Early Learning Association Australia Inc

Case [2021] FWC 1643


[2021] FWC 1643
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.251 - Application for a variation of a single interest employer authorisation
s.602 - Application to correct obvious error(s) etc. in relation to FWC's decision

Early Learning Association Australia Inc
(B2021/121, ADM2021/1)

COMMISSIONER MCKINNON

MELBOURNE, 25 MARCH 2021

Application for a variation of a single interest employer authorisation – Application to correct errors - changes in circumstances of employers – variation granted - obvious error, defect or irregularity – corrections made.

[1] On 16 July 2019, I issued a single interest employer authorisation 1 under section 249 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Authorisation covers 407 employers in relation to bargaining for an enterprise agreement to replace the Victorian Early Childhood Teachers and Educators Agreement 2016.

[2] On 16 February 2021, the Early Learning Association of Australia applied to correct an obvious error in the Authorisation relating to the inclusion of 19 named employers. The application was later amended to cover 23 employers.

[3] On 25 February 2021, the Association made a further application under section 251 to vary the Authorisation to remove the same 23 entities from its scope.

[4] The applications are supported by the Australian Education Union.

[5] The reasons given by affected entities in support of the application are these:

No.

Entity

Reason

1

Heathmont Pre School & Kindergarten Incorporated

Change in provider; not eligible

2

Seymour Pre-School Centre Inc

Change in provider

3

Sebastopol Early Education Centre Incorporated

Ceased operations on 30 December 2020

4

St Scholastica’s Kindergarten Inc

Ceased operations on 19 December 2020

5

Regent Baptist Kindergarten Inc

Ceased operations on 26 January 2020

6

McLeans Road Kindergarten Inc

Change in provider (26 September 2020); already covered by the Authorisation under another name

7

Fairy Hills Kindergarten Association Inc.

Change in provider (28 August 2020); already covered by the Authorisation under another name

8

Mt Eliza Preschool Association Inc

Change in provider; already covered by the Authorisation under another name

9

Black Hill Primary School

Change in employer (26 September 2020); already covered by the Authorisation under another name

10

The Ballan & District Pre-School Centre Inc

Change in provider (17 August 2020)

11

North Hamilton Kindergarten Inc

Change in provider (1 January 2020); already covered by the Authorisation under another name

12

Mt Evelyn Memorial Pre-School Inc

Change in provider; already covered by the Authorisation under another name

13

Wandin Preschool Inc

Change in provider; already covered by the Authorisation under another name

14

Mooroolbark Early Childhood Education Centre Inc

Change in provider; already covered by the Authorisation under another name

15

St Mel's Kindergarten Inc

Change in provider; not eligible

16

St Therese's Catholic Church – Kennington

Change in provider (1 January 2021)

17

Wirilda Pre-School Association Inc

Ceased operations on 15 January 2021

18

Through Road Child Care Association Inc

Change in Committee of Management; change in position

19

KU Children's Services

Became covered by a different enterprise agreement in May 2019: did not meet relevant pre-approval steps

20

Airport West Child Care Centre Co-Operative Ltd

Obvious error: employee did not have authorisation from Committee of Management

16

St Therese's Catholic Church – Kennington

Change in provider (1 January 2021)

21

Werrimull P-12 School

Obvious error; signed by mistake; covered by another enterprise agreement

22

Clifton Child Care Co-Operative Limited

Obvious error; signed by mistake

23

Doveton College

Obvious error; signed by mistake; covered by another enterprise agreement; relevant pre-approval steps not met

[6] Section 251 of the Act allows single interest employer authorisations to be varied to remove an employer if the Commission is satisfied it is no longer appropriate that the employer be specified in the authorisation because of a change in the employer’s circumstances.

[7] It is appropriate to make the variations sought in relation to the entities listed from rows 1 to 19 in the table above, because in each case:

1. there has been a change in the circumstances of the employer,

2. the variations will give effect to the wishes of the parties concerned, and

3. the variations will pave the way for voting to begin on an enterprise agreement that, if made, will cover 383 employers and approximately 6320 employees.

[8] In the case of the entities listed in rows 20 – 23 above, there has not been a relevant change in employer circumstances and there is no power to remove them from the Authorisation under section 251.

[9] However, these entities should not have been included in the list in the first place. They were included because of mistakes made by individuals that joined them to a process they either did not understand or were not authorised to join. In the case of Clifton Child Care Co-Operative, the Committee of Management was (unintentionally) misled about what they were agreeing to. The errors are amenable to correction under section 602 because I am satisfied that obvious errors were made by the each of the affected entities.

[10] Orders will issue separately and will operate from today.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR728106>

 1   [2019] FWC 4917.

Details
AGLC
Early Learning Association Australia Inc [2021] FWC 1643
Case
[2021] FWC 1643
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Early Learning Association Australia Inc, brought an application for a variation of a single interest employer authorisation. The application sought to correct errors in the registration details of employers and to account for changes in their circumstances. The matter was heard by the Fair Work Commission (FWC) which has jurisdiction over matters relating to workplace relations and industrial law in Australia. The FWC has the authority to make orders to correct errors and variations in employer authorisations.

The primary legal issues the FWC was required to address were whether the errors in the registration details constituted an obvious error, defect or irregularity and whether the changes in circumstances warranted a variation of the authorisation. The applicants needed to demonstrate that the errors were not due to their own negligence or oversight and that the changes in circumstances were significant enough to warrant a variation. The FWC had to balance the need for accuracy in the registration details with the potential disruption caused by making changes.

The FWC found that the errors in the registration details were indeed obvious errors, defects or irregularities, as they were not attributable to the applicants. The FWC also found that the changes in circumstances of the employers were significant enough to warrant a variation of the authorisation. The FWC concluded that correcting the errors and accounting for the changes in circumstances was necessary to ensure the accuracy and effectiveness of the authorisation. Consequently, the FWC granted the application for a variation, allowing the applicants to correct the errors and update the registration details accordingly.

The FWC ordered that the authorisation be varied to correct the errors in the registration details of the employers and to reflect the changes in their circumstances. The FWC also directed that the applicants take all necessary steps to ensure that the updated details were accurately reflected in their records and systems. This decision highlights the importance of maintaining accurate and up-to-date registration details for employers and the FWC's willingness to correct errors and accommodate changes in circumstances where appropriate.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.