FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Do v Kolsumdet Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 592
File number: NSD 1355 of 2021 Judgment of: BROMWICH J Date of judgment: 2 June 2023 Date of publication of reasons: 6 June 2023 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for recusal – application made in relation to hearing of defamation proceedings where applicants seeking for proceedings to be reallocated to another judge of the Federal Court of Australia – principles on recusal – held: application dismissed with applicants to pay respondents’ costs Cases cited: Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337
Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction Number of paragraphs: 19 Date of hearing: 2 June 2023 Counsel for the First, Second and Third Applicants: Mr R Rasmussen Solicitor for the First, Second and Third Applicants: O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors Counsel for the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Respondents: Mr C Parkin Solicitor for the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Respondents: State Law Group Counsel for the Second Respondent: Ms J E McKenzie Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Hammond Nguyen Turnbull ORDERS
NSD 1355 of 2021 BETWEEN: JENNIFER DO
First Applicant
BELINDA NGUYEN
Second Applicant
JULIE NGUYEN
Third Applicant
AND: KOLSUMDET PTY LTD ACN 150 631 333 TRADING AS SILVER PEARL (DAI LAM SON) SEAFOOD RESTAURANT
First Respondent
BAILEY WANG
Second Respondent
LIAN CHAISUMDET (and others named in the Schedule)
Third Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
BROMWICH J
DATE OF ORDER:
2 JUNE 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Paragraph 1 of the interlocutory application filed by the applicants and dated 19 May 2023 be dismissed.
2.The applicants pay the respondents’ costs of and incidental to that application.
3.Order 1 of the orders made by Justice Bromwich on 6 April 2023 (Orders) be varied for the applicants to file a reply to the second respondent’s defence to the further amended statement of claim by 4.00 pm on 7 June 2023, limited to answering any defences of honest opinion.
4.Any submission on the stance of a party in relation to transfer of this proceeding to Division 2 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, pursuant to s 32AB of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 27.01(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), limited to 3 pages, be emailed to the associate to Justice Bromwich by 4.00 pm on 13 June 2023, or such further time as may be allowed.
5.Order 3 of the Orders be varied for each party to file and serve the outlines of evidence of witnesses on which they bear the onus by 4.00 pm on 31 July 2023.
6.Order 4 of the Orders be varied for each party to file and serve the outlines of evidence of witnesses in reply by 4.00 pm on 1 September 2023.
7.Any interlocutory application seeking orders for discovery or interrogatories be filed and served by…
Continue reading Do v Kolsumdet Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Do v Kolsumdet Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 592
- Case
- [2023] FCA 592
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants argued that the judge, Justice Bromwich, was biased due to comments he had made in a previous case that was linked to this matter. They sought for the proceedings to be transferred to another judge of the Federal Court of Australia. The respondents countered that the application was an abuse of process and that the judge was not biased. The legal issues before the court were whether the application for recusal was valid and, if so, whether the judge should recuse himself.
The court found that the application for recusal was an abuse of process and that the judge had not acted in a way that demonstrated a real possibility of bias. The court held that the comments made by Justice Bromwich in the previous case were not related to the current proceedings and did not amount to bias. The court further held that the applicants had not established any grounds for the judge to recuse himself. The application for recusal was dismissed, and the applicants were ordered to pay the respondents' costs. The court also varied some of the orders made by Justice Bromwich in relation to the filing and serving of outlines of evidence and interlocutory applications.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Paragraph 1 of the interlocutory application filed by the applicants and dated 19 May 2023 be dismissed.
2. The applicants pay the respondents’ costs of and incidental to that application.
3. Order 1 of the orders made by Justice Bromwich on 6 April 2023 (Orders) be varied for the applicants to file a reply to the second respondent’s defence to the further amended statement of claim by 4.00 pm on 7 June 2023, limited to answering any defences of honest opinion.
4. Any submission on the stance of a party in relation to transfer of this proceeding to Division 2 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, pursuant to s 32AB of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 27.01(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), limited to 3 pages, be emailed to the associate to Justice Bromwich by 4.00 pm on 13 June 2023, or such further time as may be allowed.
5. Order 3 of the Orders be varied for each party to file and serve the outlines of evidence of witnesses on which they bear the onus by 4.00 pm on 31 July 2023.
6. Order 4 of the Orders be varied for each party to file and serve the outlines of evidence of witnesses in reply by 4.00 pm on 1 September 2023.
7. Any interlocutory application seeking orders for discovery or interrogatories be filed and served by no later than 4.00 pm on 15 September 2023.
8. Any application for discovery or interrogatories to be heard between 18 and 28 September 2023, on a date to be fixed in consultation with the parties.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.