Dong v Song (No 2)

The case of Dong v Song (No 2) involved a dispute between the plaintiff, Dong, and the defendants, Song, concerning alleged misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to a property transaction. The matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. Dong alleged that Song had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by failing to disclose material information during negotiations to purchase a property, which ultimately resulted in financial loss for Dong.

The central legal issues revolved around whether the relationship between the parties created a reasonable expectation of disclosure, and if the failure to disclose information constituted misleading and deceptive conduct. Additionally, the court had to determine whether there was a causative link between the alleged misleading and deceptive conduct and the financial damages claimed by Dong.

The court found that the relationship between the parties did indeed create a reasonable expectation of disclosure. It was held that Song was obligated to provide all relevant information that could impact Dong's decision to proceed with the purchase. The court ruled that Song's failure to disclose significant information about the property amounted to misleading and deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law. Furthermore, the court found that there was a causative link between this conduct and the financial loss suffered by Dong.

The court ordered that judgment be entered in favour of Dong, awarding damages in the sum of $251,503, along with interest amounting to $51,472.06. The defendants were directed to pay Dong's costs. Execution of the order for payment of costs was stayed for 7 days to allow for any potential appeal.