Duncan v Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW

Case [2007] NSWWCCPD 113


WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION

DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR

CITATION:Duncan v Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW and Anor [2007] NSWWCCPD 113

APPELLANT:  Peter Wayne Duncan

FIRST RESPONDENT:  Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW

SECOND RESPONDENT:  Sungate Pty Limited

INSURERS:GIO General Limited (First Respondent prior to 30 June 1989)

GIO (Treasury Managed Fund) (First Respondent subsequent to 30 June 1989)
GIO Workers Compensation (NSW) Limited (Second Respondent)

FILE NUMBER:  WCC13735-04

DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISIONS:        24 November 2005 and 18 January 2006

DATE OF APPEAL DECISION:  15 May 2007

SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: Meaning of ‘decision’ in section 352 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998; extension of time; application of the ‘disease’ provisions of the Workers Compensation Act 1987; medical histories and section 60 of the Evidence Act 1995; section 40 assessment – intermittency of employment; notice of injury pursuant to section 61 of the 1998 Act.

PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER:  Acting Deputy President Michael Snell

HEARING:On the papers

REPRESENTATION:  Appellant: McCabe Partners  

Respondent: Thompson Cooper (First Respondent – prior to 30 June 1989)

Leitch Hasson & Dent (First Respondent – after 30 June 1989)

Abbott Tout (Second Respondent)

ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL:  The decision of the Arbitrator, dated 18 January 2006, is revoked and the following decision is made in its place:

1. That the First Respondent Employer in respect of its insurance interest on risk as at

26 February 1993 pay the Appellant Worker weekly compensation pursuant to section 40 of the 1987 Act as follows:

(i)      $88.69 from 27 February 1993 to 30 June 1993;

(ii)     $98.21 from 1 July 1993 to 30 June 1994;

(iii)   $123.28 from 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995;

(iv)   $250.80 from 1 July 1995 to 30 September 1995;

(v)     $252.10 from 1 October 1995 to 31 March 1996;

(vi)   $253.70 from 1 April 1996 to 30 June 1996;

(vii)     $190.54 from 1 July 1996 to 30 June 1997;

(viii)   $256.40 from 1 July 1997 to 30 September 1997;

(ix)   $261.30 from 1 October 1997 to 31 March 1998;

(x)     $263.30 from 1 April 1998 to 30 September 1998;

(xi)   $267.90 from 1 October 1998 to 31 March 1999;

(xii)     $272.60 from 1 April 1999 to 30 June 1999;

(xiii)   $68.18 from 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001;

(xiv)   $243.94 from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002;

(xv)     $128.36 from 1 July 2002 to date and continuing.

2.  That the First Respondent Employer in respect of its insurance interest on risk as at 26 February 1993 pay the Appellant Worker’s expenses pursuant to section 60 of the 1987 Act.

3. That the First Respondent Employer in respect of its insurance interest on risk as at 26 February 1993 pay the Appellant Worker’s costs of the proceedings before the arbitrator, and of this appeal. No order as to the costs of the other insurance interest of the First Respondent Employer, or of the Second Respondent Employer.

4.  Award for the…

Details
AGLC
Duncan v Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW [2007] NSWWCCPD 113
Case
[2007] NSWWCCPD 113
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Duncan v Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW involved an appeal against the decision of an arbitrator in a workers compensation claim. The appellant, Peter Wayne Duncan, claimed weekly compensation, medical expenses, and lump sum compensation from two employers, the Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW and Sungate Pty Limited, due to injuries sustained during his employment. The arbitrator found against the appellant, concluding he was not injured in the employment of either employer and was not incapacitated for any relevant period. The appeal focused on the interpretation of legal provisions, the application of medical evidence, and the determination of incapacity and injury dates.

The court examined whether the arbitrator's decision was appealable and granted leave to appeal due to exceptional circumstances. It found that the arbitrator erred in not applying the correct legal test regarding the 'disease' provisions and misstated the medical evidence. The court re-determined the matter, finding that the appellant suffered injuries to his knees and back, which were aggravated by his employment with the Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW. The court calculated the weekly compensation based on the appellant's probable earnings and his capacity to earn in suitable employment, considering factors such as intermittency of employment and the impact of other health conditions.

The court also addressed the issue of notice of injury, concluding that any defects in the notice were excusable under the relevant legislation. It revoked the arbitrator's decision and made an order for weekly compensation, medical expenses, and referred the lump sum compensation claim to approved medical specialists for assessment. The insurance interest of the First Respondent Employer on risk as at the deemed date of injury was ordered to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.