Dywidag Systems International Pty Ltd v Melksham

Link copied
Case Copied 49 min read
DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR
CITATION: Dywidag Systems International Pty Ltd v Melksham [2020] NSWWCCPD 41
APPELLANT: Dywidag Systems International Pty Ltd
RESPONDENT: Rodney Stephen Melksham
INSURER: Allianz Australia Workers Compensation (NSW) Limited
FILE NUMBER: A1-5332/19
ARBITRATOR: Mr P Young
DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION: 10 December 2019
DATE OF APPEAL DECISION: 30 June 2020
SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: Section 4 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 – whether the Arbitrator was required to determine the pathology arising from an injurious event – Jaffariev Quality Castings Pty Ltd [2014] NSWWCCPD 79 considered and applied
PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: Deputy President Elizabeth Wood
HEARING: On the papers
REPRESENTATION: Appellant:
Ms K Balendra, counsel
Hicksons Lawyers
Respondent:
Mr G Levick, counsel
Michael Evers & Co
ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL:

1. The Arbitrator’s finding that the respondent suffered injury to his right knee in the form of an aggravation or acceleration of a disease in accordance with s 4(b)(ii) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 as a result of the respondent’s employment between 26 June 2007 and 30 June 2013 to which employment was the main contributing factor is confirmed.

2.     The Arbitrator’s finding that the respondent suffered an injury to his left knee on 26 June 2007 is revoked.

3.     The issues of whether the respondent suffered:

(a)   an injury to the left knee (including the nature of the injury) on 26 June 2007, and

(b)   an injury to the left knee in the form of an aggravation or acceleration of a disease as a result of the nature and conditions of employment from 26 June 2007 to 30 June 2013

are remitted to a different arbitrator for determination.

4.     The Arbitrator’s orders remitting the matter to the Registrar for referral to the Approved Medical Specialists for assessment of the whole person impairment of the cervical spine, both upper extremities, gastrointestinal condition and the right lower extremity are stayed until the outcome of the determination of the injuries to the left knee referred above.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

  1. Mr Rodney Stephen Melksham (the respondent) brought proceedings for lump sum compensation pursuant to s 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (the 1987 Act) in respect of an injury on 26 June 2007 when he fell in the course of his employment. The respondent was employed by Dywidag Systems International Pty Ltd (the appellant) as a builder/carpenter. The respondent alleged injury to the neck, right shoulder, left shoulder, left knee and an upper and lower gastrointestinal condition consequent upon the ingestion of the medication required to treat those injuries.

  2. The respondent also claimed s 66 entitlements in respect of injury to the right and left knees alleged to have occurred as a result of the “nature and conditions” of his employment, which required him to perform heavy lifting, climb up and down ladders and stairs, kneeling and squatting. This was described as an aggravation, acceleration, exacerbation or deterioration of osteoarthritis in both of the respondent’s knees and…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Dywidag Systems International Pty Ltd v Melksham and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] NSWWCCPD 41
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Dywidag Systems International Pty Ltd v Melksham, the Court reviewed a decision made by an arbitrator under the Workers Compensation Act 1987. The dispute centred on the injuries suffered by the respondent, Melksham, in relation to his employment with Dywidag Systems International Pty Ltd. The arbitrator had determined that Melksham had sustained injuries to his knees, both on a specific date and over a period of time, but the employer contested these findings. The case was heard in the Industrial Division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The central legal issue was whether the arbitrator was required to determine the pathology arising from an injurious event, a question that was considered in light of the precedent set by Jaffarie v Quality Castings Pty Ltd. The court needed to decide if the arbitrator's role extended to identifying the specific pathology of the injuries, or if it was sufficient for the arbitrator to conclude that an injury occurred based on the evidence presented.

The court found that the arbitrator had not sufficiently identified the pathology of the injuries, particularly those to the left knee, and therefore did not properly address the nature and extent of the injuries. The court held that the arbitrator's role included determining the specific nature of the injuries, and not merely acknowledging that an injury occurred. Consequently, the findings regarding the left knee injuries were revoked and the matter was remitted to a different arbitrator for further determination. The court also stayed the orders regarding the referral to Approved Medical Specialists pending the outcome of the re-determination of the left knee injuries.

The court's orders confirmed the finding that Melksham had suffered an aggravation or acceleration of a disease in his right knee due to his employment. However, the findings related to the left knee were annulled, and the issues were remitted to a new arbitrator. The orders regarding the referral for assessment of other conditions were stayed until the left knee injuries were re-determined.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The Arbitrator’s finding that the respondent suffered injury to his right knee in the form of an aggravation or acceleration of a disease in accordance with s 4(b)(ii) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 as a result of the respondent’s employment between 26 June 2007 and 30 June 2013 to which employment was the main contributing factor is confirmed.

2. The Arbitrator’s finding that the respondent suffered an injury to his left knee on 26 June 2007 is revoked.

3. The issues of whether the respondent suffered:

(a) an injury to the left knee (including the nature of the injury) on 26 June 2007, and

(b) an injury to the left knee in the form of an aggravation or acceleration of a disease as a result of the nature and conditions of employment from 26 June 2007 to 30 June 2013

are remitted to a different arbitrator for determination.

4. The Arbitrator’s orders remitting the matter to the Registrar for referral to the Approved Medical Specialists for assessment of the whole person impairment of the cervical spine, both upper extremities, gastrointestinal condition and the right lower extremity are stayed until the outcome of the determination of the injuries to the left knee referred above.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.