[1906.
572 HIGH COUKT
_ [H K ;H c o u r t Ob’
A U S T R A L IA .]
W. SCOTT, FELL AND COMPANY, LIMITED
A p p e l l a n t s ;
P l a i n t i f f s ,
ANO
F. H. LLOYD
R e s p o n d e n t .
D e f e n d a n t ,
ON A P P E A L FROM T H E S U P R E M E C O U R T
OF
N E W SO UTH
W A LES.
H. C. OF A.
Action on contract—Sale o f goods—Equitable plea— Contract induced by concealment
1906. oj material fac ts—Fraud.
In an action by a purchaser against a vendor for non-delivery on a contract for the sale of coal whicli th e vendor had previously contrac ted to buy from
Sydney ,
Dec. 10, I I .
a colliery com pany, the defendant pleaded, as a defence upon equitable
Gritfith C. T., grounds, th a t before the m aking of the con trac t sued upon the colliery com
Barton and
Isaacs JJ.pany w ith whom he had contracted for the supply of th e coal had agreed w ith
o ther persons no t to supply coal for sh ipm ent to South A ustra lia except to those persons, and had accordingly refused to supply coal to th e plaintiflfs for th a t purpose, and the plaintiffs, by fraudu len tly concealing from the de fendan t those facts and th e fac t th a t they in tended to sh ip th e coal in question to South A ustra lia , induced th e defendant to en te r in to th e co n trac t sued upon, and the colliery company refused to deliver th e coal, a t th e defendan t’s order, to the plaintiffs, which was the non-delivery sued for, and the de fendan t thereupon repudiated th e contract. T here being no allegation to the con trary in the plea, i t was to be assum ed as against th e defendan t th a t the agreem ent by the company no t to supply coal was subsequent to th e con tract of sale betw een th e company and the defendant.
Held, th a t the facts alleged to have been concealed by th e purchasers from the vendor were no t such as th e purchasers w ere bound by any d u ty to disclose, and therefore th e mere non-disclosure of them did not, under th e circum stances alleged, am ount to fraudu len t concealm ent such as w ould en title the vendor, e ither in law or in equ ity , to be relieved from perform ance of the con tract, and th e plea…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read W Scott Fell & Co Ltd v Lloyd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1906] HCA 79
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the High Court was whether the equitable defence of fraud, specifically in the context of concealment of material facts inducing a contract, was available to the appellant in an action for breach of contract. The court was required to consider the nature of fraud in equity and its application to contractual agreements, particularly where one party had failed to disclose information that was crucial to the other party's decision to enter into the contract.
The High Court held that the equitable plea of fraud, based on concealment of material facts, was indeed a valid defence to an action on a contract. The court reasoned that where a contract is induced by fraudulent misrepresentation or concealment, equity will intervene to set aside the contract. This principle applies even if the concealed facts are not strictly conditions precedent to the contract, but rather are material to the party's decision to contract. The court affirmed that the equitable doctrine of fraud encompasses not only active misrepresentation but also the deliberate non-disclosure of material facts that a party is aware of and which are likely to influence the other party's judgment.
The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the Supreme Court and remitting the matter for a new trial.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.