SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Dupois & Anor v Galley Commodities Pty Ltd & Anor [2016] QSC 167
PARTIES:
CHARLES DUPOIS and ONE WORLD MUSIC FILM AND TV PTY LTD
ACN 139 986 753
(plaintiffs)v
GALLEY COMMODITIES PTY LTD
ACN 607 868 548
(first defendant)
and
LLOYD GALLEY(second defendant)
FILE NO:
SC No 12607 of 2015
DIVISION:
Trial Division
PROCEEDING:
Civil Trial
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court of Queensland at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
3 August 2016
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
24 and 26 May 2016
JUDGE:
Applegarth J
ORDER:
Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendants in the sum of $100
CATCHWORDS:
CONTRACTS – GENERAL CONTRACTUAL PRINCIPLES – CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTS – INTERPRETATION OF MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACTS AND OTHER MATTERS – where the defendants agreed to invest Trade Currency in the production of music videos for the plaintiffs’ songs – where the defendants agreed to set up a Trade Currency account in the name of the second plaintiff with an amount of $300,000 in Trade Currency in it – where, although not recorded in the contract, the account could only be set up with approval from the operator of the Trade Currency Exchange – where an account in the name of the second plaintiff was not set up – whether the defendants breached the contract by failing to set up the Trade Currency account – whether the plaintiffs have proved loss and damage arising from any breach
McCann v Switzerland InsuranceAustralia Ltd (2000) 203 CLR 579, cited
Rodin v Voyler Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 414, cited
Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332, citedSmith v South Wales Switchgear Ltd [1978] 1 All ER 18, cited
COUNSEL:
Mr Dupois appeared for the plaintiffs
T Gray for the defendants
SOLICITORS:
Viana Lawyers for the defendants
The plaintiff, Mr Dupois, is a recording artist. The other plaintiff, One World Music Film and TV Pty Ltd (“One World”), is his company. In November 2015 the plaintiffs were interested in obtaining finance to produce music videos for two of Mr Dupois’ works, songs called “Girls, Girls, Girls” and “It’s a Sexual Thing”.
The first defendant, Galley Commodities Pty Ltd, is controlled by the second defendant, Mr Galley. In November 2015, the defendants were associated with a Trade Currency business named BBX International Ltd.
Discussions occurred between the plaintiffs and the defendants about using BBX Trade Currency to pay for the costs of producing the two music videos. This led to:
(a)an initial contract dated 9 November 2015;
(b)a further agreement dated 10 November 2015, styled “Understanding and Undertaking”; and
(c)an addendum contract dated 24 November 2015.
In essence, the defendants as “The Investor” initially agreed to set up a “Trade Currency Account with Card Access in the sum of AUD $300,000.00 (Trade Currency)” in the name of One World as part of a budgeted amount of $550,000 or its equivalent in Trade Currency. The facility was to be provided within 14 days from the signing…
Continue reading Dupois v Galley Commodities Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Dupois v Galley Commodities Pty Ltd [2016] QSC 167
- Case
- [2016] QSC 167
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the defendants breached the contract by failing to establish the Trade Currency account. The court considered whether the requirement for approval from the Trade Currency Exchange operator was an implied term of the contract, and whether the failure to establish the account resulted in a breach of contract. The court also needed to determine whether the plaintiffs had proved loss and damage arising from the alleged breach.
The court held that the requirement for approval from the Trade Currency Exchange operator was an implied term of the contract, and that the defendants breached the contract by failing to establish the Trade Currency account. The court found that the plaintiffs had proved loss and damage arising from the breach, and awarded damages of $100 to the plaintiffs. The court held that the failure to establish the Trade Currency account was a material breach of the contract, and that the plaintiffs were entitled to damages for the breach.
The court made a final order that judgment be entered for the plaintiffs against the defendants in the sum of $100. The court held that the plaintiffs had proved their case, and that the defendants were liable for the breach of contract. The court ordered the defendants to pay the plaintiffs damages in the sum of $100, together with interest and costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendants in the sum of $100
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.