FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Do v Kolsumdet Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1057
File number(s): NSD 1355 of 2021 Judgment of: BROMWICH J Date of judgment: 7 September 2022 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an extension to the limitation period for defamation proceedings to join a prospective respondent to an existing action under s 56A Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) and application for leave to file and serve an amended statement of claim and originating application to join the prospective respondent as the sixth respondent – where despite numerous inquiries made, the applicants failed to identify the prospective respondent – whether it was not reasonable for the applicants to have initially joined the prospective respondent within the limitation period – held: application granted and leave also be granted to file and serve an amended statement of claim and originating application Legislation: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 31
Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) ss 14B; 56A
Cases cited: Barrett v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA; 96 NSWLR 478
Cassar v Network Ten Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 680
Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction Number of paragraphs: 11 Date of hearing: 7 September 2022 Counsel for the First, Second and Third Applicants: R Rasmussen Solicitor for the First, Second and Third Applicants: O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors Counsel for the Second Respondent: J-E McKenzie Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Hammond Nguyen Turnbull Counsel for the First, Third, Fourth and Fifth Respondents: C Parkin Solicitor for the First, Third, Fourth and Fifth Respondents: State Law Group ORDERS
NSD 1355 of 2021 BETWEEN: JENNIFER DO
First Applicant
BELINDA NGUYEN
Second Applicant
JULIE NGUYEN
Third Applicant
AND: KOLSUMDET PTY LTD ACN 150 631 333 TRADING AS SILVER PEARL (DAI LAM SON) SEAFOOD RESTAURANT
First Respondent
BAILEY WANG
Second Respondent
LIAN CHAISUMDET (and others named in the Schedule)
Third Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
BROMWICH J
DATE OF ORDER:
7 SEPTEMBER 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The applicants be granted an extension of the limitation period in which to commence proceedings against Ms Hahn To, pursuant to s 56A of the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), up to and including 4.00 pm on Friday, 9 September 2022.
2.The applicants have leave to file and serve an amended statement of claim and originating application to join Ms Hahn To as a sixth respondent and to make other amendments substantially in the form annexed to the affidavit of Mr Stewart O’Connell affirmed 16 June 2022.
3.The applicants pay the costs of the first to fifth respondents thrown away by reason of the amendments.
4.Ms To as the sixth respondent pay the applicants’ costs of and incidental to the application for an extension of time.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered…
Continue reading Do v Kolsumdet Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Do v Kolsumdet Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1057
- Case
- [2022] FCA 1057
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the applicants' efforts to identify the prospective respondent and the reasonableness of these efforts in light of the limitation period. It was noted that the applicants had made numerous inquiries and had been diligent in their attempts to locate Ms Hahn To. The court found that it was not reasonable for the applicants to have identified Ms Hahn To within the limitation period and granted the application for an extension. The court also granted leave to file and serve an amended statement of claim and originating application to join Ms Hahn To as a sixth respondent.
The court made several orders in relation to the application. The applicants were granted an extension of the limitation period to commence proceedings against Ms Hahn To, up to and including 4.00 pm on Friday, 9 September 2022. The applicants were also granted leave to file and serve an amended statement of claim and originating application to join Ms Hahn To as a sixth respondent and to make other amendments substantially in the form annexed to the affidavit of Mr Stewart O’Connell. The costs of the first to fifth respondents were thrown away by reason of the amendments. Ms To, as the sixth respondent, was ordered to pay the applicants’ costs of and incidental to the application for an extension of time.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The applicants be granted an extension of the limitation period in which to commence proceedings against Ms Hahn To, pursuant to s 56A of the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), up to and including 4.00 pm on Friday, 9 September 2022.
2. The applicants have leave to file and serve an amended statement of claim and originating application to join Ms Hahn To as a sixth respondent and to make other amendments substantially in the form annexed to the affidavit of Mr Stewart O’Connell affirmed 16 June 2022.
3. The applicants pay the costs of the first to fifth respondents thrown away by reason of the amendments.
4. Ms To as the sixth respondent pay the applicants’ costs of and incidental to the application for an extension of time.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.