Legal Research
Cases
DPP v Campbell & Ors (Ruling No 1)

DPP v Campbell & Ors (Ruling No 1)

Case [2013] VSC 665

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Campbell (Ruling No 1) [2013] VSC 665
Case: [2013] VSC 665
Decision Date: 25 October 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Campbell (Ruling No 1) [2013] VSC 665

Most Recent Citation

Director of Public Prosecutions v Duckworth [2022] VCC 1733

Cases Citing This Decision

Ward v The King [2025] VSCA 101
Citation 1 (Para 8)

…ative value to the establishment of a particular reasonable possibility of a state of facts consistent with the innocence of the accused person. [53] [2013] VSC 665, [35], [41] (Kaye J).…
The King v Roberts [2024] NTSC 81
Citation 2 (Para 41)

…[4] DPP v Campbell & Ors (Ruling No 1) [2013] VSC 665 at [41].…
The King v Kopp [2024] NTSC 22
Citation 3 (Para 41)

…[4] DPP v Campbell & Ors (Ruling No 1) [2013] VSC 665 at [41].…
The Queen v Majak [2022] NTSC 57
Citation 4

…BD v The Queen [2017] NTCCA 2; DF Lyons Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 28 FCR 597; Director of Public Prosecutions v Campbell (No 1) [2013] VSC 665; Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v Dixon (Ruling No 1) [2020] VSC 743; DPP v Wilson [2021] VSC 766; Dupas v The Queen (2012) 40 VR 182; El-Hadd…
The Queen v Drover (No. 2) [2022] NTSC 13
Citation 5

…rm Legislation) Act 2011 (NT)) - Application refused. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) ss 97, 135 DPP v Campbell (Ruling No 1) [2013] VSC 665; R v Smiler (No 2) [2017] NTSC 31; R v Nudgulu [2020] NTSC 54; R v Hulme (No 5) [2021] NSWSC 115 distinguished.…
The Queen v Marawar [2019] NTSC 84
Citation 6

…Director of Public Prosecutions v Campbell (No 1) [2013] VSC 665; R v Smiler (No 2) [2017] NTSC 31, referred to REPRESENTATION: Counsel: Crown:M Seiler Accused:G Chipkin Solicitors: Crown:Director of Public Prosecutions Accused:North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Judgment category classification: C Judgmen…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Mehdi & Ors (Ruling 1) [2024] VSC 830
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…, and his ruling was conditional on that being done. His Honour ruled that the tendency evidence sought to be led was admissible.[12] [10][2013] VSC 665 (‘ Campbell ’). [11]Ibid 7 [31]. [12]It was common ground that if the tendency evidence was admitted, the trial of C and R should be heard separately to the tria…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Roberts (Ruling No 15) [2022] VSC 345
Citation 8 (Para 1)

…thful.[1] [1]Cf R v Lockyer (1989) 89 A Crim R 457, 459–60 (Hunt CJ at CL); R v Cakovski (2004) 149 A Crim R 21; DPP v Campbell & Ors (Ruling No 1) [2013] VSC 665, [41] (Kaye J).…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Wilson (Ruling) [2021] VSC 766
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…om that taken where it is the prosecution who seeks to adduce tendency evidence has long been recognised. [21] DPP v Campbell & Ors (Ruling No 1) [2013] VSC 665 (‘ Campbell ’), [41].…
R v Wilio (Ruling No 2) [2021] VSC 606
Citation 10

…[19][2013] VSC 665.…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dixon (Ruling No 1) [2020] VSC 743
Citation 11

…[20][2013] VSC 665.…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Duckworth [2022] VCC 1733
Citation 12

…stablishment of a particular reasonable possibility of a state of facts consistent with the innocence of the accused person.[7] [6] [2013] VSC 665. [7] Ibid [41] Section 342 30Section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic) sets out the matters I must consider in determining the application: In the course of…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Semaan v The Queen [2013] VSCA 134
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…lme J); Middendorp v R [2012] VSCA 47, [20] (Redlich JA). [3] CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26, [37]-[38] (Maxwell P, Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA); R v Semaan [2013] VSCA 134, [32] (Priest JA). [4] GBF v R [2010] VSCA 135, [31] (Nettle JA, Harper JA and Hansen AJA).…
R v White [2012] NSWSC 467
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…s significant probative value in relation to the particular fact in issue in the case.[4] [2] R v PWD , [64]; CEG v R [2012] VSCA 55, [72]; R v White [2012] NSWSC 467, [57] (Hulme J); Middendorp v R [2012] VSCA 47, [20] (Redlich JA). [3] CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26, [37]-[38] (Maxwell P, Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA); R…
CEG v The Queen [2012] VSCA 55
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…that evidence of the tendency has significant probative value in relation to the particular fact in issue in the case.[4] [2] R v PWD , [64]; CEG v R [2012] VSCA 55, [72]; R v White [2012] NSWSC 467, [57] (Hulme J); Middendorp v R [2012] VSCA 47, [20] (Redlich JA). [3] CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26, [37]-[38] (Maxwell…
Middendorp v The Queen [2012] VSCA 47
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…particular fact in issue in the case.[4] [2] R v PWD , [64]; CEG v R [2012] VSCA 55, [72]; R v White [2012] NSWSC 467, [57] (Hulme J); Middendorp v R [2012] VSCA 47, [20] (Redlich JA). [3] CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26, [37]-[38] (Maxwell P, Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA); R v Semaan [2013] VSCA 134, [32] (Priest JA). [4…
R v PWD [2010] NSWCCA 209
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…consideration in the particular case.[1] [1] R v Cittadini [2008] NSWCCA 256, [22]-[23] (Simpson J, with whom McClellan CJ at CL agreed); R v PWD [2010] NSWCCA 209, [59]-[63] (Beasley JA, Buddin J and Barr AJ).…
JLS v The Queen [2010] VSCA 209
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…to ‘important’ or ‘ of consequence’ … “. [8] R v Lock (1997) 91 A Crim R 356, 360-1; R v PWD [2010] NSWCCA 209, [66]; JLS v R [2010] VSCA 209, [18] (Redlich JA, with whom Mandie and Bongiorno JJA agreed). [9][2013] VSCA 134, [38].…
GBF v The Queen [2010] VSCA 135
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…dlich JA). [3] CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26, [37]-[38] (Maxwell P, Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA); R v Semaan [2013] VSCA 134, [32] (Priest JA). [4] GBF v R [2010] VSCA 135, [31] (Nettle JA, Harper JA and Hansen AJA).…
CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26
Citation 8 (Para 1)

…PWD , [64]; CEG v R [2012] VSCA 55, [72]; R v White [2012] NSWSC 467, [57] (Hulme J); Middendorp v R [2012] VSCA 47, [20] (Redlich JA). [3] CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26, [37]-[38] (Maxwell P, Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA); R v Semaan [2013] VSCA 134, [32] (Priest JA). [4] GBF v R [2010] VSCA 135, [31] (Nettle JA, Harpe…
R v Cittadini [2008] NSWCCA 256
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…of mind, or acted in a particular way, in respect of the circumstances which are under consideration in the particular case.[1] [1] R v Cittadini [2008] NSWCCA 256, [22]-[23] (Simpson J, with whom McClellan CJ at CL agreed); R v PWD [2010] NSWCCA 209, [59]-[63] (Beasley JA, Buddin J and Barr AJ).…
Spruill v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 39
Citation 10 (Para 1)

…ed.[13] On the other hand, Hidden JA considered the evidence was tendency evidence. [13]Cf Elias v R [2006] NSWCCA 365, [31] (Simpson J); Spruill v R [2008] NSWCCA 39.…
Elias v R [2006] NSWCCA 365
Citation 11 (Para 1)

…e relevant threats alleged on behalf of the accused.[13] On the other hand, Hidden JA considered the evidence was tendency evidence. [13]Cf Elias v R [2006] NSWCCA 365, [31] (Simpson J); Spruill v R [2008] NSWCCA 39.…
R v Cakovski [2004] NSWCCA 280
Citation 12 (Para 1)

…e, and, secondly, that a few hours before his death, the victim had threatened to kill another person “like I killed the other three people”. [12][2004] NSWCCA 280.…

AI Chat coming soon