| CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER | |
| CITATION: | Do v Lucky Thanh Transport Pty Ltd [2025] NSWPIC 340 |
| APPLICANT: | Van Thanh Do |
| RESPONDENT: | Lucky Thanh Transport Pty Ltd |
| MEMBER: | Fiona Seaton |
| DATE OF DECISION: | 16 July 2025 |
| CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS COMPENSATION - Workers Compensation Act 1987; claim for weekly payments, medical expenses and lump sum compensation pursuant to section 66; whether applicant sustained injuries to his spine; left knee and bilateral shoulders; Held – applicant sustained disease injuries to his spine, left knee and left shoulder and a consequential right shoulder condition on deemed date of injury 21 August 2021; weekly payments and medical expenses payable; matter remitted to President for referral to a Medical Assessor to assess the degree of permanent impairment. |
| DETERMINATIONS MADE: | The Commission determines: 1. The applicant sustained disease injuries to his lumbar spine, thoracic spine, cervical spine, left knee and left shoulder for which his employment was the main contributing factor within the meaning of s 4(b) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (1987 Act). 2. The applicant has sustained a consequential right shoulder condition as the result of his left shoulder injury. 3. The deemed date of the applicant’s injury is 21 August 2021. 4. The applicant is entitled to the payment of weekly compensation from 21 August 2021 to 5. The applicant is entitled to the payment of reasonably necessary medical or related expenses as a result of his injuries in accordance with s 60 of the 1987 Act on production of accounts, receipts and/or Medicare notice of charge. 6. The matter is to be remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor for the assessment of whole person impairment of the applicant’s lumbar spine, left lower extremity (knee), left upper extremity (shoulder) and consequential right upper extremity (shoulder) in accordance with s 66 of the 1987 Act. The Commission orders: 7. The respondent to pay the applicant weekly compensation at the pre-injury average weekly earnings rate of $1,001.26 subject to indexation as follows; (a) 21 August 2021 to 30 September 2021 at $1,001.26 x 95% or $951.20, less current weekly earnings of $798.82, being $152.38 pursuant to s 36(2) of the 1987 Act; (b) 1 October 2021 to 30 October 2021 at $1,001.26 x 1.0119 or $1,013.17 rounded to $1,010 x 95%, or $959.50, less current weekly earnings of $798.82, being $160.68 pursuant to s 36(2) of the 1987 Act; (c) 1 November 2021 to 20 November 2021 at $1,010 x 95%, or $959.50, less current weekly earnings of $923.08, being $36.42 pursuant to s 36(2) of the 1987 Act; (d) 21 November 2021 to 30 March 2022 at $1,010 x 95%, or $959.50, less current weekly earnings of $923.08, being $36.42 pursuant to s 37(2) of the 1987 Act; (e) 1 April 2022 to 30 September 2022 at $1,010 x 1.0184 or $1,028.58 rounded to… |
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Do v Lucky Thanh Transport Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NSWPIC 340
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The tribunal considered whether Do had sustained injuries to his spine, left knee, and bilateral shoulders on the deemed date of injury, which was 21 August 2021. The tribunal examined the medical evidence and determined that Do had sustained disease injuries to his spine, left knee, and left shoulder, and a consequential right shoulder condition on the deemed date of injury. The tribunal held that the applicant was entitled to weekly payments and medical expenses, but remitted the matter to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor to assess the degree of permanent impairment.
The tribunal found that the applicant's injuries were related to his employment and awarded weekly payments and medical expenses. The tribunal noted that the degree of permanent impairment had not been assessed, and therefore, remitted the matter to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor to assess the degree of permanent impairment. The tribunal did not make any orders in relation to the lump sum compensation, as the matter had not been fully argued before the tribunal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.