC 8162
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the tribunal was whether the application for variation was justified based on an obvious error, defect, or irregularity in the original authorisation, despite no change in the circumstances of the employers. The association argued that the error was apparent and needed correction to ensure the authorisation accurately reflected the intended scope of their activities. The tribunal had to determine whether the association's application met the criteria for a variation under the applicable legislation.
The tribunal examined the application and found that the error in the authorisation was indeed obvious and warranted correction. The tribunal acknowledged that there had been no change in the circumstances of the employers, but the presence of an obvious error justified the variation. The tribunal concluded that allowing the variation was necessary to correct the defect and ensure the authorisation accurately represented the association's activities. As a result, the tribunal granted the application for variation.
The tribunal's decision resulted in the variation of the Early Learning Association of Australia Inc's single interest employer authorisation to correct the identified error. The tribunal's order specified the corrected terms of the authorisation, aligning it with the association's intended scope of activities. This outcome ensured that the authorisation accurately reflected the association's operations and complied with the relevant legislative requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.