W Scott Fell & Co Ltd v Lloyd

Link copied
Case Copied 26 min read

[1906.

572   HIGH COUKT

_ [H K ;H c o u r t Ob’

A U S T R A L IA .]

W. SCOTT, FELL AND COMPANY, LIMITED

A p p e l l a n t s ;

P l a i n t i f f s ,

ANO

F. H. LLOYD

R e s p o n d e n t .

D e f e n d a n t ,

ON A P P E A L FROM T H E S U P R E M E C O U R T

OF

N E W SO UTH

W A LES.

H. C. OF A.

Action on contract—Sale o f goods—Equitable plea— Contract induced by concealment

1906.  oj material fac ts—Fraud.

In an action by a purchaser against a vendor for non-delivery on a contract for the sale of coal whicli th e vendor had previously contrac ted to buy from

Sydney ,

Dec. 10, I I .

a colliery com pany, the defendant pleaded, as a defence upon equitable

Gritfith C. T., grounds, th a t before the m aking of the con trac t sued upon the colliery com­

Barton and

Isaacs JJ.pany w ith whom he had contracted for the supply of th e coal had agreed w ith

o ther persons no t to supply coal for sh ipm ent to South A ustra lia except to those persons, and had accordingly refused to supply coal to th e plaintiflfs for th a t purpose, and the plaintiffs, by fraudu len tly concealing from the de­ fendan t those facts and th e fac t th a t they in tended to sh ip th e coal in question to South A ustra lia , induced th e defendant to en te r in to th e co n trac t sued upon, and the colliery company refused to deliver th e coal, a t th e defendan t’s order, to the plaintiffs, which was the non-delivery sued for, and the de­ fendan t thereupon repudiated th e contract. T here being no allegation to the con trary in the plea, i t was to be assum ed as against th e defendan t th a t the agreem ent by the company no t to supply coal was subsequent to th e con tract of sale betw een th e company and the defendant.

Held, th a t the facts alleged to have been concealed by th e purchasers from the vendor were no t such as th e purchasers w ere bound by any d u ty to disclose, and therefore th e mere non-disclosure of them did not, under th e circum ­ stances alleged, am ount to fraudu len t concealm ent such as w ould en title the vendor, e ither in law or in equ ity , to be relieved from perform ance of the con tract, and th e plea…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read W Scott Fell & Co Ltd v Lloyd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1906] HCA 79
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

W Scott Fell & Co Ltd (the appellant) appealed to the High Court of Australia from a judgment of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute concerned a contract for the sale of goods, where the appellant sought to rely on an equitable plea that the contract had been induced by the concealment of material facts, amounting to fraud on the part of the respondent, Lloyd.

The central legal issue before the High Court was whether the equitable defence of fraud, specifically in the context of concealment of material facts inducing a contract, was available to the appellant in an action for breach of contract. The court was required to consider the nature of fraud in equity and its application to contractual agreements, particularly where one party had failed to disclose information that was crucial to the other party's decision to enter into the contract.

The High Court held that the equitable plea of fraud, based on concealment of material facts, was indeed a valid defence to an action on a contract. The court reasoned that where a contract is induced by fraudulent misrepresentation or concealment, equity will intervene to set aside the contract. This principle applies even if the concealed facts are not strictly conditions precedent to the contract, but rather are material to the party's decision to contract. The court affirmed that the equitable doctrine of fraud encompasses not only active misrepresentation but also the deliberate non-disclosure of material facts that a party is aware of and which are likely to influence the other party's judgment.

The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the Supreme Court and remitting the matter for a new trial.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.